Advertisement

Definitions and Limits of Triassic Stages and Substages: Suggestions Prompted by Comparisons Between North America and the Alpine-Mediterranean Region

  • E. T. Tozer
Conference paper
Part of the Schriftenreihe der Erdwissenschaftlichen Kommissionen book series (ERDWISSENSCHAFT, volume 2)

Abstract

Suggestions are made regarding the conventions that govern the scope and interpretation of Triassic stages and substages. Different interpretations of the Anisian-Ladinian and Carnian-Norian boundaries are discussed. It is suggested that a twofold rather than threefold division of the Carnian be adopted on the grounds that there seems to be insufficient evidence that the Jul (“Middle Carnian”) is younger than the Cordevol (“Lower Carnian”). Pelson, Illyr, Fassan, Longobard, Cordevol (or Jul), Tuval, Alaun and Sevat substages are more or less adequately defined and will be useful for expressing correlations provided that agreement is reached regarding the definition of their boundaries. Intervals deserving formal designation for which no names are available are Lower Anisian and Lower Norian (sensu Silbekling and Tozer, 1968). Interpretation of Rhaetian in terms of the Marshi Zone, rather than the whole of the Kössen Beds, is recommended.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arkell, W. J. (1956): Jurassic Geology of the World; Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
  2. Arkhipov, Y. V., Bytshkov, Y. M. & Polubotko, I. V. (1971): A new zonal scheme for Triassic deposits from Northeast U.S.S.R. Bull. Can. Petrol. Geol. 19 (2), 313–315.Google Scholar
  3. Arthaber, G. V. (1905): Die Alpine Trias des Mediterran-Gebietes. In Frech, F., Lethaea Geog., II (1), Trias, 224–391, 417-472.Google Scholar
  4. Assereto, R. (1969): Sul significato stratigrafico della „Zona ad Avisianus“ del Trias medio delle Alpl. Boll. Soc. Geol. It., 88, 1969, 123–145.Google Scholar
  5. — (1971): Die Binodosus-Zone. Ein Jahrhundert wissenschaftlicher Gegensätze. S. B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 178, 1–29.Google Scholar
  6. — (1972): Notes on the Anisian biostratigraphy of the Gebze Area (Kocaeli Peninsula, Turkey). Z. Deutsch. Geol. Ges. 123, 435–444.Google Scholar
  7. Bender, H. (1970): Der Nachweis von Unter-Anis („Hydasp“) auf der Insel Chios. Ann. Geol. Pays Hellen. (1), 19, (1968), 412–464.Google Scholar
  8. Callomon, J. H. (1965): Notes on Jurassic stratigraphic nomenclature. I. Principles of stratigraphic nomenclature. Carpatho-Balkan Geol. Ass. VII Congress Sofia. 1, (2), 81–85.Google Scholar
  9. Diener, C. (1921): Die Faunen der Hallstätter Kalke des Feuerkogels bei Aussee. S. B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 130, 21–33.Google Scholar
  10. — (1925): Leitfossilien der Trias. Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
  11. Harland, W. B. et al. (1972): A concise guide to Stratigraphical Nomenclature. J. Geol. Soc., 128, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hedberg, H. D. (Ed.) (1972): An International Guide to Stratigraphie Classification Terminology and Usage; Introduction and Summary; Report 7, International Subcommission on Stratigraphie Classification; Lethaia, 5 (3), 283–323.Google Scholar
  13. Kozur, H. (1972a): Probleme der Triasgliederung und Parallelisierung germanische/ tethyale Trias. Symposium Mikrofazies und Mikrofauna der Alpinen Trias und deren Nachbargebiete, Kurzfassung der Vorträge Innsbruck. 18-23.Google Scholar
  14. — (1972b): Die Conodontengattung Metapolygnathus Hayashi 1968 und ihr stratigraphischer Wert. Geol. Paläont. Mitt. Innsbruck, 2 (11), 1–37.Google Scholar
  15. — (1972c): Vorläufige Mitteilung zur Parallelisierung der germanischen und tethyalen Trias sowie einige Bemerkungen zur Stufen-und Unterstufengliederung der Trias. Mitt. Ges. Geol. Bergbaustud. Innsbruck, 21, 361–412.Google Scholar
  16. — (1973): Beiträge zur Stratigraphie und Paläontologie der Trias. Geol. Paläont. Mitt. Innsbruck, 3 (1), 1–30.Google Scholar
  17. Krystyn, L. (1973): Zur Ammoniten-und Conodonten-Stratigraphie der Hallstätter Obertrias (Salzkammergut, Österreich). Ver. Geol. B. A., 1973 (1), 113-153.Google Scholar
  18. Krystyn, L., Schäffer, G. & Schlager, W. (1968): Stratigraphie und Sedimentationsbild obertriadischer Hallstätter Kalke des Salzkammergutes. Anz. Akad. Wiss. Wien., Math.-Naturwiss. KL, 1968 (14), 329–332.Google Scholar
  19. Schäffer, G. & Schlager, W. — (1971a): Über die Fossil-Lagerstätten in den triadischen Hallstätter Kalken der Ostalpen. N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh. 137 (2), 284–304.Google Scholar
  20. Schäffer, G. & Schlager, W. — (1971b): Der Stratotypus des Nor. Ann. Inst. Geol. Pub. Hung., 54 (2), 607–629.Google Scholar
  21. Mojsisovics, E. v. (1902): Die Cephalopoden der Hallstätter Kalke (Suppl.). Abh. Geol. Reichsanst. Wien, 6 (3).Google Scholar
  22. Mojsisovics, E. v., Waagen, W. & Diener, C. (1895): Entwurf einer Gliederung der pelagischen Sedimente des Trias-Systems. S. B. Akad. Wiss. Wien Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. Abt. I, 104, 1271–1302.Google Scholar
  23. Pearson, D. A. B. (1970): Problems of Rhaetian Stratigraphy with special reference to the lower boundary of the stage. Q. Jl. Geol. Soc. Lond., 126, 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pia, J. (1930): Grundbegriffe der Stratigraphie, Leipzig, Wien.Google Scholar
  25. Rieber, H. (1967): Über die Grenze Anis-Ladin in den Südalpen. Eclogae geol. Helv., 60 (2), 611–614.Google Scholar
  26. Saks, V. N. et al. (1972): The session on Biostratigraphy of the Marine Mesozoic of Siberia and the Far East. Geol. and Geophys., Akad. Nauk. C. C. C. P., Siberian Branch, 1972 (7), 136–147. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
  27. Schindewolf, O. H. (1970): Stratigraphie und Stratotypus. Akad. Wiss. Lit. Mainz, 1970 (2), 101–232.Google Scholar
  28. Silberling, N. J. (1959): Pre-Tertiary stratigraphy and Upper Triassic paleontology of the Union District, Shoshone Mountains, Nevada. U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 322.Google Scholar
  29. Silberling, N. J. — (1962): Stratigraphie distribution of Middle Triassic Ammonites at Fossil Hill, Humboldt Range, Nevada. J. Paleontol., 36 (1), 153–160.Google Scholar
  30. Silberling, N. J. & Tozer, E. T. (1968): Biostratigraphic Classification of the Marine Triassic in North America. Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Pap. 110.Google Scholar
  31. Silberling, N. J. & Wallace, R. E. (1969): Stratigraphy of the Star Peak Group (Triassic) and overlying Lower Mesozoic Rocks, Humboldt Range, Nevada. U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 592.Google Scholar
  32. Spath, L. F. (1934): Catalogue of the fossil Cephalopoda in the British Museum (Natural History). Part IV. The Ammonoidea of the Trias. London.Google Scholar
  33. Summesberger, H. & Wagner, L. (1972): Der Stratotypus des Anis (Trias). Ann. Naturhistor. Mus. Wien, 76, 515–538.Google Scholar
  34. Tozer, E. T. (1965): Upper Triassic Ammonoid zones of the Peace River Foothills and their bearing on the classification of the Norian Stage. Can. J. Earth Sci., 2, 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. — (1967): A standard for Triassic Time. Geol. Surv. Can. Bull. 156.Google Scholar
  36. — (1971): Triassic Time and Ammonoids: Problems and Proposals. Can. J. Earth Sci., 8, 989–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. — (1972): The Earliest Marine Triassic Rocks: their Definition, Ammonoid fauna, Distribution and relationship to underlying formations. Bull. Can. Petrol. Geol., 20 (4), 643–650.Google Scholar
  38. Urlichs, M. (1972): Ostracoden aus den Kössener Schichten und ihre Abhängigkeit von der Ökologie. Mitt. Ges. Geol. Bergbaustud. Innsbruck, 21, 661–710.Google Scholar
  39. Wiedmann, J. (1970): Problems of stratigraphie classification and the definition of stratigraphie boundaries. Newsl. Strat. 1 (1), 35–48.Google Scholar
  40. — (1972): Ammoniten-Nuklei aus Schlammproben der nordalpinen Obertrias — ihre stammesgeschichtliche und stratigraphische Bedeutung. Mitt. Geol. Ges. Bergbaustud. Innsbruck, 21, 561–622.Google Scholar
  41. Zapfe, H. (1968): Fragen und Befunde von allgemeiner Bedeutung für die Biostratigraphie der alpinen Obertrias. Ver. Geol. B. A., 1967 (1/2), 13–27.Google Scholar
  42. — (1971): Die Stratotypen des Anis, Tuval und Nor und ihre Bedeutung für die Biostratigraphie und Biostratinomie der Alpinen Trias. Ann. Inst. Geol. Publ. Hung. 54, (2), 579–590.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. T. Tozer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Energy, Mines and ResourcesGeological Survey of CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations