Advertisement

Risicosignalering en risicomanagement

  • H. I. J. Wildschut
  • P. M. Offerhaus
  • T. J. Roseboom
  • W. Otten
Chapter

Samenvatting

Risicosignalering en -management zijn belangrijke aspecten van geboortezorg. De diverse definities van risico worden beschreven, evenals de communicatie over risico’s met de (aanstaande) ouders en de knelpunten hierin.

Literatuur

  1. Aalhuizen I. Eindrapportage project ‘Gelijke kansen voor optimale zwangerschap’. Utrecht: Koninklijke Nederlandse Organisatie van Verloskundigen (KNOV); 2011. Bron: https://www.knov.nl/fms/file/knov.nl/knov_downloads/995/file/Evaluatie%20Project%20gelijke%20kansen%20%20opgemaakt%20Ingrid%20doc.pdf.
  2. Akker T van den, Roosmalen J van. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity in a migration perspective. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;32:26–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.08.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backett EM, Davies AM, Petros-Barvazian A. The risk approach in health care. With special reference to maternal and child health, including family planning. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1984. Public Health Papers 76.Google Scholar
  4. Barker DJ. The origins of the developmental origins theory. J Intern Med. 2007;261(5):412–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker DJP, Osmond C. Infant mortality, childhood nutrition and ischaemic heart disease in England and Wales. Lancet 1986;i:1077–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker DJP, Winter PD, Osmond C, Margetts B, Simmonds SJ. Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease. Lancet 1989;ii:577–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bluman LG, Rimer BK, Berry DA, Borstelmann N, Iglehart JD, Regan K, Schildkraut J, Winer EP. Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(3):1040–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolten N, Jonge A de, Zwagerman E, Zwagerman P, Klomp T, Zwart JJ, Geerts CC. Effect of planned place of birth on obstetric interventions and maternal outcomes among low-risk women: a cohort study in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):329. PubMed PMID: 27793112; PubMed Central PMCID:PMC5084314.Google Scholar
  9. Bonsel GJ, Birnie E, Denktaş S, Poeran J, Steegers EAP. Lijnen in de perinatale sterfte. Signalementstudie zwangerschap en geboorte 2010. Rotterdam: Erasmus MC; 2010.Google Scholar
  10. Brand T, Ruiz van Haperen VWT, Vliet-Lachotzki EH van, Steegers EAP. Effecten van arbeidsomstandigheden op de zwangerschap verdienen aandacht binnen de preconceptiezorg. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:A363.Google Scholar
  11. Dean SV, Lassi ZS, Imam AM, Bhutta ZA. Preconception care: nutritional risks and interventions. Reprod Health. 2014 Sep 26;11(Suppl 3):S3.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3-S3. Epub 2014 Sep 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delcore L, Lacoursiere DY. Preconception care of the obese woman. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;59(1):129–39.  https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.000000000000018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. De-Regil LM, Peña-Rosas JP, Fernández-Gaxiola AC, Rayco-Solon P. Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 14;(12):CD007950.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.
  14. Dillen J van, Mesman JA, Zwart JJ, Bloemenkamp KW, Roosmalen J van. Audit ernstige maternale morbiditeit in Nederland. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155:A2541.Google Scholar
  15. Eriksson JG. Developmental origins of health and disease – from a small body size at birth to epigenetics. Ann Med. 2016;48(6):456–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Essed GGM. Optimale verloskundige zorg. Een WHO-rapport. Nederlands Tijdsch Geneeskd. 1977. Bron: https://www.ntvg.nl/artikelen/optimale-verloskundige-zorg-wereldwijd-een-who-rapport/volledig.
  17. Federatie Medische Specialisten. Visiedocument Medisch Specialist 2025. Ambitie, vertrouwen, samenwerken. Utrecht: FMF; 2017. Bron: https://www.demedischspecialist.nl/sites/default/files/Visiedocument%20Medisch%20Specialist%202025-DEF.pdf.
  18. Fischhoff B. Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. Risk Anal. 1995;15(2):137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gezondheidsraad. Preconceptiezorg: voor een goed begin. Den Haag: Gezondheidsraad; 2007. Publicatienr. 2007/19. Bron: https://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/sites/default/files/200719_0.pdf.
  20. Godfrey K, Robinson S, Barker DJ, Osmond C, Cox V. Maternal nutrition in early and late pregnancy in relation to placental and fetal growth. BMJ 1996;312:410–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graaf JP de, Merkus HMWM, Bonsel GJ, Steegers EAP. Nederlandse geboortezorg in historisch perspectief. Wonderbaby en zorgenkind. Rotterdam: Erasmus MC; 2017.Google Scholar
  22. Graaf JP de, Schutte JM, Poeran JJ, Roosmalen J van, Bonsel GJ, Steegers EA. Regional differences in Dutch maternal mortality. BJOG 2012;119(5):582–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03283.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greene MF. Vaginal birth after cesarean revisited. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 16;351(25):2647–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gunning-Schepers LJ. Grondslagen van preventie. In: Maas PJ van der, Mackenbach JP, redactie. Volksgezondheid en gezondheidszorg. Utrecht: Wetenschappelijke uitgeverij Bunge; 1995. pag. 139–87.Google Scholar
  25. Gunning-Schepers LJ. Dwalingen in de methodologie. V. De preventieparadox: weinigen met hoog risico versus velen met matig risico. Ned Tijdsch Geneeskd. 1998;142:1870–3.Google Scholar
  26. Haines HM, Rubertsson C, Pallant JF, Hildingsson I. The influence of women’s fear, attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012 Jun 24;12:55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall KH. Reviewing intuitive decision-making and uncertainty: the implications for medical education. Med Educ. 2002;36(3):216–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hall WA, Stoll K, Hutton EK, Brown H. A prospective study of effects of psychological factors and sleep on obstetric interventions, mode of birth, and neonatal outcomes among low-risk British Columbian women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Aug 3;12:78. PubMed PMID: 22862846; PubMed Central PMCID:PMC3449197.Google Scholar
  29. Healy S, Humphreys E, Kennedy C. Midwives’ and obstetricians’ perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: an integrative review. Women Birth. 2016;29(2):107–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.08.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirshberg A, Srinivas SK. Epidemiology of maternal morbidity and mortality. Semin Perinatol. 2017 Aug 17. pii: S0146-0005(17)30079-4.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, Horst H van der, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, Leonard B, Lorig K, Loureiro MI, Meer JW van der, Schnabel P, Smith R, Weel C van, Smid H. How should we define health? BMJ 2011 Jul 26;343:d4163.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd (IGJ). Verloskundige samenwerkingsverbanden: acute zorg veiliger, preventie is blijven liggen. Utrecht: IGJ; 2014. Bron: http://igz.nl/Images/2014-06%20Verloskundige%20samenwerkingsverbanden_tcm294-351518.pdf.
  33. Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd (IGJ). Thematisch toezicht geboortezorg: afsluitend onderzoek naar de invoering van de normen van ‘Een goed begin’. De stand van zaken in de Verloskundige Samenwerkingsverbanden (VSV’s) in Nederland op 1 november 2015. Utrecht: IGJ; 2016. Bron: https://www.igz.nl/zoeken/document.aspx?doc=Thematisch+toezicht+geboortezorg%3A+Afsluitend+onderzoek+naar+de+invoering+van+de+normen+van+%E2%80%98Een+goed+begin%E2%80%99&docid=9729.
  34. Ioannides AS. Preconception and prenatal genetic counselling. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;42:2–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.04.003. Epub 2017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jonge A de, Mesman JA, Manniën J, Zwart JJ, Dillen J van, Roosmalen J van. Severe adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in the Netherlands: nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2013 Jun 13;346:f3263.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kahneman D. Ons feilbare denken. Thinking, fast and slow. Business Contact; 2011.Google Scholar
  37. Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014 Sep 13;384(9947):980–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60696-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kloosterman GJ. De verloskundige organisatie. In: Kloosterman GJ, et al., redactie. De voortplanting van de mens. Leerboek voor obstetrie en gynaecologie. Bussum: Uitgeversmaatschappij Centen; 1973. pag. 736–9.Google Scholar
  39. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O’Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM, Gabbe SG; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 16;351(25):2581–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. A metasynthesis of risk perception in women with high risk pregnancies. Midwifery 2014;30(4):403–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. Risk perception and choice of place of birth in women with high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study. Midwifery 2016;38:49–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Leschot NJ. ‘Multifactoriële aandoeningen in het genomics-tijdperk’; kanttekeningen bij een recent rapport van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Oct 28;150(43):2350–2.Google Scholar
  43. Lewis AJ, Austin E, Knapp R, Vaiano T, Galbally M. Perinatal maternal mental health, fetal programming and child development. Healthcare (Basel). 2015 Nov 26;3(4):1212–27.  https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare3041212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lipkus IM. Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Med Decis Mak. 2007;27(5):696–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lumey LH, Stein AD, Susser E. Prenatal famine and adult health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:237–62.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Nederlandse Zorgautoriteit (NZa). Standpunten 2015 – beoordeling modelovereenkomsten en reglementen. NZa 2015 Bron: https://www.nza.nl/regelgeving/bijlagen/Standpunten_2015_beoordeling_modelovereenkomsten_en_reglementen.
  47. NICE clinical guideline 138. Recommendation 1.5.24. Patient experience in adult NHS services: improving the experience of care for people using NHS services. 2012. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg138/chapter/1-Guidance#enabling-patients-to-actively-participate-in-their-care.
  48. Pal-de Bruin KM van der, Cessie S le, Elsinga J, Jong-Potjer LC de, Haeringen A van, Neven AK, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Assendelft P. Pre-conception counselling in primary care: prevalence of risk factors among couples contemplating pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008;22(3):280–7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00930.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peters E. Beyond comprehension: the role of numeracy in judgments and decisions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21:31–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peters IA, Schölmerich VLN, Veen DW van, Steegers EAP, Denktaş S. Reproductive health peer education for multicultural target groups. J Multicult Educ. 2014; 8(3):162–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poeran J, Maas AF, Birnie E, Denktas S, Steegers EA, Bonsel GJ. Social deprivation and adverse perinatal outcomes among Western and non-Western pregnant women in a Dutch urban population. Soc Sci Med. 2013;83:42–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poeran J, Steegers EA, Bonsel GJ. De aanpak van perinatale sterfte in Nederland: uitkomst van een systematisch expert onderzoek. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;155(31):A4499. Dutch. PubMed PMID: 22853761.Google Scholar
  53. Posthumus AG, Birnie E, Veen MJ van, Steegers EA, Bonsel GJ. An antenatal prediction model for adverse birth outcomes in an urban population: the contribution of medical and non-medical risks. Midwifery 2016;38:78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pozzo ML, Brusati V, Cetin I. Clinical relationship and psychological experience of hospitalization in “high-risk” pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;149(2):136–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.12.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol. 1985;14(1):32–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roseboom TJ. De eerste 1.000 dagen. Het fundamentele belang van een goed begin vanuit biologisch, medisch en maatschappelijk perspectief. Utrecht; De Tijdstroom; 2018.Google Scholar
  57. Seely EW, Solomon CG. Improving the prediction of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):83–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sigling HO, Duin FL van, Thomassen JFM. Bevalling, een natuurlijk gebeuren? I: Een theoretische beschouwing over de rol van de verloskundige. Medisch Contact 1979;44:1411–4.Google Scholar
  59. Steegers EA. Embryonale gezondheid en preconceptiezorg. Belang voor huidige en toekomstige generaties. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A7373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Steegers EA, Barker ME, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Williams MA. Societal valorisation of new knowledge to improve perinatal health: Time to Act. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2016;30(2):201–4.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12275.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Steegers-Theunissen RP, Steegers EA. Embryonic health: new insights, mHealth and personalised patient care. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015;27(4):712–5.  https://doi.org/10.1071/RD14386.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Stoll K, Edmonds JK, Hall WA. Fear of childbirth and preference for Cesarean delivery among young American women before childbirth: a survey study. Birth 2015;42(3):270–6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Struijs A, Jongsma K. Gezamenlijke besluitvorming door zorgverlener en patiënt – normatieve achtergrond. Raad voor Volksgezondheid en Zorg (RVZ). 2013. Bron: https://www.ceg.nl/uploads/publicaties/temp_file_Achtergrondstudie_Gezamenlijke_besluitvorming_zorgverlener_patient1.pdf.
  64. Temel S, Voorst SF van, Jong-Potjer LC de, Waelput AJ, Cornel MC, Weerd SR de, Denktaş S, Steegers EA. The Dutch national summit on preconception care: a summary of definitions, evidence and recommendations. J Community Genet. 2015;6(1):107–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tijmstra TJ, Bajema C. ‘Je zult die ene maar zijn’; risicobeleving en keuzegedrag rond medische technologie. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990;134:1884–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Tijssen JGP, Assendelft WJJ. In: Offringa M, Assendelft WJJ, Scholten RJPM, redactie. Inleiding in evidence-based medicine. Klinisch handelen gebaseerd op bewijsmateriaal. 2de, herziene druk. Houten/Antwerpen: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum; 2003. pag. 184–90.Google Scholar
  67. Timmermans DR. Informatie is meer dan alleen het getal. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2016;160(0):D825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Timmermans DR, Ockhuysen-Vermey CF, Henneman L. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants’ cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):443–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Vandenbroucke JP, Hofman A, redactie. Grondslagen der epidemiologie. 4de druk. Houten: Wetenschappelijke uitgeverij Bunge; 1993.Google Scholar
  70. Veen MJ van, Birnie E, Poeran J, Torij HW, Steegers EA, Bonsel GJ. Feasibility and reliability of a newly developed antenatal risk score card in routine care. Midwifery 2015;31(1):147–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Veenendaal MV, Costello PM, Lillycrop KA, Rooij SR de, Post JA van der, Bossuyt PM, Hanson MA, Painter RC, Roseboom TJ. Prenatal famine exposure, health in later life and promoter methylation of four candidate genes. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2012;3(6):450–7.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040174412000396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Veldhuizen-Eshuis H van, Wieringa J. Advies stroomlijnen van informatie over preconceptiezorg. Rapport 225101001/2009. Bilthoven: RIVM; 2012. Bron: http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=b68bf968-024e-4204-86bc-089f825eb788&type=org&disposition=inline.
  73. Verloskundig Vademecum. Eindrapport van de Commissie Verloskunde van het College voor zorgverzekeringenverloskundig. Diemen: College voor Zorgverzekeringen; 2003. Bron: https://www.knov.nl/serve/file/knov.nl/knov_downloads/769/file/Verloskundig%20Vademecum%202003.pdf.
  74. Visschers VH, Meertens RM, Passchier WW, Vries NN de. Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature. Risk Anal. 2009;29(2):267–87.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Visser J. Interview Machteld Huber: ‘het vermogen om zelf de regie te voeren.’ Medisch Contact 2014;6:246–8.Google Scholar
  76. Vos AA, Voorst SF van, Steegers EA, Denktaş S. Analysis of policy towards improvement of perinatal mortality in the Netherlands (2004–2011). Soc Sci Med. 2016;157:156–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vries NK de. Risico’s en risicoperceptie. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2002;109:202–6.Google Scholar
  78. Weerd S de, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Boo TM de, Thomas CM, Steegers EA. Maternal periconceptional biochemical and hematological parameters, vitamin profiles and pregnancy outcome. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(9):1128–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zwart JJ, Jonkers MD, Richters A, Ӧry F, Bloemenkamp KW, Duvekot JJ, Roosmalen J van. Ethnic disparity in severe acute maternal morbidity: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Eur J Public Health. 2011;21(2):229–34.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ӧry F, Vries JI de, Bloemenkamp KW, Roosmalen J van. Severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy, delivery and puerperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study of 371,000 pregnancies. BJOG 2008;115(7):842–50.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01713.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Öry F, Vries JI de, Bloemenkamp KW, Roosmalen J van. Ernstige maternale morbiditeit tijdens zwangerschap, bevalling en kraambed in Nederland. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009 Apr 11;153(15):691–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum is een imprint van Springer Media B.V., onderdeel van Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. I. J. Wildschut
    • 1
  • P. M. Offerhaus
    • 2
  • T. J. Roseboom
    • 3
  • W. Otten
    • 4
  1. 1.Wildschut ConsultancyEnkhuizenNederland
  2. 2.Midwifery Science, Academie Verloskunde Maastricht/hogeschool ZuydMaastrichtNederland
  3. 3.Afdeling Verloskunde en gynaecologieAMC, Universiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamNederland
  4. 4.Child HealthTNOLeidenNederland

Personalised recommendations