Advertisement

Smart Links and Efficient Reconstruction for Wavelet Radiosity

  • Philipp Slusallek
  • Michael Schröder
  • Marc Stamminger
  • Hans-Peter Seidel
Conference paper
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)

Abstract

Wavelet radiosity is the unification of two important methods to solve the radiosity equation: hierarchical radiosity and Galerkin radiosity. Al-though wavelet radiosity can reap the benefits of both methods, there is still a lot of overhead and in practice several problems occur. For example, using Haar wavelets the traditional push-pull scheme leads to obviously wrong results near common patch boundaries. Moreover, interaction between partially visible patches leads to unnecessarily fine subdivisions, and higher order wavelets introduce a significant overhead for low-power links. In this article we propose a set of smart links that cope with these problems and can increase both the efficiency of the algorithm and the quality of the solution.

Additionally, we show how the expensive traditional reconstruction step that is required for piecewise constant basis functions can be avoided in the case of flatlets.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Per H. Christensen, Eric J. Stollnitz, David H. Salesin, and Tony D. DeRose. Wavelet radiance. In Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, pages 287–302, Darmstadt, Germany, June 1994.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Michael Cohen, Shenchang E. Chen, John R. Wallace, and Donald P. Greenberg. A progressive refinement approach to fast radiosity image generation. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH ’88 Proceedingsj, pages 75–84, August 1988.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Reid Gershbein. An adaptive gauss method for computing irradiance coefficients of galerkin radiosity systems. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cindy M. Goral, Kenneth E. Torrance, Donald P. Greenberg, and Bennett Battaile. Modelling the interaction of light between diffuse surfaces. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH ’84 Proceedingsj, pages 212–22, July 1984.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Steven J. Gortler, Peter Schröder, Michael F. Cohen, and Pat Hanrahan. Wavelet radiosity. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH ’93 Proceedingsj, pages 221–230, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Nicolas Holzschuch, Françoise Sillion, and George Drettakis. An efficient progressive refinement strategie for hierarchical radiosity. In Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, pages 343–357, Darmstadt, Germany, June 1994.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    James T. Kajiya. The rendering equation. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH ’86 Proceedings), pages 143–150, August 1986.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Michael Schröder. Implementierung des Hierarchical Radiosity Algorithmus im Vision System. Master’s thesis, Universität Erlangen, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Peter Schröder, Steven J. Gortler, Michael F. Cohen, and Pat Hanrahan. Wavelet projections for radiosity. In Fourth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, pages 177–184, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Peter Schröder and Pat Hanrahan. On the form factor between two polygons. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH ’93 ProceedingsJ, pages 163–164, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Marc Stamminger. Wavelet radiosity. Master’s thesis, Universität Erlangen, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Harold R. Zatz. Galerkin radiosity: A higher order solution method for global illumination. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH ’93 Proceedings), pages 213–220, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philipp Slusallek
    • 1
  • Michael Schröder
    • 1
  • Marc Stamminger
    • 1
  • Hans-Peter Seidel
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Graphics GroupUniversity of ErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations