Advertisement

Technology Integration in Secondary School Mathematics: The Development of Teachers’ Professional Identities

  • Merrilyn GoosEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Education in the Digital Era book series (MEDE, volume 2)

Abstract

This chapter reports on research into the impact of digital technologies on Australian mathematics teachers’ classroom practice. The aim of the study was to identify and analyse individual and contextual factors influencing secondary mathematics teachers’ use of technology, and compare ways in which these factors come together to shape teachers’ pedagogical identities. The first section of the chapter examines the teacher’s role in terms of their pedagogical identities as users of technology, and introduces two theoretical frameworks for investigating trajectories of identity development. One framework classifies ways in which technology can change teaching and learning roles and mathematical practices. The other is concerned with teacher learning and development, and explains why teachers might embrace or resist technology-related change. The sections that follow provide case studies of two beginning teachers of secondary school mathematics who were integrating digital technologies into their classroom practice. Analysis of these case studies highlights issues related to identity development and demonstrates that identity trajectories are neither random nor fully determined, but instead are constrained by person-environment relationships.

Keywords

Identity Sociocultural perspectives Technology metaphors Valsiner Zone theory Zone of proximal development Zone of free movement Zone of promoted action 

Supplementary material

References

  1. Artigue, M. (2010). The future of teaching and learning mathematics with digital technologies. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain: The 17th ICMI study (pp. 463–475). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Burrill, G., Allison, J., Breaux, G., Kastberg, S., Leatham, K., & Sanchez, W. (2003). Handheld graphing technology in secondary mathematics: Research findings and implications for classroom practice. Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  3. Cobb, P., McClain, K., Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Confrey, J., Hoyles, C., Jones, D., Kahn, K., Maloney, A., Nguyen, K., Noss, R., & Pratt, D. (2010). Designing software for mathematical engagement through modeling. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain: The 17th ICMI study (pp. 19–45). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 813–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellington, A. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students’ achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 433–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forgasz, H. (2006). Factors that encourage and inhibit computer use for secondary mathematics teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(1), 77–93.Google Scholar
  8. Gadanidis, G., & Borba, M. (2008). Our lives as performance mathematicians. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 44–51.Google Scholar
  9. Goos, M. (2005). A sociocultural analysis of the development of pre-service and beginning teachers’ pedagogical identities as users of technology. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goos, M. (2009a). A sociocultural framework for understanding technology integration in secondary school mathematics. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 113–120). Thessaloniki: PME.Google Scholar
  11. Goos, M. (2009b). Reforming mathematics teacher education: Theorising teachers’ and students’ use of technology. In C. Ng & P. Renshaw (Eds.), Reforming learning: Concepts, issues and practice in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 43–65). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goos, M. (2011). Technology integration in secondary mathematics: Enhancing the professionalisation of prospective teachers. In O. Zaslavsky & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Constructing knowledge for teaching secondary mathematics: Tasks to enhance prospective and practicing teacher learning (pp. 209–225). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2002). Building learning communities to support beginning teachers’ use of technology. Proceedings of the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane. Retrieved 21 June 2012 from http://www.aare.edu.au/02pap/goo02058.htm
  14. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2000). Reshaping teacher and student roles in technology-enriched classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12, 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J.-B. (2010). Introduction. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain: The 17th ICMI study (pp. 1–11). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jorgensen, R., & Lowrie, T. (2011). Digital games: Creating new opportunities for mathematics learning. In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Mathematics: New traditions and [new] practices. Proceedings of the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers and the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 406–413). Adelaide: AAMT & MERGA.Google Scholar
  17. Lerman, S. (2001). A review of research perspectives on mathematics teacher education. In F. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 33–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lowrie, T. (2005). Problem solving in technology rich contexts: Mathematics sense making in out-of-school environments. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3–4), 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Olive, J., Makar, K., Hoyos, V., Kor, L. K., Kosheleva, O., & Straesser, R. (2010). Mathematical knowledge and practices resulting from access to digital technologies. In C. Hoyles & J. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain: The 17th ICMI study (pp. 133–177). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Penglase, M., & Arnold, S. (1996). The graphics calculator in mathematics education: A critical review of recent research. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 8, 58–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Queensland Board of Senior Secondary School Studies. (2000). Mathematics C senior syllabus. Brisbane: Author.Google Scholar
  22. Simonsen, L. M., & Dick, T. P. (1997). Teachers’ perceptions of the impact of graphing calculators in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16, 239–268.Google Scholar
  23. Tharp, M. L., Fitzsimons, J. A., & Ayers, R. L. B. (1997). Negotiating a technological shift: Teacher perception of the implementation of graphing calculators. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16, 551–575.Google Scholar
  24. Thomas, M. O. J. (2006). Teachers using computers in the mathematics classroom: A longitudinal study. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehliková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 265–272). Prague: PME.Google Scholar
  25. Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s action: A theory of human development (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Wallace, R. (2004). A framework for understanding teaching with the Internet. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 447–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 165–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations