Advertisement

Efficiency of Oil Adjuvanted Infectious Bronchitis Vaccines

  • M. Guittet
  • V. Marius
  • J. P. Picault
  • G. Bennejean
  • H. Lecoq
  • J. Lamande
Chapter
  • 156 Downloads
Part of the Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science book series (CTVM, volume 37)

Abstract

Four inactivated oil emulsion experimental and commercial infectious bronchitis vaccines were evaluated in non-vaccinated layers and in layers previously vaccinated with live vaccines, for their ability to increase the intensity and persistence of the immune response.

Experiments were performed on two specific pathogen free flocks which received only oil adjuvanted vaccines (OAV) and six conventional flocks previously vaccinated with live vaccines.

It is concluded that commercial OAV vaccines administered after live ones give better results in terms of both antibody responses and egg production. Revaccination of birds with H52 strain vaccine after a primary vaccination with Hl20 strain seems worthless if an oil adjuvanted vaccine is used for revaccination before lay.

Keywords

Haemagglutination Inhibition Newcastle Disease Live Vaccine Vaccination Schedule Avian Infectious Bronchitis Virus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, D.J. and Chettle, N.J. 1977. Procedures for the haemagglutina- tion and the haemagglutination inhibition tests for avian infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Pathology, 6, 9–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry, D.M. 1965a. Infectious Bronchitis and an Inactivated Infectious Bronchitis Vaccine. Spring Conference of the U.K. W.P.S.A. Branch, 277–283.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, D.M. 1965b. Inactivated Infectious Bronchitis Vaccine. J. Comp. Path., 75, 409–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, D.M. 1966. Persistance des anticorps apres vaccination avec le vaccin inactive contre la Bronchite Infecteuse. Vet. Ree., 78, No 2, 81–83.Google Scholar
  5. Box, P.G., Keeble, S.A., Berry, D.M. 1966. Expérience sur le terrain de 1′emploi de vaccins inactivés pour la lutte contre la Maladie de Newcastle et la Bronchite Infectieuse. Treizième Congrès International de volailles, Kiev, URSS.Google Scholar
  6. Box, P.G., Beresford, A.V. and Roberts, B. 1980. Protection of laying hens against infectious bronchitis with inactivated emulsion vaccines. Vet. Ree., 106, 264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Box, P.G., Roberts, B. and Beresford, A.V. 1981. Infectious bronchitis - preventing loss of egg production by emulsion vaccine at point of lay. International Symposium on Immunisation of Adult Birds with Inactivated Oil Adjuvant Vaccines, Lyon, France. Development of Biological Standards, 51, 97–103.Google Scholar
  8. Box, P.G. and Ellis, K.P. 1985. Infectious bronchitis in laying hens: interference with response to emulsion vaccine by attenuated live vaccine. Avian Pathology 14, 9–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brion, A., Moraillon, A., Cakala, A. 1969. Valeur de la vaccination contre la Bronchitie Infectieuse aviaire par virus inactivé à la Beta- propiolactone. Recherches Véte′rinaires, 2, 85–91.Google Scholar
  10. Coria, M.F. 1972. Avian infectious bronchitis virus: serologic response of chickens to seven Beta -Propiolactone-inactivated strains. Avian diseases, 16, No 5, 1103–1108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gough, R.E., Allan, W.H. and Nedelciu, D. 1977. Immune response to monovalent and bivalent Newcastle disease and infectious bronchitis inactivated vaccines. Avian Pathology, 6, 131–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gough, R.E., Wyeth, P.J. and Bracewell, C.D. 1981. Immune responses of breeding chickens to trivalent oil emulsion vaccines responses to infectious bronchitis. Vet. Ree., 108, 99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guittet, M., Bennejean, G., Picault, J.P., Marius, V., 1984. Vaccins aviaires contre les affections respiratoires. Ree. de Med. Vet., 160, No 11, 1085–1096.Google Scholar
  14. McDougall, J.S. 1969. Avian infectious bronchitis: the protection afîcrded by an inactivated virus vaccine. Vet. Ree., 85, 378–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marius, V., Guittet, M., Bennejean, G., 1982. Evaluation de l′immunité postvaccinale bronchite infectieuse chez des volailles élevées con- ventionnellement. Etude comparée de quatre techniques serologiques. Av. Path., 11, 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Picault, J.P., Marius, V. 1984. La bronchite infectieuse aviaire. Ree. Med. Vet., 160, No 11, 939–950.Google Scholar
  17. Protais, J., Marius, V., Guittet, M., Bougon, M. et Bennejean, G. 1982. Influence de la bronchite infectieuse sur la production éfe la qualité des oeufs. Bull. Inf. Stat. Exp. Avic., Ploufragan, 22, 71–86.Google Scholar
  18. Swarbrick, O., Wyatt, A.R. and Leal, A.E. 1967. The use of inactivated infectious bronchitis vaccine in a large egg-production unit. Vet. Ree. 80, 273–277.Google Scholar
  19. Renault, L., Deshayes, A., Alamagny, A., Marius, V., Guittet, M., Bennejean, G. 1981. Diagnostic et contrôle de la vaccination de la bronchite infectieuse aviaire. Bull. Soc. Vet. Prat., France, 65, 1–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels-Luxembourg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Guittet
    • 1
  • V. Marius
    • 1
  • J. P. Picault
    • 1
  • G. Bennejean
    • 1
  • H. Lecoq
    • 1
  • J. Lamande
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire National de Pathologie AviaireMinistere de l’Agriculture, Direction de la Qualité Services VétérinairesPloufraganFrance

Personalised recommendations