Advertisement

Introduction: Chinese Buddhist Philosophy and Its “Other”

  • Youru WangEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy book series (DCCP, volume 9)

Abstract

This introduction consists of two sections. The first section focuses on the understanding of the nature and identity of Chinese Buddhist philosophy by delving into the relationship of Chinese Buddhist philosophy with its other. This “other” mainly involves Indian Buddhist philosophy, Daoist and Confucian philosophies, and Western philosophy in modern time. The section pays attention to the subversive process of the Chinese assimilation of Indian Buddhist philosophy, a process of interaction, interchange and interpenetration, which is conditioned by multiple social-historical, linguistic-conceptual and practical factors. The process defies the clear-cut distinction of assimilator and assimilated. The outcome is close to something that is neither originally Indian nor originally Chinese. In modern time this dynamic relationship with the other is extended to Western philosophy. The section conducts a survey of this relationship, and promotes a mutual inclusive attitude towards, and benefiting from, each other. The second section offers the outline for each of the remaining 17 chapters.

Keywords

Chinese Buddhist philosophy Indian Buddhism Confucianism Daoism Western philosophy Assimilation Interaction Other 

References

  1. Abe Chōichi 阿部肇一. 1986. Chūgoku zenshūshi no kenkyū: seiji shakaishi-teki kōsatsu 中國禪宗史の研究: 政治社會史的考察 (The Revised Study of the History of Chinese Chan Buddhism: An Examination of Its Political-Social History). Enlarged and revised edition. Tokyo: Kenbun shuppan.Google Scholar
  2. Ch’en, Kenneth. 1964. Buddhism in China: A Historical Survey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Clarke, J. J., 1997. Oriental Enlightenment: The Encounter between Asian and Western Thought. London and New York: Routledge,Google Scholar
  4. Defoort, Carine. 2006. “Is ‘Chinese Philosophy’ a Proper Name? A Response to Rein Raud.” Philosophy East and West 56.4: 625–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Derrida, Jacques. 1984. “Deconstruction and the Other。” In Richard Kearney, ed., Dialogues with Contemporary Continental Thinkers. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 107–126.Google Scholar
  6. ———, 2002. “The Right to Philosophy from a Cosmopolitan Point of View.” In Negotiations: Interventions and Interviews 1971–2001. Ed. and Trans. by Elizabeth Rottenberg. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 329–342.Google Scholar
  7. Dessein, Bart. 2015. “Abhidharma in China: Reflections on ‘Matching Meanings’ and Xuanxue.” In Dart Dessein and Weijen Teng, eds., Text, History, and Philosophy: Abhidharma across Buddhist Scholastic Traditions. Laiden, Netherlands: Brill, 279–295.Google Scholar
  8. Faure, Bernard. 1993. Chan Insights and Oversights: An Epistemological Critique of the Chan Buddhism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Foulk, T. Griffith. 1999. “Sung Controversies Concerning the ‘Separate Transmission’ of Ch’an.” In Peter Gregory and Daniel Getz, eds., Buddhism in the Sung. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 220–294.Google Scholar
  10. Graham, A. C., trans. 1981. Chuang-tzu: The Seven Inner Chapters. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. Hinton, David, trans. 1997. Chuang Tzu: The Inner Chapters. Washington D. C.: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  12. Jiang Lansheng 江藍生 and Cao Guangshun 曹廣順. 1997. Tang Wudai Yuyan Cidian 唐五代語言詞典 (Dictionary of the Vocabulary of the Tang and Five Dynasties). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  13. Kamata Shigeo 鎌田茂雄, trans. and annotate. 1971. Zengen shosenshū tojo 禪源諸詮集都序 (Prolegomenon to the Collection of Expressions of the Chan Source). Zen no goroku 9. Tokyo: Chikuma shobō.Google Scholar
  14. Lai, Whalen. 2009. “Chinese Buddhist Philosophy from Han through Tang.” In Bo Mou, ed., History of Chinese Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge, 324–361.Google Scholar
  15. Lin, Chen-kuo and Michael Radich, eds. 2014. A Distant Mirror: Articulating Indic Ideas in Sixth and Seventh Century Chinese Buddhism. Hamburg, Germany: Hamburg University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lü Cheng 呂瀓. 1979. Zhongguo Foxue Yuanliu Luejiang 中國佛學源流略講 (Outlines of the Source and Development of Chinese Buddhism). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
  17. Makeham, John, ed. 2012. Learning to Emulate the Wise: The Genesis of Chinese Philosophy as an Academic Discipline in Twentieth-Century China. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  18. ———, ed. 2014. Transforming Consciousness: Yogācāra Thought in Modern China. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Nelson, Eric. 2017. Chinese and Buddhist Philosophy in Early Twentieth-Century German Thought. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  20. Park, Peter K. J. 2013. Africa, Asia, and the History of Philosophy: Racism in the Formation of the Philosophical Canon, 1780–1830. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  21. Poceski, Mario. 2014. “Buddhism in Chinese History.” In Mario Poceski, ed., The Wiley Blackwell Companion to East and Inner Asian Buddhism. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sharf, Robert. 2002a. Coming to Terms with Chinese Buddhism: A Reading of the Treasure Store Treatise. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———, 2002b. “On Pure Land Buddhism and Ch’an/Pure Land Syncretism in Medieval China.” T’oung Pao 88.4–5, 282–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shimuru Ryōji 志村良治. 1984. Chūgoku chūsei gohōshi kenkyū 中國中世語法史研究 (Studies in the Medieval History of Chinese Grammar). Tokyo: Santo sha.Google Scholar
  26. Thompson, John M. 2014. “Mixed up on ‘Matching Terms’ (geyi): Confusions in Cross-Cultural Translation.” In Ithamar Theodor and Zhihua Yao, eds., Brahman and Dao: Comparative Studies of Indian and Chinese Philosophy and Religion. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 231–246.Google Scholar
  27. Tuck, Andrew P. 1990. Comparative Philosophy and the Philosophy of Scholarship: On the Western interpretation of Nāgārjuna. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wang, Youru. 2017. Historical Dictionary of Chan Buddhism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  29. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged. 1993. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Weinstein, Stanley. 1987. Buddhism under the Tang. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Wright, Arthur. 1959. Buddhism in Chinese History. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Yampolsky, Philip B., trans. 1967. The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Yanagida Seizan 柳田聖山, ed. and trans. 1971. Shoki no zenshi 初期の禪史 (The Early History of Chan Buddhism). Vol. 1: Ryōga shiji ki, Den hōbō ki 楞伽師資記, 傳法宝記 (Records of the Masters and Disciples of the Lengqie [Jing], Annals of the Transmission of the Dharma Treasure). Zen no goroku 禪の語錄 2. Tokyo: Chikuma shobō.Google Scholar
  34. Zhao Dezhi 趙德志. 1994. Xiandai Xinrujia Yu Xifang Zhexue 現代新儒家與西方哲學 (Modern Neo-Confucian Thinkers and Western Philosophy). Shenyang: Liaoning Daxue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  35. Zhuangzi Yinde 莊子引得: A Concordance to Chuang Tzu. 1966. Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series, Supplement No. 20. Taibei: Chinese Materials and Research Aids Service Center.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rowan UniversityGlassboroUSA

Personalised recommendations