Advertisement

Inclusive Systemic Design for Health System Flourishment

  • Peter PennefatherEmail author
  • Katie Seaborn
  • Deborah I. Fels
Chapter
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 8)

Abstract

Flourishment is conceptualized as an engagement experience associated with eudaimonic flourishing, a component of psychological wellbeing. Analogous to nourishment, flourishment drives a sense of being one’s authentic best self (eudaimonia) in a way that can be deliberately encouraged and registered within health systems, and their records, by design. Here, frameworks of social neuroscience, social fields, and inclusive human-centred design are elaborated into a framework synthesis for guiding systemic design of a system for registering evidence of patient experienced flourishment. Systemic design considerations are described for a registry of personal records of eudaimonic flourishment and enhanced resilience (PREFER). These are illustrated through description of patient engagement with the suggested PREFER registry elements. Their use in promoting a virtuous cycle of flourishment transactions within a system of patient-centred collaborative care for a person living with chronic pain is described.

References

  1. Barrett, L. F., & Satpute, A. B. (2013). Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: Towards an integrative functional architecture of the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(3), 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beal, D. J., Weiss, H. M., Barros, E., & MacDermid, S. M. (2005). An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1054–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borsook, D., Edwards, R., Elman, I., Becerra, L., & Levine, J. (2013). Pain and analgesia: The value of salience circuits. Progress in Neurobiology, 104, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cauda, F., Torta, D. M. E, Sacco, K., Geda, E., D’Agata, F., Costa, T., et al. (2012). Shared “core” areas between the pain and other task-related networks. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e41929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Depeltau, F. (2015). Relational sociology, pragmatism, transactions and social fields. International Review of Sociology, 25(1), 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dervin, B. (2015). Sense-making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hancock, P. A., Pepe, A. A., & Murphy, L. L. (2005). Hedonomics: The power of positive and pleasurable ergonomics. Ergonomics in Design, 13(1), 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harle, C. A., Marlow, N. M., Schmidt, S. O. F., Shuster, J. J., Listhaus, A., Fillingim, R. B., et al. (2016). The effect of EHR-integrated patient-reported outcomes on satisfaction with chronic pain care. American Journal of Managed Care, 22(12), e403–e408.Google Scholar
  11. Huber, M., Knottnerus, J. A., Green, L., van der Horst, H., Jadad, A. R., Kromhout, D., et al. (2011). How should we define health? British Medical Journal, 343, d4163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huvila, I., Cajander, Å., Daniels, M., & Åhlfeldt, R. (2015). Patients’ perceptions of their medical records from different subject positions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12), 2456–2470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ing, D. (2013). Rethinking systems thinking: Learning and coevolving with the world. System Research and Behavioural Science, 30(5), 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Irizarry, T., De Vito Dabbs, A., & Curran, C. R. (2015). Patient portals and patient engagement: A state of the science review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(6), e148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, P. H. (2014a). Systemic design principles for complex social systems. In Metcalf, G. S. (Ed). Social systems and design (Translational Systems Sciences 1) (pp. 91–128). Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, P. H. (2014b). Design research methods for systemic design: Perspectives from design education and practice. Paper presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, ISSS 2014, Retrieved from www.scopus.com
  17. Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kish, L. J., & Topol, E. J. (2015). Unpatients—why patients should own their medical data. Nature Biotechnology, 33(9), 921–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lahka, F., Pennefather, P., Ballantyne, P., Badr, H. E., Agboatwalla, M., & Mailis, A. (2015). Framework for characterizing services for the management of chronic non-cancer pain in global cities. Pain Research and Management, 20(3), 164–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mandl, K. D., Mandel, J. C., & Kohane, I. S. (2015). Driving innovation in health systems through an apps-based information economy. Cell Systems, 1(1), 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martela, F., & Steger, M. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McMahan, E. A., & Renken, M. D. (2011). Eudaimonic conceptions of well-being, meaning in life, and self-reported well-being: Initial test of a mediational model. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 589–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Newell, A. F., Gregor, P., Morgan, M., Pullin, G., & Macaulay, C. (2011). User-sensitive inclusive design. Universal Access in the Information Society, 10(3), 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nilsson, A. (2014). Personality psychology as the integrative study of traits and worldviews. New Ideas in Psychology, 32(1), 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Rämö, H. (2004). Moments of trust: Temporal and spatial factors of trust in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(8), 760–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richardson, H., & Morley, S. (2015). Action identification and meaning in life in chronic pain. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 9, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rundell, J. R. (2017). The COMPASS initiative: Implementing a complex integrated care program. General Hospital Psychiatry, 44, 67–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryff, C. D. (2013). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seaborn, K., Pennefather, P., & Fels, D. (2015). Eudaimonia in human factors research and practice: Foundations and conceptual framework. Paper presented at the ICT4AgeingWell 2015 – Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health, pp. 313–318.Google Scholar
  31. Shachak, A., & Jadad, A. R. (2010). Electronic health records in the age of social networks and global telecommunications. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303(5), 452–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Still, J. D., & Dark, V. J. (2013). Cognitively describing and designing affordances. Design Studies, 34(3), 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taha, J., Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., & Morrow, D. G. (2013). Factors affecting usage of a personal health record (PHR) to manage health. Psychology and Aging, 28(4), 1124–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thompson, E., & Stapleton, M. (2009). Making sense of sense-making: Reflections on enactive and extended mind theories. Topoi, 28(1), 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Veehof, M. M., Trompetter, H. R., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Schreurs, K. M. G. (2016). Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: A meta-analytic review. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 45(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Bede Agocha, V., et al. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Williams, A. C. D. C. (2017). Patient action as means and end of chronic pain care: Risks and routes to meaningful action. Pain, 158(8), 1403–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woodson, W. E., Tillman, B., & Tillman, P. L. (1992). Human factors design handbook (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Pennefather
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katie Seaborn
    • 2
  • Deborah I. Fels
    • 3
  1. 1.Leslie Dan Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Ted Rogers School of InformationRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations