Advertisement

Uncertainty on a Bertrand Duopoly with Product Differentiation

  • Fernanda A. FerreiraEmail author
  • Alberto A. Pinto
Chapter

Abstract

The conclusions of the Bertrand model of competition are substantially altered by the presence of either differentiated goods or asymmetric information about rival’s production costs. In this paper, we consider a Bertrand competition, with differentiated goods. Furthermore, we suppose that each firm has two different technologies, and uses one of them according to a certain probability distribution. The use of either one or the other technology affects the unitary production cost. We show that this game has exactly one Bayesian Nash equilibrium. We do ex-ante and ex-post analyses of firms’ profits and market prices. We prove that the expected profit of each firm increases with the variance of its production costs. We also show that the expected price of each good increases with both expected production costs, being the effect of the expected production costs of the rival dominated by the effect of the own expected production costs.

Keywords

Game theory Industrial organization Optimization Bertrand model Uncertainty 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the Programs POCTI and POCI by FCT and Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e do Ensino Superior. F.A. Ferreira also thanks financial support from ESEIG/IPP and from Centro de Matemática da Universidade do Porto. A.A. Pinto acknowledges financial support from Centro de Matemática da Universidade do Minho.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Allen, J.-F. Thisse, Price equilibria in pure strategies for homogeneous oligopoly. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 1, 63–82 (1992) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Bertrand, Théorie mathématiques de la richesse sociale. J. Savants 68, 303–317 (1883) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F.A. Ferreira, F. Ferreira, A.A. Pinto, Bayesian price leadership, in Mathematical Methods in Engineering, ed. by Kenan Tas et al. (Springer, Dordrecht, 2007), pp. 371–379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F.A. Ferreira, F. Ferreira, A.A. Pinto, Unknown costs in a duopoly with differentiated products, in Mathematical Methods in Engineering, ed. by Kenan Tas et al. (Springer, Dordrecht, 2007), pp. 359–369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F.A. Ferreira, A.A. Pinto, Bertrand model under incomplete information, in Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, ed. by T.E. Simos et al. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1048 (AIP, New York, 2008), pp. 209–212 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.W. Friedman, A non-cooperative equilibrium for supergames. Rev. Econ. Stud. 38, 1–12 (1971) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.W. Friedman, Oligopoly and the Theory of Games (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Gal-Or, Information sharing in oligopoly. Econometrica 53, 329–343 (1985) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Gal-Or, Information transmission: Cournot and Bertrand equilibria. Rev. Econ. Stud. 53, 85–92 (1986) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Hotelling, Stability in competition. Econ. J. 39, 41–57 (1929) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Klemperer, Markets with consumer switching costs. Q. J. Econ. 102, 375–394 (1987) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Kreps, J. Scheinkman, Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes. Bell J. Econ. 14, 326–337 (1983) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Novshek, H. Sonnenschein, Fulfilled expectations and Cournot duopoly with information acquisition and release. Bell J. Econ. 13, 214–218 (1982) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Shapiro, Exchange of cost information in oligopoly. Rev. Econ. Stud. 52, 433–446 (1986) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Spulber, Bertrand competition when rivals’ costs are unknown. J. Ind. Econ. 43, 1–11 (1995) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Tirole, The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1994) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    X. Vives, Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand. J. Econ. Theory 34, 71–94 (1984) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESEIGInstituto Politécnico do PortoVila do CondePortugal
  2. 2.Departamento de MatemáticaUniversidade do MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations