Early Social Cognitive Development in Baka Infants: Joint Attention, Behavior Control, Understanding of the Self Related to Others, Social Approaching, and Language Learning

  • Tadashi Koyama
Part of the Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series book series (RNMH)


In this paper, the author presents a picture of early social development in infants growing up in a Baka hunter-gatherer community in eastern Cameroon. Interviews performed using the DESC confirmed that Baka mothers were aware of their infants’ development in social cognition. They demonstrated joint attention with their infants and provided scaffolding as they learned about objects in their environment. Infants’ ability to distinguish strangers from strangers and fear of strangers developed earlier than reported for Japanese infants. The rapid onset and stabilization of social cognition early in infancy suggests scaffolding, and mother-infant reciprocal exchanges are important in the development of communication and language.


Early social cognitive development Baka infants The significance of scaffolding Stability in early child-mother interchanges 



This study was supported by the “Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas 2010–2014, 1201.” The project leader is Takeru Akazawa, PhD. The title is Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans: Testing Evolutionary Models of learning. I am grateful to the members of our Research Team A02 in the RNMH project, “A Study of Human Learning Behavior Based on Fieldwork among Hunter-Gatherers” (team leader; Hideaki Terashima) for supporting my research. I would also like to thank Hideaki Terashima, Koji Hayashi, Izumi Hagino, and Koji Sonoda for supporting this study.


  1. Bogdan (2014) Scaffolding early acquisition in communication and language: intuitive psychology as mind designer. Forty-fourth annual meeting of the Jean Piaget Society. Plenary 2, San Francisco, 29–31 May 2014Google Scholar
  2. Bruner J (1983) Child’s talk: learning to use language. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis BL, Bedore LM (2013) An emergence approach to speech acquisition: doing and knowing. Psychology Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Hagino I, Yamauchi T (2013) Daily physical activity and time-space of Pygmy hunter-gatherers’ children in Southeast Cameroon. In: Akazawa T, Ogihara N, Tanabe H, Terashima H (eds) Dynamics of learning in Neanderthals and modern humans, vol 2, Cognitive and physical perspectives. Springer, Tokyo, pp 91–98Google Scholar
  5. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A (2010) Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466(7302):29–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaller T, Zuberbuhler K, Keller H, Slocombe KE (2014) Joint attention in wild chimpanzees and human infants: what is special about human communication? In: Invited symposium 4, Comparative perspectives on language and communicative development: joint attention, gestural communication, and nonlinguistic vocalizations in non-human primates and human infants. Forty-fourth annual meeting of the Jean Piaget Society, San Francisco, 29–31 May 2014Google Scholar
  7. Meltzoff AN, Gopnik A (2013) Learning about the mind from evidence: children’s development of intuitive theories of perception personality. In: Baron-Cohen S, Tager-Flusberg H, Lombardo ML (eds) Understanding other minds: perspectives from developmental social neuroscience. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Morinaga R, Kakinuma M, Konno M, Mauzumi M, Nakaishi Y, Igarashi K (2011) Checklist for development of early social cognition. Bunkyo-Shiryo, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  9. Murakami T, Ohgami H (2007) The development of social cognition in infancy: joint attention, language, and social emotion. Kyushu Univ Psychol Res 8:133–142 (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. Spelke ES, Kinzler KD (2007) Core knowledge. Dev Sci 10:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Terashima H (2012) A study of human learning behavior among hunter-gatherers. In: Akazawa T (ed) RNMH project series, No.001, 37–41Google Scholar
  12. Tomasello M (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Tomasello M (2009) Why we cooperate. MIT press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and SciencesKobe Gakuin UniversityKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations