Advertisement

Impact of Ascending Aorta Replacement on Ventricle Load and “Windkessel” Function

  • Michael ScharfschwerdtEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The native aorta is a highly flexible vessel featuring a smart volume storage and distribution capacity, the so-called Windkessel, which contributes to a particular mode of blood distribution through the arterial system. In case of prosthetic replacement of parts of the aorta, particularly the ascending, a certain amount of the Windkessel function gets lost due to the minimal elasticity of the commonly applied vascular prostheses. This stiffening increases the load of the left ventricle and also impacts residual parts of the aorta.

Keywords

Windkessel Aorta Distensibility Prosthesis 

References

  1. 1.
    Wolinsky H, Glagov S. A lamellar unit of aortic medial structure and function in mammals. Circ Res. 1967;20:99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boudoulas H, Wooley CF. Aortic function. J Heart Valve Dis. 1996;5:258–63.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Westerhof N, Lankhaar JW, Westerhof BE. The arterial windkessel. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009;47:131–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frank O. Die grundform des arteriellen pulses. Z Biol. 1899;37:483–586.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stefanadis C, Stratos S, Vlachopoulos C, Marakas S, Boudoulas H, Kallikazaros I, Tsiamis E, Toutouzas K, Sioros L, Toutouzas P. Pressure-diameter relation of the human aorta. A new method of determination by the application of a special ultrasonic dimension catheter. Circulation. 1995;92:2210–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reymond P, Westerhof N, Stergiopulos N. Systolic hypertension mechanism: effect of global and local proximal aorta stiffening on pulse pressure. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40:742–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oishi Y, Miyoshi H, Mizuguchi Y, Iuchi A, Nagase N, Oki T. Aortic stiffness is strikingly increased with age ≥ 50 years in clinically normal individuals and preclinical patients with cardiovascular risk factors: assessment by the new technique of 2D strain echocardiography. J Cardiol. 2011;57:354–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Redheuil A, Yu WC, Mousseaux E, Harouni AA, Kachenoura N, Wu CO, et al. Age-related changes in aortic arch geometry: relationship with proximal aortic function and left ventricular mass and remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1262–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erasmi A, Sievers HH, Scharfschwerdt M, Eckel T, Misfeld M. In vitro hydrodynamics, cusp bending deformation and root distensibility for different types of aortic valve sparing operations: Remodeling, sinus prosthesis and reimplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:1044–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berdajs D, Mosbahi S, Strano F, Forro Z, Burki M, von Segesser LK. Impact of synthetic elements on aortic root haemodynamics: computed fluid dynamics of root reconstruction and valve reimplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51:432–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kolh P, d’Orio V, Lambermont B, Gerard P, Gommes C, Limet R. Increased aortic compliance maintains left ventricular performance at lower energetic cost. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:272–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morita S, Asou T, Kuboyama I, Harasawa Y, Sunagawa K, Yasui H. Inelastic vascular prosthesis for proximal aorta increases pulsatile arterial load and causes left ventricular hypertrophy in dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:768–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bauernschmitt R, Schulz S, Schwarzhaupt A, Kienke U, Vahl CF, Lange R, Hagl S. Simulation of arterial hemodynamics after partial prosthetic replacement of the aorta. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:676–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scharfschwerdt M, Sievers HH, Greggersen J, Hanke T, Misfeld M. Prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta increases wall tension in the residual aorta. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:954–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beckmann A, Funkat AK, Lewandowski J, Frie M, Ernst M, Hekmat K, et al. German heart surgery report 2015: the annual updated registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:462–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Paulis R, Centrano E, Moscarelli M, Andò G, Bertoldo F, Scaffa R, et al. Effects of ascending aorta replacement on aortic root dilatation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27:86–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kunihara T, Neumann N, Kriechbaum SD, Nomura R, Schäfers HJ. Long-term outcome of aortic root remodeling for patients with and without acute aortic dissection. Circ J. 2017;81:1824–31.  https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Detter C, Mair H, Klein HG, Georgescu C, Welz A, Reichart B. Long-term prognosis of surgically-treated aortic aneurysms and dissections in patients with and without Marfan syndrome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;13:416–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carrel T, Beyeler L, Schnyder A, Zurmühle P, Berdat P, Schmidli J, Eckstein FS. Reoperations and late adverse outcome in Marfan patients following cardiovascular surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:671–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scharfschwerdt M, Leonhard M, Lehmann J, Richardt D, Goldmann H, Sievers HH. In vitro investigation of a novel elastic vascular prosthesis for valve-sparing aortic root and ascending aorta replacement. Eur J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;49:1370–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yeh CH, Chen MC, Wu YC, Wang YC, Chu JJ, Lin PJ. Risk factors for descending aortic aneurysm formation in medium-term follow-up of patients with type A aortic dissection. Chest. 2003;124:989–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Geirsson A, Bavaria JA, Swarr D, Keane MG, Woo YJ, Szeto WY, et al. Fate of the residual distal and proximal aorta after acute type A dissection repair using a contemporary surgiccal reconstruction algorithm. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1955–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iribarne A, Keenan J, Benrashid E, Wang H, Meza JM, Ganapathi A, et al. Imaging surveillance after proximal aortic operations: is it necessary? Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:734–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Engelfriet PM, Boersma E, Tijssen JG, Bouma BJ, Mulder BJ. Beyond the root: dilatation of the distal aorta in the Marfan’s syndrome. Heart. 2006;92:1238–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Girdauskas E, Kuntze T, Borger MA, Falk V, Mohr FW. Distal aortic reinterventions after root surgery in Marfan patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1815–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schoenhoff FS, Jungi S, Czerny M, Roost E, Reineke D, Matjas G, et al. Acute aortic dissection determines the fate of initially untreated aortic segments in Marfan syndrome. Circulation. 2013;127:1567–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular SurgeryUniversity of LübeckLübeckGermany

Personalised recommendations