Advertisement

Interactive Image-Guided Surgery Using an Infrared-Based System

  • Lucia Zamorano
  • Razvan Buciuc
  • Federico C. Vinas
  • Fernando G. Diaz
Conference paper

Summary

The surgical management of intracranial tumors has always been a challenge for the neurosurgeon, from the dual perspective of acquiring a complete resection on one hand and maintaining neurological function on the other. Stereotactic technology followed by computer-assisted neuronavigation has markedly changed the outcome of these operations. It has improved the accuracy of resection, diminished the neurological complication rate, and decreased the length of hospital stay and costs. Interactive image-guided surgery has extended its applications to other fields such as epilepsy and skull-base and spine surgery, and is even used in brain trauma. From December 1991 to December 1996, we used an infrared-based system for intraoperative image-guided resections; in 1995 we began using the same system for spinal applications as well. Our patient group includes 464 patients treated for intracranial pathology and 27 for spinal lesions. In this chapter we discuss our system, protocols used for different applications, and preliminary results in patient care. From our experience with this system we conclude that the infrared-based neuro-navigator is a very useful technology that increases accuracy and the safety of surgical resection.

Key words

Computer-assisted Image-guided Infrared Interactive Resection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barnett GH, Kormos DW, Steiner CP, et al (1993) Use of a frameless, armless stereotactic wand for brain tumor localization with two-dimensional and three-dimensional neuro-imaging. Neurosurgery 33: 674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kadi AM, Zamorano L, Jiang Z, Nolte LP (1993) Intraoperative real-time localization of brain tumors. Proc Clin Applic Mod Imaging Technol 1894: 279–291Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kelly PJ (1986) Computer-assisted stereotaxis: new approach for the management of intracranial intraaxial tumors. Neurology 36: 535–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kadi AM, Zamorano L, Jiang Z (1993) Stereotactic brain surgery: instrumentation, automation, and image guidance. Proc Clin Applic Mod Imaging Technol 1894: 216–228Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kondziolka D, Lundsford LD (1995) Guided neurosurgery using the ISG Viewing Wand. Contemp Neurosurg 17 (8): 1–6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maciunas RJ, Galloway RL, Fizpatrick JM, et al (1992) A universal system for interactive image-directed neurosurgery. Stereotactic Funct Neurosurg 58: 108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maurer CR Jr, Fizpatrick JM (1993) A review of medical image registration. In: Maciunas R (ed) Interactive image-guided neurosurgery. AANS Publications, Park Ridge (IL) pp 17–44Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galloway RL Jr, Berger MS, Bass WA, et al (1993) Registered intraoperative information: electrophysiology, ultrasound and endoscopy. In: Maciunas R (ed) Interactive image-guided neurosurgery. AANS Publications, Park Ridge (IL), pp 247–258Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rohling R, Munger P, Hollerbach JM (1995) Comparison of relative accuracy between a mechanical and an optical position tracker for image-guided neurosurgery. J Image-Guided Surg 1: 30–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bucholz RD, Baumann CK (1994) The use of image-guided frameless stereotaxy during epilepsy surgery. Scientific program for the 62nd annual meeting of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, p 348Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nolte LP, Zamorano, L, Jiang Z (1995) Image-guided insertion of transpedicular screws: a laboratory setup. Spine 20: 497–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zamorano L, Nolte LP, Kadi AM (1993) Interactive intraoperative localization using an infrared-based system. Neurol Res 15: 290–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zamorano L, Nolte LP, Kadi AM (1994) Interactive intraoperative localization using an infrared-based syslem. Stereofactic Funct Neurosurg 63: 84–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zamorano L, Jiang Z, Kadi AM (1994) Computer-assisted neurosurgery system; Wayne State University hardware and software configuration. Comput Med Imaging Graphics 18: 257–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zamorano L, Nolte LP, Jiang Z (1993) Image-guided neurosurgery: frame-based and frameless approach. Neurosurg Operative Atlas 3: 403–422Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bucholz RD, Smith KR (1993) A comparison of sonic digitizers versus light emitting diode-based localization. In: Maciunas R (ed) Interactive image-guided neurosurgery. AANS Publications, Park Ridge (IL), pp 179–200Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guthrie BL, Adler JR Jr (1992) Computer-assisted preoperative planning, interactive surgery, and frameless stereotaxy. Clin Neurosurg 38: 112–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maciunas RJ, Galloway RL Jr, Latimer J (1994) The application accuracy of stereotactic frame systems. Neurosurgery (Baltim) 35: 682–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucia Zamorano
    • 1
  • Razvan Buciuc
    • 1
  • Federico C. Vinas
    • 1
  • Fernando G. Diaz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurological SurgeryWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations