Advertisement

Evolution of the Luminosity Function of Extragalactic Objects

  • Vahé Petrosian
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 121)

Abstract

A non-parametric procedure for determination of the evolution of the luminosity function of extragalactic objects and use of this for prediction of expected redshift and luminosity distribution of objects is described. The relation between this statistical evolution of the population and their physical evolution, such as the variation with cosmological epoch of their luminosity and formation rate is presented. This procedure when applied to a sample of optically selected quasars with redshifts less than two shows that the luminosity function evolves more strongly for higher luminosities, indicating a larger quasar activity at earlier epochs and a more rapid evolution of the objects during their higher luminosity phases. It is also shown that absence of many quasars at redshifts greater than three implies slowing down of this evolution in the conventional cosmological models, perhaps indicating that this is near the epoch of the birth of the quasar (and galaxies). However, it has been shown that the same is not true in all cosmological models, in some of which the epoch of birth could be at much higher redshifts.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braccesi, A., Formiggini, L. and Gandolfi, E. 1970, Astron. and Astrophys. 5, 264.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Hoag, A.A. and Smith, M.G. 1971, Ap. J. 217, 362.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kron, R.G. and Chiu, L.-T.G. 1981, Publ. A. S. P. 93, 397.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lewis, D.W., MacAlpine, G.M. and Weedman, D.W. 1971, Ap. J. 233, 787.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lynden-Bell, D. 1971, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 155, 95.ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Lynds, R. and Petrosian, V. 1972, Ap. J. 175, 591.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Marshall, H. L., Tananbaum, H., Zamorini, G., Huchra, J. P., Braccesi, A. and Zitelli, V. 1983, Ap. J. 269, 42.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Osmer, P.S. 1982, Ap. J. 253,28.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Osmer, P.S. and Smith, M.G. 1980, Ap. J. Suppl. 42. 333.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Peebles, P.J.E. 1984, Ap. J. 284, 439.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Petrosian, V. 1973, Ap. J. 183, 359.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Petrosian, V. and Jankevics, A. 1983, Quasars and Gravitational Lenses, Proc. of the 24th Liege Int’l. Astrophys. Colloq., Ed. J. P. Swings, pp. 250–257.Google Scholar
  13. Petrosian, V. and Salpeter, E.E. 1968, Ap. J. 151, 411.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmidt, M. and Green, R.F. 1983, Ap. J. 269, 352.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sramek, R.A. and Weedman, D.W. 1978, Ap. J. 221, 468.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wampler, E.J., Gaskell, C.M., Burke, W.L. and Baldwin, J.A. 1984, Ap. J. 276, 403.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vahé Petrosian
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Space Science and AstrophysicsStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations