Integration of Geographic Information Systems for Monitoring and Dissemination of Marine Environment Data

  • Marcin Kulawiak
  • Marek Moszynski


The issue of monitoring, analysis and visualization of marine activity, either for the purpose of environment protection or threat sensing, has been the subject of intensive research for many years. In the last decades, presented solutions have shown the advantages of dedicated software for storing and management of acoustic and spatial data (Stepnowski et al., 1996; Trygonis et al., 2009; Thakur et al., 2011) as well as the potential of web mapping in application to environmental modelling (Maceachren and Kraak, 1997; Doyle et al., 1998; Goodall et al., 2011). In more recent years, many commercial and scientific institutions have been continuously contributing to the process of development and application of various tools for aquatic sensing. Because of this, the variety of marine sensors is very wide, ranging from simple techniques such as direct sampling or hydrological measurements using CTD probes, through hydroacoustic surveys, air-borne photographs and satellite imaging to numerical modelling and simulation.


Advance Very High Resolution Radiometer Advance Very High Resolution Radiometer Geographic Information System Automatic Identification System Open Geospatial Consortium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bakare AM, Morley JG, Simons RR (2008) Developing a seabed resurvey strategy: A GIS approach to modelling seabed changes and resurvey risk. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32(4), 293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chybicki, A., Kulawiak, M., Lubniewski, Z., Luba, M., Moszynski, M. and Dabrowski, J. (2008). GIS for Remote Sensing, Analysis and Visualization of Marine Pollution and Other Marine Ecosystem Components. Proceedings of 2008 1st International Conference on Information Technology, 223-226.Google Scholar
  3. Doyle S, Dodge M, Smith A (1998) The potential of Web-based mapping and virtual reality technologies for modelling urban environments. Computer, Environment and Urban Systems 22(2), 137–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goodall JL, Robinson BF, Castronova AM (2011) Modeling water resource systems using a service-oriented computing paradigm. Environmental Modelling & Software 26(5), 573–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamre T, Krasemann H, Groom S, Dunne D, Breitbach G, Hackett B, S0rensen, K. and Sandven, S. (2009) Interoperable web GIS services for marine pollution monitoring and forecasting. Journal of Coastal Conservation 13(1), 1–13 Google Scholar
  6. Kraak M-J (2004) The role of the map in a Web-GIS environment. Journal of Geographical Systems 6, 83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kruger A, Khandelwal SG, Bradley A (2007) AHPSVER: A web-based system for hydrologic forecast verification. Computers & Geosciences 33, 739–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kulawiak M, Luba M, Stepnowski A, Prospathopoulos A, Kioroglou S, Perivoliotis L, Grammatikaki M (2008) Integrating a Web-based GIS to a marine pollution monitoring and forecasting system. Proceedings of the International Conference on Marine Data and Information Systems, Athens (Greece)Google Scholar
  9. Kulawiak, M., Chybicki, A. and Moszynski, M. (2010a). Web-based GIS as a tool for supporting marine research. Marine Geodesy, 33(2 and 3),135-153.Google Scholar
  10. Kulawiak M, Prospathopoulos A, Perivoliotis L, Luba M, Kioroglou S, Stepnowski A (2010b) Interactive visualization of marine pollution monitoring and forecasting data via a Web-based GIS. Computers & Geosciences 36(8), 1069–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maceachren AM, Kraak M-J (1997) Exploratory cartographic visualization: Advancing the agenda. Computers & Geosciences 23(4), 335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Papadopoulos A, Kallos G, Katsafados P, Nickovic S (2002) The Poseidon weather forecasting system: An overview. The Global Atmosphere and Ocean Systems 8(2–3), 219–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pollani A, Triantafyllou G, Petihakis G, Nittis K, Dounas K, Koutitas C (2001) The POSEIDON Operational Tool for the Prediction of Floating Pollutant Transport. Marine Pollution Bulletin 43(7–12), 270–278Google Scholar
  14. Rao M, Fan G, Thomas J, Cherian G, Chudiwale V, Awawdeh M (2007) A web-based GIS Decision Support System for managing and planning USDA’s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). Environmental Modelling & Software 22, 1270–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmidt, C. (2008). OpenLayers: Free Maps for the Web. Retrieved October 22, 2009, from
  16. Stepnowski A, Burczynski J, Ostrowski M, Moszynski M, Lenkiewicz J, Partyka A (1996) ECHOBASE - A Portable Geographic Fishery Research Database System. Marine Geodesy 19, 269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thakur JK, Srivastava PK, Singh SK, Vekerdy Z (2011) Ecological monitoring of wetlands in semi-arid region of Konya closed basin. Turkey Regional Environmental Change. doi:10.1007/s10113-011-0241-xGoogle Scholar
  18. Trygonis V, Georgakarakos S, Simmonds EJ (2009) An operational system for automatic school identification on multibeam sonar echoes. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66(5), 935–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tsou M-H (2004) Integrating Web-based GIS and image processing tools for environmental monitoring and natural resource management. Journal of Geographical Systems 6, 155–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tuama ÉÓ, Hamre T (2007) Design and Implementation of a Distributed GIS Portal for Oil Spill and Harmful Algal Bloom Monitoring in the Marine Environment. Marine Geodesy 30, 145–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Capital Publishing Company 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcin Kulawiak
    • 1
  • Marek Moszynski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeoinformaticsGdansk University of Technology NarutowiczaGdanskPoland

Personalised recommendations