Experimental and Analytical Analysis of Mechanical Response and Deformation Mode Selection in Balsa Wood
This study investigates the influence of relative density and strain rate on the compressive response of balsa wood as a sandwich core material commonly used in naval structures. Compressive strength, plateau stress and densification strain of balsa wood along the grain direction is investigated over its entire density spectrum ranging from 55 to 380kg/m3 at both quasi-static (10−3 s−3) and dynamic (103 s−3) strain rates using a modified Kolsky (split Hopkinson) bar. Scanning electron microscopy is used on recovered specimens subjected to controlled loading histories to identify the failure mode selection as a function of density and strain rate. The results indicate that compressive strength of balsa wood increases with relative density though the rate of increase is significantly larger at high strain rates. The failure of low-density specimens is governed by elastic and/or plastic buckling, while kink band formation and end-cap collapse dominate in higher density balsa specimens. Based on the experimental results and observations, several analytical models are proposed to predict the quasi-static compressive strength of balsa wood under uniaxial loading conditions. Results also show that the initial failure stress is very sensitive to the rate of loading, and the degree of dynamic strength enhancement is different for buckling and kink band modes. Kinematics of deformation of the observed failure modes and associated micro-inertial effects are modeled to explain this different behavior. Specific energy dissipation capacity of balsa wood was computed and is found to be comparable with those of fiber-reinforced polymer composites.
The support of the Office of Naval Research (Dr. Y. D. S. Rajapakse, program Manager) is gratefully acknowledged. GR acknowledges the support of the DoD MURI at the California Institute of Technology on Mechanics and Mechanisms of Impulse Loading, Damage and Failure of Marine Structures and Materials through the Office of Naval Research.
- 1.Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular Solids:Structure and Properties. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 2.Ashby MF, Evans A, Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG (2000) Metal Foams:A Design Guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 4.Knoell AC (1966) Environmental and physical effects of the response of balsa wood as an energy dissipator. JPL Technical Report No. 32–944, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CAGoogle Scholar
- 6.Easterling KE, Harrysson R, Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1982) On the mechanics of balsa and other woods. Proc Roy Soc London A383:31–41Google Scholar
- 8.Daigle DL, Lonborg JO (1961) Evaluation of certain crushable materials. JPL Technical Report No. 32–120, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CAGoogle Scholar
- 12.Hahn JJ (1981) Wood-based composites. In:Wangaard FF (Ed.) Wood:Its Structure and Properties. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, pp. 401–427Google Scholar
- 13.Dinwoodie JM (1975) Timber —a review of the structure-mechanical property relationship. J Microscopy 4(1):3–32Google Scholar
- 15.Kolsky H (1949) An investigation of mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc Roy Soc London B62:676–700Google Scholar
- 20.Timoshenko S (1936) Theory of Elastic Stability. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 324–418Google Scholar
- 21.Wangaard FF, (1950) The Mechanical Properties of Wood. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 22.Mark RE (1967) Cell Wall Mechanics of Tracheids. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
- 28.Rosen VW (1965) Mechanics of composite strengthening. In:Fiber Composite Materials, American Society of Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, pp. 37–75Google Scholar
- 29.Argon A (1972) Fracture of composites. In:Herman, H (Ed.), Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, vol.1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 79–114Google Scholar