Advertisement

De (aanstaande) moeder

  • H. I. J. Wildschut
  • A. J. M. Waelput
  • K. M. Paarlberg
  • M. P. Fransen
  • C. J. M. Groenen
  • M. Nieuwenhuijze
  • M. Rijnders
  • J. C. Mooij
Chapter

Samenvatting

Verschillende factoren rond integrale geboortezorg zijn van specifiek belang voor de (aanstaande) moeder en haar kind. Besproken wordt hoe met goede communicatie en duidelijke informatie naar een gezamenlijke besluitvorming toegewerkt kan worden. Knelpunten, zoals onmogelijke keuzes, onverwachte situaties of tekortschietende vaardigheden bij de (aanstaande) moeder, komen aan bod. Tot slot wordt ingegaan op verschillende vormen van zwangerschapsbegeleiding.

Literatuur

  1. Agt HME van, Schoonen HMHJD, Fracheboud J, Koning HJ de. Monitor geïnformeerde besluitvorming prenatale screening 2011. Landelijke en regionale uitkomsten. RIVM 2012. http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=7bea4619-78b3-4b93-8483-d515b89dd710&type=org&disposition=inline.
  2. Anonymous. Praktijkperikel; Mag een arts gedwongen sectio uitvoeren in het belang van het kind? Medisch Contact 2015, pag. 1484 (auteur niet vermeld). Bron: https://www.medischcontact.nl/nieuws/laatste-nieuws/artikel/mag-een-arts-gedwongen-sectio-uitvoeren-in-het-belang-van-het-kind-1.htm.
  3. Baas CI, Erwich JJ, Wiegers TA, Cock TP de, Hutton EK. Women’s suggestions for improving midwifery care in The Netherlands. Birth 2015;42(4):369–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baas CI, Wiegers TA, Cock TP de, Erwich JJ, Spelten ER, Boer MR de, Hutton EK. Client-related factors associated with a “Less than Good” experience of midwifery care during childbirth in the Netherlands. Birth 2017;44(1):58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballen LE, Fulcher AJ. Nurses and doulas: complementary roles to provide optimal maternity care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35(2):304–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berhan Y, Haileamlak A. The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies. BJOG 2016;123(1):49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berwick DM. What ‘patient-centered’ should mean: confessions of an extremist. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(4):w555–65.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w555. Epub 2009 May 19. PubMed PMID: 19454528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beulen L, Berg M van den, Faas BH, Feenstra I, Hageman M, Vugt JM van, Bekker MN. The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24(10):1409–16.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2016.39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bijlsma MW, Wennink JM, Enkelaar AC, Heres MH, Honig A. De mogelijkheid van ondertoezichtstelling van het nog ongeboren kind bij twijfels over de veiligheid van de thuissituatie. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Apr 12;152(15):895–8. Dutch. PubMed PMID: 18512532. um Genet. 2016 May 18.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2016.39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bijma HH, Heide A van der, Wildschut HI. Decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormality. Reprod Health Matters 2008;16(31 Suppl):82–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-8080(08)31372-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blondeau MJ, Koorengevel KM, Schneider AJ, Knijff-van Dortmont AL van der, Dondorp WJ. Een sectio caesarea tegen haar wil? Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;159:A8183.Google Scholar
  12. Bloomfield J, Rising SS. CenteringPregnancy®: an innovative dyad model for group mother-infant care. J Midwifery Womens Health 2013;58(6):683–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boerleider AW, Francke AL, Manniën J, Wiegers TA, Devillé WL. “A mixture of positive and negative feelings”: a qualitative study of primary care midwives’ experiences with non-western clients living in the Netherlands. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(12):1658–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.04.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7:CD003766.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6.
  15. Brixval CS, Axelsen SF, Lauemøller SG, Andersen SK, Due P, Koushede V. The effect of antenatal education in small classes on obstetric and psycho-social outcomes – a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 28;4:20.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0010-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brom L, Hopmans W, Pasman HRW, Timmermans DR, Widdershoven GA, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. Congruence between patients’ preferred and perceived participation in medical decision-making: a review of the literature. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014;14:25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Byerley BM, Haas DM. A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017 Sep 29;17(1):329.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1522-2.
  18. Carter EB, Temming LA, Akin J, Fowler S, Macones GA, Colditz GA, Tuuli MG. Group prenatal care compared with traditional prenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):551–61.  https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001560.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there’s no going back. BMJ 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):719–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crombag NM, Lamain-de Ruiter M, Kwee A, Schielen PC, Bensing JM, Visser GH, Franx A, Koster MP. Perspectives, preferences and needs regarding early prediction of preeclampsia in Dutch pregnant women: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017 Jan 7;17(1):12.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1195-2.
  22. Demontis R, Pisu S, Pintor M, D’aloja E. Cesarean section without clinical indication versus vaginal delivery as a paradigmatic model in the discourse of medical setting decisions. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(12):1470–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Denktaş S, Bonsel GJ, Steegers EA. Perinatale Gezondheid in Rotterdam. Ervaringen na 2 jaar ‘Klaar voor een kind’. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(29):A4289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Downe S, Finlayson K, Tunçalp Ӧ, Metin Gülmezoglu A. What matters to women: a systematic scoping review to identify the processes and outcomes of antenatal care provision that are important to healthy pregnant women. BJOG 2016;123(4):529–39.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13819.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dugas M, Shorten A, Dubé E, Wassef M, Bujold E, Chaillet N. Decision aid tools to support women’s decision making in pregnancy and birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(12):1968–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dwamena F, Holmes-Rovner M, Gaulden CM, Jorgenson S, Sadigh G, Sikorskii A,Lewin S, Smith RC, Coffey J, Olomu A. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD003267.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.
  27. Ecker J. Elective cesarean delivery on maternal request. JAMA 2013 May 8;309(18):1930–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Edwards A, Elwyn G. Shared decision making in health care; achieving evidence based patient choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  29. El Bouazzaoui F, Peters IA. Handboek geboortezorg bij verschillende culturen. Tielt: Uitgeverij Lannoo nv; 2017.Google Scholar
  30. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50(460):892–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, Cording E, Tomson D, Dodd C, Rollnick S, Edwards A, Barry M. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7. Epub 2012 May 23. Review. PubMed PMID: 22618581; PubMed Central PMCID:PMC3445676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung WY, Grol R. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect. 2005;8(1):34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Elwyn G, O’Connor AM, Bennett C, Newcombe RG, Politi M, Durand MA, Drake E, Joseph-Williams N, Khangura S, Saarimaki A, Sivell S, Stiel M, Bernstein SJ, Col N, Coulter A, Eden K, Härter M, Rovner MH, Moumjid N, Stacey D, Thomson R, Whelan T, Weijden T van der, Edwards A. Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS One 2009;4(3):e4705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Enting E. Voorlichtingen in eigen taal en cultuur (VETC). Epidemiologisch Bull. 2005;40(1):26–30.Google Scholar
  35. Entsieh AA, Hallström IK. First-time parents’ prenatal needs for early parenthood preparation – a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative literature. Midwifery 2016;39:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Fabian HM, Rådestad IJ, Waldenström U. Childbirth and parenthood education classes in Sweden. Women’s opinion and possible outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(5):436–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Feeley C, Thomson G. Why do some women choose to free birth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016 Mar 21;16(1):59.Google Scholar
  38. Fransen MP, Harris V, Essink-Bot ML. Beperkte gezondheidsvaardigheden bij patiënten van allochtone herkomst: alleen een tolk inzetten is meestal niet genoeg. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157:A5581.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Fried TR. Shared decision making. Finding the sweet spot. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 14;374(2):104–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gagnon AJ, Sandall J. Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD002869.Google Scholar
  41. García E, Timmermans DR, Leeuwen E van. Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(2):115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gevers S, Metselaar S. Begin van het leven. In: Legemaate J, Widdershoven G, redactie. Basisboek ethiek en recht in de gezondheidszorg. Amsterdam: Boom uitgevers; 2016. pag. 135–60.Google Scholar
  43. Gezondheidsraad. Laaggeletterdheid te lijf. Signalering ethiek en gezondheid, 2011/1. Den Haag: Centrum voor ethiek en gezondheid; 2011. Publicatienr. Gezondheidsraad: 2011/17.Google Scholar
  44. Gitsels-van der Wal JT, Martin L, Manniën J, Verhoeven P, Hutton EK, Reinders HS. Antenatal counselling for congenital anomaly tests: pregnant Muslim Moroccan women’s preferences. Midwifery 2015;31(3):e50–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.01.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N; Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance Group. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ 2014 Jun 13;348:g3725.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Groenen CJ, Duijnhoven NT van, Faber MJ, Koetsenruijter J, Kremer JA, Vandenbussche FP. Use of social network analysis in maternity care to identify the profession most suited for case manager role. Midwifery 2016 Dec 12;45:50–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Haaren-ten Haken TM van, Hendrix MJ, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, Vries RG de, Nijhuis JG. Birth place preferences and women’s expectations and experiences regarding duration and pain of labor. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Feb 6:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2017.1285900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hall KH. Reviewing intuitive decision-making and uncertainty: the implications for medical education. Med Educ. 2002;36(3):216–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Heijmans M, Zwikker H, Heide I van der, Rademakers J. Zorg op maat. Hoe kunnen we de zorg beter laten aansluiten bij mensen met lage gezondheidsvaardigheden? Utrecht: NIVEL; 2016.Google Scholar
  50. Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(10):CD003766.Google Scholar
  51. Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah M, Lawrie TA. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 21;7:CD000166.Google Scholar
  52. Hollander MH, Dillen J van. Zorg op maat in de verloskunde, verklaard vanuit de geschiedenis. NTOG 2017;17(6):327–30.Google Scholar
  53. Hollander M, Miranda E de, Dillen J van, Graaf I de, Vandenbussche F, Holten L. Women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017a;17(1):423.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1621-0.
  54. Hollander MH, Dillen J van, Lagro-Jansen ALM, Leeuwen E van, Duijst WLJM, Vandenbussche FPHA. Moeder-kindconflict of arts-patiëntconflict? Als vrouwen aanbevolen verloskundige zorg afwijzen. NTOG 2017b;130:84–7.Google Scholar
  55. Hollander MH, Hastenberg E van, Dillen J van, Pampus MG van, Miranda E de, Stramrood CAI. Preventing traumatic childbirth experiences: 2.192 women’s perceptions and views. Arch Womens Ment Health 2017c;20(4):515–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-017-0729-6. Epub 2017 May 29. PubMed PMID: 2855369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Horey D, Kealy M, Davey MA, Small R, Crowther CA. Interventions for supporting pregnant women’s decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 30;7:CD010041.Google Scholar
  57. Hrešanová E. The psychoprophylactic method of painless childbirth in socialist Czechoslovakia: from state propaganda to activism of enthusiasts. Med Hist. 2016;60(4):534–56.  https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2016.59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd (IGJ). Thematisch toezicht geboortezorg: afsluitend onderzoek naar de invoering van de normen van ‘Een goed begin’. De stand van zaken in de Verloskundige Samenwerkingsverbanden (VSV’s) in Nederland op 1 november 2015. Utrecht: IGJ; 2016. Bron: https://www.igz.nl/zoeken/document.aspx?doc=Thematisch+toezicht+geboortezorg%3A+Afsluitend+onderzoek+naar+de+invoering+van+de+normen+van+%E2%80%98Een+goed+begin%E2%80%99.
  59. Joseph-Williams N, Edwards A, Elwyn G. Power imbalance prevents shared decision making. BMJ 2014a May 14;348:g3178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014b;94(3):291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kabakian-Khasholian T, Portela A. Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017 Aug 31;17(1):265.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1447-9.
  62. Kahneman D. Ons feilbare denken. Thinking, fast and slow. Business Contact 2011.Google Scholar
  63. Kaimal AJ, Kuppermann M. Decision making for primary cesarean delivery: the role of patient and provider preferences. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36(5):384–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:727–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Keirse E. Psychologische reflexie. In: Wildschut HIJ, Goudoever JB van, Hollander NS den, Keirse E, Wert G de, redactie. Foetale en neonatale afwijkingen op aangeboren afwijkingen. Leidraad voor besluitvorming. Amsterdam: Reed Business; 2011. pag. 387–403.Google Scholar
  66. Kelly MP, Heath I, Howick J, Greenhalgh T. The importance of values in evidence-based medicine. BMC Med Ethics 2015 Oct 12;16(1):69.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0063-3.
  67. Klaus H, Kennelll JH, Klaus PD. The doula book. How a trained labor companion can help you have a shorter, easier and healthier birth. 3rd edition. Boston: Da Capo Lifelong Books; 2012. ISBN13: 9780738215068.Google Scholar
  68. Klaver K, Baart A. How can attending physicians be more attentive? On being attentive versus producing attentiveness. Med Health Care Philos. 2016a;19(3):351–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-015-9669-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Klaver K, Baart A. Managing socio-institutional enclosure: a grounded theory of caregivers’ attentiveness in hospital care. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016b;22:95–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2016.04.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. KNOV/NVOG: Leidraad ‘Verloskundige zorg buiten richtlijnen’. Versie 1.0. Utrecht 2015. Bron: http://nvog-documenten.nl/uploaded/docs/KNOV%20en%20NVOG%20Leidraad%20Verloskundige%20zorg%20buiten%20richtlijnen%20ek.pdf.
  71. Kollen M, Heida A, Huisman A, Müller ME. Gravida en wilsombekwaam. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 Apr 20;146(16):745–7. Dutch. PubMed PMID: 11998349.Google Scholar
  72. Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H, Vijgen SM, Aarnoudse JG, Bekedam DJ, Berg PP van den, Boer K de, Burggraaff JM, Bloemenkamp KW, Drogtrop AP, Franx A, Groot CJ de, Huisjes AJ, Kwee A, Loon AJ van, Lub A, Papatsonis DN, Post JA van der, Roumen FJ, Scheepers HC, Willekes C, Mol BW, Pampus MG van; HYPITAT study group. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks’ gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009 Sep 19;374(9694):979–88.Google Scholar
  73. Kozhimannil KB, Hardeman RR, Attanasio LB, Blauer-Peterson C, O’Brien M. Doula care, birth outcomes, and costs among Medicaid beneficiaries. Am J Public Health 2013;103(4):e113–21.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Kweekel L, Gerrits T, Rijnders M, Brown P. The role of trust in CenteringPregnancy: building interpersonal trust relationships in group-based prenatal care in the Netherlands. Birth 2017;44(1):41–7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Lantz PM, Low LK, Varkey S, Watson RL. Doulas as childbirth paraprofessionals: results from a national survey. Womens Health Issues 2005;15(3):109–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Légaré F, Thompson-Leduc P. Twelve myths about shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(3):281–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Lombarts K. Performance van artsen. Rotterdam: 2010 Uitgevers; 2016. ISBN10:9490951307.Google Scholar
  78. Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(3):301–12. Epub 2005 Jul 26. Review. PubMed PMID: 16051459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Marteau TM. Towards informed decisions about prenatal testing: a review. Prenat Diagn. 1995;15(13):1215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mazzeschi C, Pazzagli C, Radi G, Raspa V, Buratta L. Antecedents of maternal parenting stress: the role of attachment style, prenatal attachment, and dyadic adjustment in first-time mothers. Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 24;6:1443.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mittal P. CenteringPregnancy®: pilot implementation of a group model for teaching family medicine residents well-child care. Perm J. 2011;15(4):40–1.Google Scholar
  82. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Integrating health literacy, cultural competence, and language access services: workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2016.  https://doi.org/10.17226/23498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. NICE clinical guideline 138. Recommendation 1.5.24. Patient experience in adult NHS services: improving the experience of care for people using NHS services. 2012. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg138/chapter/1-Guidance#enabling-patients-to-actively-participate-in-their-care.
  84. Nieuwenhuijze M. On speaking terms. Choice and shared decision-making in maternity care. Academisch Proefschrift Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. Enschede: Ipskamp Drukkers; 2014.Google Scholar
  85. Nieuwenhuijze MJ, Korstjens I, Jonge A de, Vries R de, Lagro-Janssen A. On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014 Jul 9;14:223.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-223. PubMed PMID: 25008286; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4104734.
  86. Paternotte E, Dulmen S van, Lee N van der, Scherpbier AJ, Scheele F. Factors influencing intercultural doctor-patient communication: a realist review. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(4):420–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Patiëntenfederatie Nederland. Cliëntperspectief kwaliteit integrale geboortezorg. Uitkomsten achterbanraadpleging en kwaliteitscriteria t.b.v. zorgstandaard. 2014. Bron: https://www.patientenfederatie.nl/images/stories/dossier/Ziekenhuiszorg/Cli%c3%abntenperspectiefopkwaliteitIntegraleGeboortezorg2014.pdf.
  88. Pellegrino ED. Trust and distrust in professional ethics. In: Pellegrino ED, Veatch RM, Langan JP, redactie. Ethics, trust and the professions: philosophical and cultural aspects. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  89. Peters IA, Schölmerich VLN, Veen DW van, Steegers EAP, Denktaş S. Reproductive health peer education for multicultural target groups. J Multicultural Educ. 2014;8(3):162–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pieterse A, Brand P, Basoski N, Siggelbout A. Alles wat u moet weten over gedeelde besluitvorming. Een investering van arts en patiënt in betere zorg. Medisch Contact 2017;12:34–6.Google Scholar
  91. Ploem C, Voskes Y. De arts-patiëntrelatie. In: Legemaate J, Widdershoven G, redactie. Basisboek ethiek en recht in de gezondheidszorg. Amsterdam: Boom uitgevers; 2016. pag. 37–64.Google Scholar
  92. Poddar U, Brownlee S, Stacey D, Volk RJ, Williams JW, Elwyn G. Patient decision aids: a case for certification at the national level in the United States. J Clin Ethics 2015;26(4):306–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Politi MC, Street RL Jr. The importance of communication in collaborative decision making: facilitating shared mind and the management of uncertainty. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(4):579–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Read GD. Childbirth without fear. The principles and practice of natural childbirth. 3e druk. Londen: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd; 1954.Google Scholar
  95. Rijken JJ. Handreiking verantwoordelijkheid en aansprakelijkheid bij integrale geboortezorg – tweede concept. AKD 2016. Bron: https://www.kennisnetgeboortezorg.nl/?file=6163&m=1480598597&action=file.download.
  96. Rijnders M, Aalhuizen I. Samen begeleiden. TvT. 2016;01.Google Scholar
  97. Rijnders M, Kraan A van der, Aalhuizen I, Laan N van der, Groessen K, Goudsmit M, Lijster K de. CenteringPregnancy: een uitdagendere vorm van zorg! TvT. 2015;01.Google Scholar
  98. Rijnders MEB, Detmar SB, Herschderfer KC. TNO-rapport ‘Implementatie van CenteringPregnancy in Nederland 2012–2015’. TNO, CH 2016 R10627. TNO: Leiden; 2016.Google Scholar
  99. RIVM. Centraal orgaan prenatale screening. Kwaliteitseisen counselor prenatale screening. Versie 6. 2015. Bron: http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=ad3d3f25-3103-4087-9452-df219e06f95e&type=org&disposition=inline.
  100. Rosman AN, Vlemmix F, Fleuren MA, Rijnders ME, Beuckens A, Opmeer BC, Mol BW, Zwieten MC van, Kok M. Patients’ and professionals’ barriers and facilitators to external cephalic version for breech presentation at term, a qualitative analysis in the Netherlands. Midwifery 2014;30(3):324–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Salzburg Global Seminar. Salzburg statement on shared decision making. BMJ 2011 Mar 22;342:d1745.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Santen H van. Commentaar. Empathie. Medisch Contact 2017 Jun 15;24. Bron: https://www.medischcontact.nl/opinie/hoofdredactioneel/hoofdredactioneel/empathie-2.htm.
  103. Say R, Thomson R, Robson S, Exley C. A qualitative interview study exploring pregnant women’s and health professionals’ attitudes to external cephalic version. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013 Jan 16;13:4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Schölmerich VL, Ghorashi H, Denktaş S, Groenewegen P. Caught in the middle? How women deal with conflicting pregnancy-advice from health professionals and their social networks. Midwifery 2016;35:62–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Schoorel EN, Vankan E, Scheepers HC, Augustijn BC, Dirksen CD, Koning M de, Kuijk SM van, Kwee A, Melman S, Nijhuis JG, Aardenburg R, Boer K de, Hasaart TH, Mol BW, Nieuwenhuijze M, Pampus MG van, Roosmalen J van, Roumen FJ, Vries R de, Wouters MG, Weijden T van der, Hermens RP. Involving women in personalised decision-making on mode of delivery after caesarean section: the development and pilot testing of a patient decision aid. BJOG 2014;121(2):202–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Skjøth MM, Hansen HP, Draborg E, Pedersen CD, Lamont RF, Jørgensen JS. Informed choice for participation in down syndrome screening: development and content of a web-based decision aid. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Sep 21;4(3):e113.Google Scholar
  107. Smith SK, Sousa MS, Essink-Bot ML, Halliday J, Peate M, Fransen M. Socioeconomic differences in informed decisions about down syndrome screening: a systematic review and research agenda. J Health Commun. 2016;21(8):868–907.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1177145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Sørensen K, Pelikan JM, Röthlin F, Ganahl K, Slonska Z, Doyle G, Fullam J, Kondilis B, Agrafiotis D, Uiters E, Falcon M, Mensing M, Tchamov K, Broucke S van den, Brand H; HLS-EU Consortium. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur J Public Health 2015;25(6):1053–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4:CD001431.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
  110. Statius van Eps LW. Over de baringspijn. Amsterdam: Academisch proefschrift; 1954.Google Scholar
  111. Steel A, Frawley J, Adams J, Diezel H. Trained or professional doulas in the support and care of pregnant and birthing women: a critical integrative review. Health Soc Care Community 2015;23(3):225–41.  https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, Haes JC de. Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(10):1172–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Stramrood C, Slade P. A woman afraid of becoming pregnant again: posttraumatic stress disorder following childbirth. Chapter 2. In Paarlberg KM & Wiel HB van de, redactie. Biopsychosocial obstetrics and gynecology – a competency-oriented approach. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Stramrood CA, Paarlberg KM, Huis In ’t Veld EM, Berger LW, Vingerhoets AJ, Weijmar Schultz WC, Pampus MG van. Posttraumatic stress following childbirth in homelike- and hospital settings. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2011a;32:88–97.Google Scholar
  115. Stramrood CA, Wessel I, Doornbos B, Aarnoudse JG, Berg PP van den, Schultz WC, Pampus MG van. Posttraumatic stress disorder following preeclampsia and PPROM: a prospective study with 15 months follow-up. Reprod Sci. 2011b;18:645–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Struijs A, Jongsma K. Gezamenlijke besluitvorming door zorgverlener en patiënt – normatieve achtergrond. Raad voor Volksgezondheid en Zorg (RVZ). 2013. Bron: https://www.ceg.nl/uploads/publicaties/temp_file_Achtergrondstudie_Gezamenlijke_besluitvorming_zorgverlener_patient1.pdf.
  117. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New York: Penguin Putnam Inc.; 2009. ISBN10: 014311526X.Google Scholar
  118. Tijmstra TJ. Het imperatieve karakter of medische technologie en de betekenis van ‘geanticipeerde beslissingsspijt’. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1987 Jun 27;131(26):1128–31.Google Scholar
  119. Tijmstra TJ, Bajema C. ‘Je zult die ene maar zijn’; risicobeleving en keuzegedrag rond medische technologie. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990;134:1884–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Timmermans DR. Informatie is meer dan alleen het getal. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2016;160:D825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. TNO. TNO-rapport KvL/GB 2010.041. Opleidingen gezondheidsbevordering en preventie: een inventarisatie en analyse van het actuele aanbod. 2010. Bron: https://www.loketgezondleven.nl/sites/default/files/o10713_Rapport-Opleidingen-GB-en-P-071210.pdf.
  122. Tonelli MR. The challenge of evidence in clinical medicine. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(2):384–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01405.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Tucker Edmonds B. Shared decision-making and decision support: their role in obstetrics and gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;26(6):523–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Veldhuizen-Eshuis H van, Wieringa J. Advies stroomlijnen van informatie over preconceptiezorg. Rapport 225101001/2009. Bilthoven. RIVM 2012. Bron: http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=b68bf968-024e-4204-86bc-089f825eb788&type=org&disposition=inline.
  125. Verloskundig Vademecum. Eindrapport van de commissie verloskunde van het college voor zorgverzekeringen. 2003. http://www.nvog.nl/vakinformatie/Informatie/Verloskundig+Vademecum.aspx.
  126. Visser GHA, Steegers EAP. Beter baren. Medisch Contact 15 Jan 2008. Bron: https://www.medischcontact.nl/nieuws/laatste-nieuws/artikel/beter-baren.htm.
  127. Vlemmix F, Warendorf JK, Rosman AN, Kok M, Mol BW, Morris JM, Nassar N. Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: a systematic review. BJOG 2013;120(3):257–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Weijden T van der, Post H, Brand PLP, Veenendaal H van, Drenthen T, Mierlo LA van, Stalmeier P, Damman OC, Stiggelbout A. Shared decision making, a buzz-word in the Netherlands, the pace quickens towards nationwide implementation. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017;123–124:69–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wiegant E, Hageman M, Teunis T. Samen beslissen: waarom moeilijk doen als het samen kan? Koog aan de Zaan. Nederland: Poiesz Uitgevers BV; 2017. ISBN 9789491549 854.Google Scholar
  130. Wiegers TA. The quality of maternity care services as experienced by women in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009 May 9;9:18.Google Scholar
  131. Wiel HBM van de, Paarlberg KM, Dermout SM. Health advocate: an obstetrician in doubt – coping with ethical dilemmas and moral decisions. Chapter 25. In: Paarlberg KM & Wiel HB van de, redactie. Biopsychosocial obstetrics and gynecology – a competency-oriented approach. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 433–54.Google Scholar
  132. Wu P, Berg C van den, Alfirevic Z, O’Brien S, Röthlisberger M, Baker PN, Kenny LC, Kublickiene K, Duvekot JJ. Early pregnancy biomarkers in pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Sep 23;16(9):23035–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Zorgstandaard Integrale Geboortezorg versie 1.1 (2016). Bron: https://www.zorginzicht.nl/bibliotheek/integrale-geboortezorg-zorgstandaard/Paginas/Home.aspx.
  134. Zwicht BS van, Crone MR, Lith JM van, Rijnders ME. Group based prenatal care in a low-and high risk population in the Netherlands: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016 Nov 15;16(1):354. PubMed PMID: 27846824.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum is een imprint van Springer Media B.V., onderdeel van Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. I. J. Wildschut
    • 1
  • A. J. M. Waelput
    • 2
  • K. M. Paarlberg
    • 3
  • M. P. Fransen
    • 4
  • C. J. M. Groenen
    • 5
  • M. Nieuwenhuijze
    • 6
  • M. Rijnders
    • 8
  • J. C. Mooij
    • 7
  1. 1.Wildschut ConsultancyEnkhuizenNederland
  2. 2.Erasmus MC RotterdamRotterdamNederland
  3. 3.Gelre Ziekenhuizen ApeldoornApeldoornNederland
  4. 4.Afdeling Sociale geneeskundeAMC, Universiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamNederland
  5. 5.Coöperatieve Verloskundigen Nijmegen e.oNijmegenNederland
  6. 6.Verloskundige Academie Verloskunde ZuydMaastrichtNederland
  7. 7.Patiëntenfederatie NederlandUtrechtNederland
  8. 8.TNO Child Health LeidenLeidenNederland

Personalised recommendations