Advertisement

New Foundations of Projective and Affine Geometry

Algebra of Geometry
  • Karl Menger
  • Franz Alt
  • Otto Schreiber
Chapter
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

Projective geometry is often called geometry of projection and section (Geometrie des Verbindens und Schneidens). In this paper foundations of projective geometry are given in terms of these two operations. We start from a single class of undefined entities, corresponding to the linear parts of a space, and two undefined operations denoted by + and ., corresponding to the join and the intersection, respectively, of these linear parts. Thus if A, B are two undefined entities, A + B corresponds to the least dimensional part of which both A and B are parts, while AB corresponds to the highest dimensional part which is part both of A and of B. In this way we obtain a far-reaching analogy with abstract algebra where, in defining a field, one also starts with a Single class of undefined elements and two undefined operations, addition and multiplication. Moreover, we obtain an analogy with the algebra of logics, in particular with the calculus of classes.1 In fact, this paper presents what might be called an algebra of elementary geometry.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. C. Abbott, The projective theory of non-euclidean geometry, Reports, Part I: 3 (1941), 13–27; Part II: 4 (1942), 22–30; Part III: 5-6 (1944), 43–52.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. M. Blumenthal and K. Menger, Studies in Geometry , Freeman, San Francisco, 1970. Chapter 5 (by Menger).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. F. DeBaggis, Hyperbolic geometry, Reports, Part I: 7 (1946), 1–14; Part II: 8 (1948), 68–80.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. P. Jenks, A set of postulates for Bolyai-Lobachevsky geometry, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 26 (1940), 277–279.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. P. Jenks, A new set of postulates for Bolyai-Lobachevsky geometry, Reports, Part I:1 (1939), 45–48; Part II: 2 (1940), 10–14; Part III: 3 (1941), 1–12.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Landin, Axiomatic theory of a Singular non-euclidean geometry, Reports 5-6 (1944), 53–59.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Menger, A new foundation of noneuclidean, affine, real projective, and euclidean geometry, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 24 (1938), 486–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Menger, Nomelle base pour le développement de la géométrie de Bolyai et Lobachevsky, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 207 (1938), 458.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Menger, Noneuclidean geometry of joining and intersecting, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 44 (1938), 821–824.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Menger, On algebra of geometry and recent progress in non-euclidean geometry, Rice Inst. Pamphlet 27 (1940), 41–79.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Menger, New projeetive definitions of the coneepts of hyperbolic geometry, Reports 7 (1946), 20–28.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Tomber, On perpendicularity in rational planes, Reports 7 (1946), 15–19.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. J. Topel, Bolyai-Lobachevsky planes with finite lines, Reports 5-6 (1944), 40–42.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Menger
  • Franz Alt
  • Otto Schreiber

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations