Strategies of Preparedness Response to Biological Warfare and Bioterrorism Threats

Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology book series (NAPSA)


Risks associated with deliberate use of biological agents against population and the needs for a strong public health system are well recognized. The potential use of biological agents is mounting every day, especially with growing political dissidence as well as social and economical conflicts in several countries. Countries in Eastern Europe have considerable vulnerability because of economical, social and political difficulties they are facing, along with inadequate response capacity and large number of outfits having continuous low intensity conflicts with established administrative system. There are no doubts that preparedness against biological weapons must be integrated in national disaster preparedness plan, as well as strengthen the core competencies of public health and other national and local authorities to respond to biological crisis, along with strong collaboration with other national agencies, like intelligence, defense and police.


Bioterrorism biological agents preparedness public health 


  1. 1.
    Christopher, G.W. et al., Biological Warfare: A Historical Perspective, JAMA 278(5):412, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Health Policy Forum/Issue Brief No. 731(, accessed on 03/10/2008).
  3. 3.
    Pliambangchang S., Strategies of Preparedness Against the Threat of Biological warfare and Bioterrorism I South-East Asia, Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 8(1):77–98, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    David Franz Testimony to the Senate Judiciary's Subcommittee on Technology, Terrorism, and Government Information, 1994, March 4,, accessed on 28 September 2008.
  5. 5.
    Horn, J.K., Bacterial Agents Used for Bioterrorism, Surgical Infections 4(3):281–287, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    CDC, Biological and Chemical Terrorism: Strategic Plan for Preparedness and Response. Recommendations of the CDC Strategic Planning Group. MMWR 44:RR-4, 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mughal M.A., Biological Terrorism: Practical Response Strategies. CML Army Chemical Review, 34–38, July, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Paul
    • 1
  1. 1.Support Service Logistic Support Division Department of Field Support United NationsNew YorkUnited States

Personalised recommendations