Advertisement

Geomorphologic Risk Modelling of the Sibiu Depression Using Geospatial Surface Analyses

  • Marioara Costea
  • Roxana Giusca
  • Rodica Ciobanu

Abstract

Extreme events in general, and the geomorphologic ones in particular, are highly topical problems. There were addresses by many researchers in the field of geology and physical geography (more specific by the climatologists and geomorphologists), but also by biologists, chemists, ecologists, etc. These are studied through the analysis of some types of processes and production mechanisms, and secondly by the effects they create on other environmental subsystems.

Keywords

Geographical Information System Stream Order Analytic Network Process Rill Erosion Geomorphologic Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alcantara-Ayala, I. (2002). Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries. Geomorphology, 47, 107— 124, Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Alkema, D. and Cavallin, A. (2001). Geomorphologic Risk Assessment for EIA, Studi Trontini, di Scienze Natureli. Acta Geologica, 78, 139-145.Google Scholar
  3. Cannon, T. (1993). A hazard need not a disaster make: vulnerability and the causes of natural disasters. In: Merriman, P.A., Browitt, C.W.A. (Eds.), Natural Disasters: Protecting Vulnerable Communities (pp. 92- 105). Thomas Telford, London.Google Scholar
  4. Ciobanu, R. (2007). The implications of the geological support in the geographical risk phenomena: the Sibiu County case. Brukenthal. Acta Musei, Sibiu, II(3), 19-29.Google Scholar
  5. Ciupangea, D., Pauca, M. and Ichim, Tr. (1970). Geologia Depresiunii Transilvaniei. Bucuresti, Editura Academiei.Google Scholar
  6. Costea, M. (2006). Riscul la inundatii. Impactul in peisaj. In: Stef, V. and Costea, M. (Eds.), Hidrologie aplicata (pp. 205-240). Sibiu, Editura Universitatii "Lucian Blaga".Google Scholar
  7. Giusca, R. (2006). Modele ale degradarilor de teren din Muntii Sureanu, Muntii Cindrel si Depresiunea Sibiului. Sibiu, Editura Universitatii "Lucian Blaga".Google Scholar
  8. Ielenicz, M. (2004). Geomorfologie, Editura Universitatii, Bucuresti.Google Scholar
  9. Matthes-Sears, U., Matthes-Sears, W.C., Hastings, J.C. and Oechel, W.C. (1988). The effects of topography and nutrient status on the biomass, vegetative characteristics, and gas exchange of two deciduous shrubs on an arctic tundra slope. Arctic and Alpine Research, 20, 342-351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Murray, C. and Miller, P.C. (1982). Phenological observations of major plant growth forms and species in montane and Eriophorum vaginatum tussock tundra in central Alaska. Holarctic Ecology, 5, 109-116.Google Scholar
  11. Neaupane, K.M. and Piantanakulchai, M. (2006). Analytic network process model for landslide hazard zonation. Engeneering Geology, 85, 281-294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nellemand, C. and Fry, G. (1995). Quantitative Analysis of Terrain Ruggedness in Reindeer Winter Grounds. Arctic, 48(2), 172-176.Google Scholar
  13. Panizza, M. (1986). The geomorphological hazard assessment and the analysis of geomorphological risk. In: V. Gardiner (ed.). InternationalGeomorphology. Wiley, Chichester, 225-229.Google Scholar
  14. Panizza, M. (1996). Environmental Geomorphology in Developments. Earth Surface Processes 4, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  15. Posea, Gr. (2002). Geomorfologia Romaniei. Bucuresti, Editura Fundatiei "Romania de Maine".Google Scholar
  16. Sandu, M. (1998). Culoarul depresionar Sibiu - Apold. Studiu geomorfologic. Bucuresti, Editura Academiei.Google Scholar
  17. Soeters, R. and van Westen, C.J. (1996). Slope instability recognition, analysis and zonation. In: Turner, A.K. and Schuster, R.L. (Eds.), Landslides. Investigation, Mitigation, Transportation Research Board (pp. 129-177). Special Report 247, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  18. Thakur, J.K., Srivastava, P.K., Singh, S.K. and Vekerdy, Z. (2011). Ecological monitoring of wetlands in semi-arid region of Konya closed basin, Turkey. Regional Environmental Change (DOI: 10.1007/s10113-011-0241-x).Google Scholar
  19. Toderas, T. and Giusca, R. (2004). Aplicarea noilor tehnici GIS in evaluarea reliefului din Depresiunea Sibiului. Revista Geografica, Bucuresti, 68-72.Google Scholar
  20. Tufescu, V. (1966). Subcarpatii si Depresiunile marginale ale Transilvaniei, Bucuresti, Editura Stiintifica.Google Scholar
  21. Varnes, D.J. (1984). Landslide hazard zonation: A review of principles and practice. United Nations International, Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Wilson, M.F.J. et al. (2007). Multiscale terrain analysis of multibeam bathymetry data for habitat mapping on the continental slope. Marine Geodesy, 30, 3-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zezere, J.L. (2002). Landslide susceptibility assessment considering landslide typology. A case study in the north Lisbon (Portugal). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, EGU. 2, 73-82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Capital Publishing Company 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marioara Costea
    • 1
  • Roxana Giusca
    • 2
  • Rodica Ciobanu
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Sciences, Department of Ecology and Environment Protection“Lucian Blaga” University of SibiuSibiuRomania
  2. 2.American Sentinel University, AuroraColoradoUSA
  3. 3.National Brukenthal MuseumSibiuRomania

Personalised recommendations