Advertisement

The Protogalactic Connection

  • Joseph Silk
  • Rosemary F. G. Wyse
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 121)

Abstract

We argue that the physics underlying active galactic nuclei and the quasar phenomenon will not be understood without first having knowledge of the processes governing the gas to star transformation that occurs during galaxy formation. Galaxies actually in the process of forming are extremely difficult to observe, or perhaps even recognise, and we take a more indirect approach, utilising the observed scaling relations between various parameters of present day galaxies to infer information about the physical conditions at the epoch of galaxy formation. One example of such an approach is given, in which the characteristic parameters of galaxies are utilized as fossil records that help constrain the physical processes, involving both dissipation and dynamical relaxation, by which galaxies formed. Two contrasting models for the early evolution of a galaxy — a single massive burst of star formation, as opposed to many small bursts — may be distinguished by their different predictions for the power spectrum of the extragalactic background light in different bandpasses. A more definitive theory of protogalactic evolution may be attainable as the collection of data, its modelling and its interpretation proceed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bertola, F., Capaccioli, M. and Oke, J. B., 1982, Ap. J., 254, 494.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumenthal, G., Faber, S., Primack, J. and Rees, M. J., 1984, Nature, 311, 517.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruzual, G., 1983, Ap. J., 273, 105.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Couch, W. J., Shanks, T. and Pence, W., 1985, M.N.R.A.S., 213, 215.ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Dekel, A. and Silk, J., 1985, Ap. J., in press.Google Scholar
  6. Faber, S. and Gallagher, J., 1979, Ann. Rev. Astr. Ap., 17, 135.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hauser, M. G. et al., 1984, Ap. J. (Letters), 278, L15.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Koo, D. C., 1984, in proceedings of RGO workshop Astronomy with Automatic Plate Measuring Machines.Google Scholar
  9. Koo, D. C. and Kron, R. G., 1980, P.A.S.P., 92, 537.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koo, D. C. and Szalay, A., 1984, Ap. J., 282, 390.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kristian, J., Sandage, A. and Westphal, J. A., 1978, Ap. J., 221, 383.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mould, J., 1984, P.A.S.P., 96, 773.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neugebauer, G., et al., 1984, Ap. J. (Letters), 278, L83.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmidt, M. and Green, R. F., 1983, Ap. J., 269, 352.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Silk, J., 1985, Ap. J., in press.Google Scholar
  16. Stevenson, P. R. F., Shanks, T., Fong, R. and MacGillivary, H. T., 1985, M.N.R.A.S., 213, 953.ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. van Brengel, W., Filippenko, A. V., Heckman, T. and Miley, G., 1985, Ap. J., 293, 83.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wyse, R. F. G., 1985, Ap. J., in press.Google Scholar
  19. Wyse, R. F. G. and Silk, J., 1985, Ap. J. (Letters), in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Silk
    • 1
  • Rosemary F. G. Wyse
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AstronomyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations