Advertisement

Kwaliteit van zorg

  • H. I. J. Wildschut
  • A. de Jonge
  • S. Denktaş
  • P. W. Achterberg
  • S. E. M. Truijens
  • I. C. Boesveld
  • G. de Winter
Chapter

Samenvatting

Nadat het begrip ‘kwaliteit van zorg’ wordt toegelicht, gaat dit hoofdstuk in op kwaliteit van zorg bij geboortezorg. Hoe kunnen de wetenschappelijke inzichten kunnen worden toegepast, wat zijn de belangen van de cliënten en hoe kan een en ander op een inzichtelijke wijze worden geregistreerd?

Literatuur

  1. Aarts JWM, Custers IM. Praktijkvariatie in beeld. Diabetes gravidarum. Eerste protocolbespreking in nieuwe rubriek. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;127:467–72. Bron: http://www.ntog.nl/dynamic/media/3/documents/NTOG_2014_9-web.pdf.
  2. Baumhauer JF. Patient-reported outcomes – are they living up to their potential? N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):6–9.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1702978. PubMed PMID: 28679102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beer JJA de, Kuijpers T, namens de Werkgroep GRADE_NL. Toepassen van GRADE in Nederland. 2012. https://www.zorginzicht.nl/kennisbank/PublishingImages/Paginas/Tool-GRADE-voor-interventies/Rapport%20toepassen%20GRADE%20in%20Nederland.pdf.
  4. Bensing J. Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39(1):17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berwick DM. What ‘patient-centered’ should mean: confessions of an extremist. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(4):w555–65.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w555. Epub 2009 May 19. PubMed PMID: 19454528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhatia M, Rifkin SB. Primary health care, now and forever? A case study of a paradigm change. Int J Health Serv. 2013;43(3):459–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boluyt N, Rottier BL, Langendam MW. Richtlijnen worden transparanter met de GRADE-methode: nieuwe methode maakt overwegingen bij aanbevelingen expliciet. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(25):A4379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonsel GJ, Birnie E, Denktaş S, Poeran J, Steegers EAP. Signalementstudie ‘Zwangerschap en Geboorte’. Lijnen in de perinatale sterfte. Rotterdam: Erasmus MC; 2010. ISBN 978-90-9025544-6.Google Scholar
  9. Braspenning J, Hermes R, Calsbeek H, Grol R. Kwaliteit en veiligheid in de zorg: de rol van indicatoren. In: Grol R, Wensing M, redactie. Implementatie. Effectieve verbetering van de patiëntenzorg. Vijfde druk. Amsterdam: Reeds Business Education; 2011. pag. 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brettschneider C, Lühmann D, Raspe H. Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA). GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb 2;7:Doc01.  https://doi.org/10.3205/hta000092.
  11. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Buetow SA. Defining quality of care. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(11):1611–25. PubMed PMID: 11072882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, redactie. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1989.Google Scholar
  13. Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJ. Preparing and updating systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health care. Milbank Q. 1993;71(3):411–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crowley PA. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials, 1972 to 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(1):322–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ. The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ 2010 Jan 18;340:c186.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards M. Evidence. Lancet 2004 May 15;363(9421):1657.Google Scholar
  17. Elferink-Stinkens PM, Brand R, Cessie S le, Hemel OJ van. Large differences in obstetrical intervention rates among Dutch hospitals, even after adjustment for population differences. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;68(1–2):97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elferink-Stinkens PM, Hemel OJ van, Hermans MP. Obstetric characteristics profiles as quality assessment of obstetric care. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993;51(2):85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Enkin M, Glouberman S, Groff P, Jadad AR, Stern A; Clinamen Collaboration. Beyond evidence: the complexity of Maternal Care. Birth 2006;33(4):265–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00117.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eskes M, Waelput AJ, Erwich JJ, Brouwers HA, Ravelli AC, Achterberg PW, Merkus HJ, Bruinse HW. Term perinatal mortality audit in the Netherlands 2010–2012: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2014 Oct 14;4(10):e005652.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Everdingen JJE van, Dreesens DHH, redactie. Glossarium kwaliteit van zorg. Houten: Bohn Stafleu en van Loghum; 2011.Google Scholar
  22. Everdingen JJE, Dreesens DHH, Burgers JS, Swinkels JA, Barneveld T van, Weijden T van de, redactie. Handboek evidence-based richtlijnontwikkeling. Een leidraad voor de praktijk. Houten: Bohn Stafleu en van Loghum; 2014. Google Scholar
  23. Everdingen JJ van, Dreesens DH, Tuut MK. Regie over richtlijnen. Plannen voor richtlijnontwikkeling in Nederland. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A1599.Google Scholar
  24. Evers AC, Brouwers HA, Hukkelhoven CW, Nikkels PG, Boon J, Egmond-Linden A van, Hillegersberg J, Snuif YS, Sterken-Hooisma S, Bruinse HW, Kwee A. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2010 Nov 2;341:c5639.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, Kistnasamy B, Meleis A, Naylor D, Pablos-Mendez A, Reddy S, Scrimshaw S, Sepulveda J, Serwadda D, Zurayk H. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1923–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gezondheidsraad: Beraadsgroep Geneeskunde. Medisch handelen op een tweesprong. Hen Haag: Gezondheidsraad; 1991. Publicatienr. 1991/23.Google Scholar
  27. Gleeson H, Calderon A, Swami V, Deighton J, Wolpert M, Edbrooke-Childs J. Systematic review of approaches to using patient experience data for quality improvement in healthcare settings. BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 16;6(8):e011907.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011907. PubMed PMID: 27531733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodwin N. Understanding integrated care: a complex process, a fundamental principle. Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 22;13:e011.Google Scholar
  29. Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N; Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance Group. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ 2014 Jun 13;348:g3725.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Groenen C, Jonge A de. Zonder context geen bewijs. Over het onjuist gebruik van evidence-based practice in de zorg. Tijdschr Verloskundig. 2018;1:6–7.Google Scholar
  31. Guthrie B, Saultz JW, Freeman GK, Haggerty JL. Continuity of care matters. BMJ 2008 Aug 7;337:a867.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a867. PubMed PMID: 18687724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219–21. Review. PubMed PMID: 14630762; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC274066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, Horst H van der, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, Leonard B, Lorig K, Loureiro MI, Meer JW van der, Schnabel P, Smith R, Weel C van, Smid H. How should we define health? BMJ 2011 Jul 26;343:d4163.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jonge A de, Sandall J. Improving research into models of maternity care to inform decision making. PLoS Med. 2016 Sep 27;13(9):e1002135.Google Scholar
  35. Jonge A de, Geerts CC, Goes BY van der, Mol BW, Buitendijk SE, Nijhuis JG. Perinatal mortality and morbidity up to 28 days after birth among 743 070 low-risk planned home and hospital births: a cohort study based on three merged national perinatal databases. BJOG 2015a;122(5):720–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jonge A de, Vries R de, Lagro-Janssen AL, Malata A, Declercq E, Downe S, Hutton EK. The importance of evaluating primary midwifery care for improving the health of women and infants. Front Med (Lausanne). 2015b Mar 23;2:17.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2015.00017.
  37. Jonge A de, Wouters M, Klinkert J, Brandenbarg J, Zwart JJ, Dillen J van, Horst HE van der, Schellevis FG. Pitfalls in the use of register-based data for comparing adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in different birth settings. BJOG 2017;124(10):1477–80.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelly MP, Heath I, Howick J, Greenhalgh T. The importance of values in evidence-based medicine. BMC Med Ethics 2015 Oct 12;16(1):69.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0063-3.
  39. Ketelaar NA, Faber MJ, Braspenning JC, Westert GP. Patients’ expectations of variation in quality of care relates to their search for comparative performance information. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 3;14:617.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0617-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kringos DS, Boerma WG, Bourgueil Y, Cartier T, Hasvold T, Hutchinson A, Lember M, Oleszczyk M, Pavlic DR, Svab I, Tedeschi P, Wilson A, Windak A, Dedeu T, Wilm S. The European primary care monitor: structure, process and outcome indicators. BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Oct 27;11:81.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kringos DS, Boerma W, Zee J van der, Groenewegen P. Europe’s strong primary care systems are linked to better population health but also to higher health spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(4):686–94.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Legemaate J, Wedema F. Kwaliteit van Zorg. In: Leegemaate J, Widdershoven G, redactie. Basisboek ethiek en recht in de gezondheidszorg. Amsterdam: Boom Uitgevers; 2016. pag. 201–20.Google Scholar
  43. Lombarts K. Performance van artsen. Rotterdam: Rotterdam Uitgevers; 2016. ISBN-10 9490951307.Google Scholar
  44. Meurs P. Van regeldruk naar passende regels: vertrouwen, veerkracht, verantwoordelijkheid en vrijheid. Essay op verzoek van het Ministerie van VWS en van de leden van de Agenda voor de Zorg. 22 juni 2014; Rapport bij kamerbrief (referentie 628938-122911-MC) van minister E. Schippers aan de voorzitter van de Tweede kamer der Starten Generaal. Den Haag, 18 juli 2014. Bron: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2014/07/18/van-regeldruk-naar-passende-regels.
  45. Moore G, Redman S, D’Este C, Makkar S, Turner T. Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals? A before and after study. Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 28;6(1):23.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0411-0.
  46. Nieuwenhuijze M. On Speaking terms. Choice and shared decision-making in maternity care. Academisch Proefschrift Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. Enschede: Ipskamp Drukkers; 2014.Google Scholar
  47. Paternotte E, Dulmen S van, Lee N van der, Scherpbier AJ, Scheele F. Factors influencing intercultural doctor-patient communication: a realist review. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(4):420–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perdok H, Jans S, Verhoeven C, Henneman L, Wiegers T, Mol BW, Schellevis F, Jonge A de. Opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders about integration of maternity care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016 Jul 26;16(1):188.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0975-z.
  49. Perdok H, Verhoeven CJ, Dillen J van, Schuitmaker TJ, Hoogendoorn K, Colli J, Schellevis FG, Jonge A de. Continuity of care is an important and distinct aspect of childbirth experience: findings of a survey evaluating continuity, experienced quality of care and women’s perception of labor. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018 Jan 8;18(1):13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1615-y.
  50. Raad van Volksgezondheid en Samenleving (RVS). Zonder context geen bewijs. Over de illusie van evidence-based practice in de zorg. Den Haag: RVS; 2017. Publicatie 17-05 ISBN: 987-90-5732-267-9.Google Scholar
  51. Raven JH, Tolhurst RJ, Tang S, Broek N van den. What is quality in maternal and neonatal health care? Midwifery 2012;28(5):e676–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, Silva DR, Downe S, Kennedy HP, Malata A, McCormick F, Wick L, Declercq E. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1129–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60789-3. Epub 2014 Jun 22. Review. Erratum in: Lancet 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1098. PubMed PMID: 24965816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rijksoverheid. Kamerbrief over uitkomsttransparantie samen beslissen. Kenmerk: 1088120-160700-MC. 2017. Bron: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2017/02/21/kamerbrief-over-uitkomsttransparantie-voor-samen-beslissen.
  54. Roberts D, Brown J, Medley N, Dalziel SR. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(3). Art. No.: CD004454.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub3.
  55. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. 1996. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:3–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Scheerhagen M, Stel HF van, Birnie E, Franx A, Bonsel GJ. Measuring client experiences in maternity care under change: development of a questionnaire based on the WHO Responsiveness model. PLoS One 2015 Feb 11;10(2):e0117031.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scheerhagen M, Stel HF van, Tholhuijsen DJ, Birnie E, Franx A, Bonsel GJ. Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care. Peer J. 2016 Jul 13;4:e2092.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schoemaker C, Everdingen J van, Loon J van. De toekomst van richtlijnen. Een verkenning aan de hand van de vier perspectieven van de VTV-2014. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;159:A8347.Google Scholar
  59. Schoemaker CG, Weijden T van der. Patiëntvoorkeur versus evidencebased medicine: hadden de pioniers van EBM oog voor wat de patiënt wil? Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2016;160:D24.Google Scholar
  60. Scholten RJPM, Offringa M, Assendelft WJJ, redactie. Inleiding in evidence-based medicine. Klinisch handelen gebaseerd op bewijsmateriaal. Vierde herziene druk. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2013.Google Scholar
  61. Shaw D, Guise JM, Shah N, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Joseph KS, Levy B, Wong F, Woodd S, Main EK. Drivers of maternity care in high-income countries: can health systems support woman-centred care? Lancet 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2282–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31527-6. Erratum in: Lancet 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sosa CG, Althabe F, Belizán JM, Bergel E. Bed rest in singleton pregnancies for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 30;(3):CD003581.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003581.pub3.
  63. Stegeman JH. Gezel bij moderne meesters. Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs. 2009;28(2):65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stralen G van, Schmidt Auf Altenstadt JF von, Bloemenkamp KW, Roosmalen J van, Hukkelhoven CW. Increasing incidence of postpartum hemorrhage: the Dutch piece of the puzzle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(10):1104–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Truijens SE. Patient-reported outcomes in perinatal care. Proefschrift. Eindhoven: GVO drukkers & vormgevers BV; 2016. ISBN: 978-90-386-4120-1.Google Scholar
  66. Truijens SE, Pommer AM, Runnard Heimel PJ van, Verhoeven CJ, Oei SG, Pop VJ. Development of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Questionnaire (PCQ): evaluating quality of care as perceived by women who recently gave birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014a;174:35–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Truijens SE, Wijnen HA, Pommer AM, Oei SG, Pop VJ. Development of the Childbirth Perception Scale (CPS): perception of delivery and the first postpartum week. Arch Womens Ment Health 2014b;17(5):411–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-014-0420-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Uijen AA, Schellevis FG, Bosch WJ van den, Mokkink HG, Weel C van, Schers HJ. Nijmegen continuity questionnaire: development and testing of a questionnaire that measures continuity of care. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1391–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Uijen AA, Schers HJ, Schellevis FG, Mokkink HG, Weel C van, Bosch WJ van den. Measuring continuity of care: psychometric properties of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(600):e949–57.  https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X652364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Valentine NB, Bonsel GJ, Murray CJ. Measuring quality of health care from the user’s perspective in 41 countries: psychometric properties of WHO’s questions on health systems responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(7):1107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weenink JW, Braspenning J, Wensing M. Patient reported outcome measures (PROM’s) in primary care: an observational pilot study of seven generic instruments. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;6(15):88.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wiegers TA. The quality of maternity care services as experienced by women in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009 May 9;9:18.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-18. PubMed PMID: 19426525; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2689853.
  73. World Health Organization. Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. 2016. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/249155/1/9789241511216-eng.pdf?ua=1.
  74. Zeitlin J, Mohangoo AD, Delnord M, Cuttini M; EURO-PERISTAT Scientific Committee. The second European Perinatal Health Report: documenting changes over 6 years in the health of mothers and babies in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Dec 1;67(12):983–5.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-203291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zorginstituut Nederland (ZiN). Relevante partijen: hoe betrekt ik koepel-/branchorganisatie? 2015. https://www.zorginzicht.nl/kennisbank/Documents/Leeswijzer-Hoe_betrekt_u_uw_koepel-brancheorganisatie.pdf.
  76. Zorgstandaard Integrale Geboortezorg versie 1.1. 2016. Bron: https://www.zorginzicht.nl/bibliotheek/integrale-geboortezorg-zorgstandaard/Paginas/Home.aspx.

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum is een imprint van Springer Media B.V., onderdeel van Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. I. J. Wildschut
    • 1
  • A. de Jonge
    • 2
  • S. Denktaş
    • 3
  • P. W. Achterberg
    • 4
  • S. E. M. Truijens
    • 5
  • I. C. Boesveld
    • 6
  • G. de Winter
    • 7
  1. 1.Wildschut ConsultancyEnkhuizenNederland
  2. 2.Afdeling Midwifery Science, Amsterdam Public Health onderzoeksinstituutAmsterdam UMCAVAG/Amsterdam UMCNederland
  3. 3.Afdeling Social & Behavioural SciencesErasmus University CollegeRotterdamNederland
  4. 4.RIVMBilthovenNederland
  5. 5.Máxima Medisch Centrum VeldhovenVeldhovenNederland
  6. 6.Den HaagNederland
  7. 7.UtrechtNederland

Personalised recommendations