Advertisement

The Nature of the Malignant Choroidal Melanomata

  • Eugene Wolff
Chapter

Abstract

Writing in 1904, Parsons upheld Ribbert’s (1911) view that malignant pigmented choroidal growths were sarcomata, and is still of the same opinion. Dawson (1925) re-affirmed Unna’s (1893) suggestion that these growths were epithelial in origin and therefore carcinomata, but the great majority of authors now hold the neurogenic theory, and believe that choroidal melanomata are derived from the cells of Schwann belonging to the ciliary nerves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Collins, Treacher (1926).—Trans. Ophthal. Soc. U.K., 46, 86.Google Scholar
  2. Dawson (1925).—Edin. Med. J. 32, 501.Google Scholar
  3. Lawrence and Johnson (1915).—Choyce’s Surgery, 1, 454, London.Google Scholar
  4. Mann, Ida (1926).—Trans. Ophthal. Soc. U.K., 46, 132.Google Scholar
  5. Masson (1926).—Ann. d’Anat, Path., 3, 417; 657.Google Scholar
  6. Parsons, J. H. (1904).—Pathology of the Eye, London.Google Scholar
  7. Ribbert, H. (1911).—Lehrbuch alg. Pathologie, 4, 262.Google Scholar
  8. Smith, D T. (1925) —Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 36, 185.Google Scholar
  9. Theobald, G. D. (1937).—Arch, of Ophthal., 18, 971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Unna, P. G. (1893).—Berl. Kl. Wochenschr., 30, 14.Google Scholar
  11. Willis, R. A. (1948) — Pathology of Tumours, 828, London.Google Scholar
  12. Wolff, Eugene (1948).— Brit. J. Ophthal., 32, 72.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ——(1948).—Trans. Ophthal. Soc. U.K., 68 (in the press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1949

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene Wolff
    • 1
  1. 1.LondonUK

Personalised recommendations