Skip to main content

Building a Global Plant Genetic Resources System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Genomics of Plant Genetic Resources

Abstract

The greatest challenge facing humanity today is to feed tomorrow’s population of more than 9 billion people. Production has to increase by about 70 % with the additional uncertainties associated with climate change, against a background of less land and less water being available for agriculture. More than ever before, this will require the wise use of plant genetic resources. Scientific advances such as high-throughput sequencing, marker assisted selection and direct manipulation of the genome have allowed breeders to identify traits and incorporate them into improved varieties more efficiently and more rapidly. The problem is that the genetic resources that are the foundation of these efforts are not being managed effectively. Ex-situ collections are currently scattered across roughly 1750 genebanks, many of which are in poor physical condition and which continue to be degraded as a result of insufficient and insecure funding. Many of the accessions are duplicates, which is a waste of precious resources. There is little publicly available information about the accessions. Crop wild relatives, which are so important for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, are poorly represented in genebanks and in any case need also to be conserved in the wild so that they can continue to evolve in response to those stresses. There is an urgent need to address all these issues by building an effective global system for the conservation and use of plant genetic resources. It will require close collaboration and partnership to ensure efficiency, which in turn will require a commitment to a global system of access and benefit sharing as foreseen by the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. It will require secure and sustainable funding so that we do not have to go through this process again every few decades. And it will require a global information system that guarantees access to much more useful information as well as to the accessions themselves. The challenges are many and complex. As the paper will show, we have the means to meet them, if we engage strongly now, and if we do not, we have little hope of feeding the future population adequately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “SRES scenarios refer to the scenarios described in the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES 2000). The SRES scenarios are grouped into four scenario families (A1, A2, B1 and B2) that explore alternative development pathways, covering a wide range of demographic, economic and technological driving forces and resulting GHG emissions. The SRES scenarios do not include additional climate policies above current ones. The emissions projections are widely used in the assessments of future climate change, and their underlying assumptions with respect to socio-economic, demographic and technological change serve as inputs to many recent climate change vulnerability and impact assessments. The A1 storyline assumes a world of very rapid economic growth, a global population that peaks in mid-century and rapid introduction of new and more efficient technologies. A1 is divided into three groups that describe alternative directions of technological change: fossil intensive (A1FI), non-fossil energy resources (A1T) and a balance across all sources (A1B). B1 describes a convergent world, with the same global population as A1, but with more rapid changes in economic structures toward a service and information economy. B2 describes a world with intermediate population and economic growth, emphasising local solutions to economic, social, and environmental sustainability. A2 describes a very heterogeneous world with high population growth, slow economic development and slow technological change. No likelihood has been attached to any of the SRES scenarios” (IPCC, 2007).

  2. 2.

    SINGER. http://singer.cgiar.org/index.jsp (last accessed: 22 November 2011).

  3. 3.

    http://www.cropwildrelatives.org/.

  4. 4.

    Hunter D. and Heywood V. (Eds). 2010. Crop Wild Relatives: A Manual of in situ Conservation. Issues in Agricultural Biodiversity. Earthscan. 440 p.

  5. 5.

    http://www.genesys-pgr.org.

  6. 6.

    http://www.ars-grin.gov/.

  7. 7.

    http://eurisco.ecpgr.org/static/index.html.

  8. 8.

    http://singer.cgiar.org/.

  9. 9.

    http://www.genesys-pgr.org.

  10. 10.

    http://aegis.cgiar.org/.

  11. 11.

    http://www.avrdc.org/.

  12. 12.

    http://www.catie.ac.cr/magazin_ENG.asp?CodIdioma=ENG.

  13. 13.

    http://www.nordgen.org/sgsv/.

  14. 14.

    http://www.generationcp.org/.

  15. 15.

    In 2012, it was decided to implement these activities through different CRPs, rather than including them all in CRP 1.1.

  16. 16.

    http://wheatrust.cornell.edu/.

  17. 17.

    http://globalrust.org/traction/project/about.

  18. 18.

    https://research.cip.cgiar.org/confluence/display/GILBWEB/Home.

  19. 19.

    CIP. 2010. Late Blight: Action plan for an effective response to a global threat. White paper prepared by the participants to the Bellagio Late Blight Conference, Bellagio, Italy, 16 −20 Nov, 2009. International Potato Centre (CIP). Available at: http://cipotato.org/publications/pdf/222222.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2011).

  20. 20.

    http://www.planttreaty.org/content/overview-fs.

  21. 21.

    CGIAR report to the 2nd Session of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: ftp://ftp.fao.org/ag/agp/planttreaty/gb2/gb2i12e.pdf; CGIAR report to the 3rd Session of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: ftp://ftp.fao.org/ag/agp/planttreaty/gb3/gb3i15e.pdf; and CGIAR report to the 4th Session of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: http://www.itpgrfa.net/International/sites/default/files/gb4i05e.pdf.

Abbreviations

AEGIS:

A European Genebank Integrated System

AVRDC:

World Vegetable Centre

BGRI:

Borlaug Global Rust Initiative

CAAS:

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

CATIE:

Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center

CBD:

Convention on Biological Diversity

CGIAR:

Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research

CGRFA:

Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

CIMMYT:

International Center for Maize and Wheat Improvement

CIP:

International Potato Center

CO2 :

Carbon Dioxide

COP-10:

Tenth Conference of the Parties of the CBD

CRP:

CGIAR Research Programme

CWR:

Crop Wild Relatives

EAPGRIN:

East African Plant Genetic Resources Network

ECPGR:

European Cooperative Programme for Genetic Resources

EMBRAPA:

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária

EURISCO:

European Internet Search Catalogue

FAO:

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

GCDT:

Global Crop Diversity Trust

GCP:

CGIAR Generation Challenge Programme

GEF:

Global Environmental Facility

GHG:

Greenhouse Gas

GILB:

Global Initiative on Late Blight

GIS:

Geographical Information System

GPA:

Global Plan of Action on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

GRI:

Global Rust Initiative

GRIN:

Germplasm Resources Information Network

IBPGR:

International Board for Plant Genetic Resources

ICARDA:

International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas

ICWG-GR:

CGIAR Inter-Centre Working Group on Genetic Resources

ILRI:

International Livestock Research Institute

IPCC:

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

ITPGRFA:

International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

IUCN:

International Union for Conservation of Nature

LB:

Late Blight

NARS:

National Agricultural Research System

NBPGR-India:

Indian National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources

NGRP:

National Genetic Resources Program

NordGen:

Nordic Genetic Resources Centre

NUS:

Neglected and Underutilized Species

PGRFA:

Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

SANPGR:

South Asia Network on Plant Genetic Resources

SGRP:

CGIAR System-wide Genetic Resources Programme

SGSV:

Svalbard Global Seed Vault

SINGER:

CGIAR System-wide Information Network for Genetic Resources

SPGRC:

Southern African Development Community Plant Genetic Resources Centre

SRES:

Special Report on Emissions Secnarios

SMTA:

Standard Material Transfer Agreement

UNEP:

United Nations Environmental Programme

USA:

United States of America

USDA:

United States Department of Agriculture

USDA-ARS:

Agricultural Research Service of the USDA

References

  • Bioversity International and UNEP-GEF (2011) Crop wild relatives global portal. Climate change. http://www.cropwildrelatives.org/cwr/threats.html. Accessed 24 Nov 2011.

  • Bruinsma J (2009) The resource outlook to 2050: by how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050? Paper presented at the FAO Expert Meeting, 24–26 June 2009, Rome, on How to feed the world in 2050. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/ak971e/ak971e00.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • CGRFA (2011) History. Commission on genetic resources for food and agriculture. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO). http://www.fao.org/nr/cgrfa/cgrfa-about/cgrfa-history/en/. Accessed 25 Nov 2011

  • CIMMYT (2005) An assessment of race Ug99 in Kenya and Ethiopia and the potential for impact in neighboring regions and beyond. Report submitted by the expert panel on the stem rust outbreak in Eastern Africa. http://globalrust.org/db/attachments/about/2/1/Sounding%20the%20Alarm%20on%20Global%20Stem%20Rust.pdf . Accessed 16 Dec 2011

  • CIP (2010) Late Blight: action plan for an effective response to a global threat. White paper prepared by the participants to the Bellagio Late Blight Conference, Bellagio, Italy, 16–20 November 2009. International Potato Centre (CIP). http://cipotato.org/publications/pdf/222222.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2011

  • Coakley SM, Scherm H, Chakraborty S (1999) Climate change and plant disease management. Annu Rev Phytopathol 37:399–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EURISCO (2011) About EURISCO. http://eurisco.ecpgr.org/about/about_eurisco.html . Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  • FAO (1996) The FAO global system for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO focus. FAO. Available at: http://www.fao.org/FOCUS/E/96/06/06-e.htm. Accessed 28 Nov 2011

  • FAO (1998) State of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Report no. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2008) Number of hungry people rises to 963 million: high food prices to blame—economic crisis could compound woes. FAO Media Centre. Rome. http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/8836/. Accessed 9 Nov 2011

  • FAO (2009) The state of food insecurity in the world 2009. FAO. Rome. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/i0876e/i0876e.pdf. Accessed 9 Nov 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010a) The state of food insecurity in the world 2010. FAO. Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1683e/i1683e.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2011

  • FAO (2010b) Second report on the state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Commission on genetic resources for food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2011a) The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture (SOLAW)—managing systems at risk. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Rome and Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2011b) Report of the commission on genetic resources for food and agriculture. thirteenth regular session. Rome, 18–22 July 2011. http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/023/mc192e.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  • FAO (2011c) Fourth session of the governing body of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, Bali, Indonesia, 14–18 March 2011. IT/GB-4/11/Report. http://www.planttreaty.org/sites/default/files/gb4re.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2011

  • GCDT (2011) Annual report 2010. Global Crop Diversity Trust. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajjar R, Hodgkin T (2007) The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 156:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halewood M, Nnadozie K (2008) Giving priority to the commons: the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. In: Tansey G, Rajotte T (eds) The future control of food: a guide to international negotiations and rules on intellectual property, Biodiversity and Food Security. Quaker international affairs programme, international development research centre. Earthscan, London, pp 115–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin T, Demers N, Frison E (2012) The evolving global system of conservation and use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture: what is it, and where does the Treaty fit in? In: Halewood M, López Noriega I, Louafi S (eds) Crop genetic resources as a global commons: challenges in international law and governance. Issues in agricultural biodiversity. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Gimenez E (2002) Measuring farmers’ agroecological resistance after Hurricane Mitch in Nicaragua: a case study in participatory, sustainable land management impact monitoring. Agr Ecosyst Environ 93:87–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter D, Heywood V (2010) Crop wild relatives: A manual of in situ conservation. Issues in agricultural biodiversity. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • IAASTD (2009) Agriculture at a cross-roads. Global report. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007, Synthesis Report. An assessment of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ITPGRFA (2011a) Treaty’s Benefit-sharing fund: list of projects approved. International treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO. ftp://ftp.fao.org/ag/agp/planttreaty/funding/call2010/BSF2010_Projects_approved_web.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • ITPGRFA (2011b) Experience of the international agricultural research centres of the consultative group on international agricultural research with the implementation of the agreements with the governing body, with particular reference to the use of the standard material transfer agreement for Annex 1 and Non Annex 1 crops. IT/GB-4/11/Inf. 5. Fourth session of the governing body, Bali, Indonesia, 14–18 March 2011. International treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO. Rome. http://www.planttreaty.org/sites/default/files/gb4i05e.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2011

  • Jarvis A, Touval JL, Castro Schmitz M et al (2010) Assessment of threats to ecosystems in South America. J Nat Conserv 18:180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane A, Jarvis A (2007) Changes in climate will modify the geography of crop suitability: agricultural biodiversity can help with adaptation. J SAT Agric Res 4:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C et al (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319:607–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Bänziger M, Magorokosho C, Vivek B (2011) Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials. Nat Clim Change 1:42–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jury SL et al (2006) Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. Biodivers Conserv 15:2673–2685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micronutrient Initiative (2009) Investing in the Future: a united call to action on vitamin and mineral deficiencies. http://www.unitedcalltoaction.org

  • Molina AB, Molina IR (2009) The use of genetic diversity in managing diseases of crops: experiences in rice and bananas. Paper presented at the FFTC-PCARRD international seminar on development and adoption of green technology for sustainable agriculture and enhancement of rural entrepreneurship, IIRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, 28 September-2 October 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualset C, Hijmans RJ, McGuire PE et al (2011) CGIAR consortium board-commissioned genetic resources scoping study. Submitted to the CGIAR Consortium Board in February 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawadogo M, Ouedraogo J, Belem M et al (2005) Components of the ecosystem as instruments of cultural practices in the in situ conservation of agricultural biodiversity. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 141:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawadogo M, Balma D, Some L et al (2006) Management of the agrobiodiversity under the clinal variation of rainfall pattern in Burkina Faso: the example of okra drought resistance. In: Jarvis D, Mar I, Sears L (eds) Enhancing crop genetic diversity to manage abiotic stress, 23–27 May 2005. Budapest, Hungary, pp 18–24

    Google Scholar 

  • SGRP (2009) Standard material transfer agreement. CGIAR system-wide genetic resources programme. http://www.sgrp.cgiar.org/?q=node/171. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  • Shanthakumar G, Bhag Mal, Padulosi S, Bala Ravi S (2010) Participatory varietal selection: a case study on small millets in Karnataka. Indian J Plant Genet Res 23:117–121

    Google Scholar 

  • SINGER (2011) SINGER Website. http://singer.cgiar.org/. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  • Sthapit B, Padulosi S, Mal B (2010a) Role of on-farm/in situ conservation and underutilized crops in the wake of climate change. Indian J Plant Genet Resour 23:145–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Sthapit BR, Silwal S, Gyawali S et al (2010b) Participatory plant breeding as a strategy for supporting the assessment, access, use and benefit of traditional crop genetic diversity in the farmer’s production system: overview and the case of the Mansara rice (Oryza sativa L.) landrace in Nepal. EUCARPIA 2nd Conference of the “Organic and Low-Input Agriculture” section: breeding for resilience: a strategy for organic and low-input farming systems? Paris, pp 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DSG, Twyman C, Osbahr H, Hewitson B (2007) Adaptation to climate change and variability: farmer responses to intra-seasonal precipitation trends in South Africa. Climatic Change 83:301–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuberosa R, Graner A, Varshney RK (2011) Genomics of plant genetic resources: an introduction. Plant Genet Resour 9:151–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/GEF (2011) In−situ conservation of crop wild relatives through enhanced information management and field application. 20 projects to showcase 20 historic years of environmental finance. UNEP/GEF celebrating twenty years. http://www.unep.org/dgef/Portals/43/news/facts/CropsWildFinal.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2011

  • Varshney RK, Tuberosa R (2007) Genomics-assisted crop improvement: an overview. In: Varshney RK, Tuberosa R, (Eds) “Genomics-Assisted Crop Improvement (Vol. 1): genomics approaches and platforms”. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JW, Jackson ST, Kutzbach JE (2007) Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:5738–5742

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu YY, Wang YY, Zhou JH (2007) Crop variety diversification for disease control. In: Jarvis DI, Padoch C, Cooper HD (eds) Managing biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems. Bioversity International. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 320–337

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emile Frison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frison, E., Demers, N. (2014). Building a Global Plant Genetic Resources System. In: Tuberosa, R., Graner, A., Frison, E. (eds) Genomics of Plant Genetic Resources. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7572-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics