Advertisement

EEG and Evoked Potentials: Rationale for ICU Recording and Monitoring

  • R. Q. Cracco
Chapter

Abstract

Recording or monitoring the EEG or evoked potentials (EPs) in the ICU provides useful information in acutely neurologically ill patients whenever a relationship exists between the electrical activity and the (1) functional integrity of CNS structures; (2) clinical status; (3) diagnosis or (4) prognosis. In brain death such a correlation is clearly present. In certain countries, including ViennaItaly, an EEG is required by law before a diagnosis of brain death can be made and donor organs removed. In other countries, including the United Kingdom and the United States, the diagnosis of brain death can be made on clinical grounds alone, although an EEG is often obtained to confirm this diagnosis. A clinical diagnosis of brain death requires demonstrating the absence of brain and brainstem function when depressant drug intoxication and hypothermia can be excluded. Hypothermia poses no problem since the patient can be warmed and the examination repeated. Excluding the presence of depressant drugs is more difficult. Electrocerebral inactivity or electrocerebral silence which is consistent with a clinical diagnosis of brain death is defined as no EEG activity over 2μV when recording from scalp electrode pairs 10 or more cm apart with interelectrode impedances under 10,000 ohms but over 100 ohms. The value of 2μV was selected because many EEG machines have noise levels of up to 2 μV. The EEG is often recorded with difficulty in the electrically hostile environment of the ICU. It is imperative that technicians are well trained, taught to apply electrodes with care, and identify, and, when possible, eliminate artifact.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cracco RQ, Bodis-Wollner I (1986) Evoked potentials. Alan R Liss Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiappa K (1983) Evoked potentials in clinical medicine. Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bodis-Wollner I (1982) Evoked potentials. Ann New York Acad Sci, pp 388Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hassan NF, Rossini PM, Cracco RQ, Cracco JB (1985) Unexposed motor cortex activation by low voltage stimuli. In: Morocutti C, Rizzo PA (eds) Evoked potentials: Neurophysiological and clinical aspects. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 107–113Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klass DW, Daly D (1979) Current practice of clinical electroencephalography. Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neurosurgery (Supplement on Motor Evoked Potentials). Jan 1987, Vol 20: 1Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Journal of Clinical Neurophysiol (Supplement on Guidelines). Jan 1987Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lueders H et al (1986) Subdural electrodes. In: Engel J (ed) Surgical management of the epilepsies. Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Young RR, Cracco RQ (1985) Clinical neurophysiology of conduction in central motor pathways. Ann Neurol 18: 606–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Q. Cracco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyState University of New York Health Science Center at BrooklynBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations