Advertisement

The Need for a New System of Norms for Space Law and the Danger of Conflict with the Terms of the Chicago Convention

  • M. Smirnoff
Conference paper

Abstract

In view of everything which has been said and written about space law in the United States [1], Canada [2], Europe [3] and in other parts of the world, some points are now quite clear and, in theory, there is almost unanimous accord on the essential elements of the law of space.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. C. Cooper, High Altitude Flight and National Sovereignty. Internat. Law Quart. 4, 417 (1951).Google Scholar
  2. J. C. Cooper, Legal Problems of Upper Space. Lecture before the American Society of International Law, April 25–26, 1956. Proc. Amer. Soc. Internat. Law 50, 91 (1956).Google Scholar
  3. J. C. Cooper, Roman Law and the Maxim “Cuius est solum” in International Air Law. Publication No. 1 of the Institute of International Air Law, McGill University, Montreal, 1955.Google Scholar
  4. A. G. Haley, Space Law—Basic Concepts. Tennessee Law Rev. 24, 643 (1956).Google Scholar
  5. A. G. Haley, International Cooperation in Astronautics. Foreign Service J. 35, No. 4, 42 (1958).Google Scholar
  6. A. G. Haley, Space Law and Metalaw—A Synoptic View. Harvard Univ. Law Rec. 23, No. 8 (1956).Google Scholar
  7. C. W. Jenks, International Law and Activities in Space. Internat. Comp. Law Quart. 5, 99 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. O. Schachter, Legal Aspects of Space Travel. J. Brit. Interplan. Soc. 11, 14 (1952).Google Scholar
  9. E. Weinmann and H. C. Macdougall, The Law of Space. Foreign Service J. 35 (1958), April.Google Scholar
  10. 2.
    E. Pépin, The Legal Status of the Air Space in the Light of Progress in Aviation and Astronautics. Publication No. 2 of the Institute of International Air Law, McGill University, Montreal, 1957.Google Scholar
  11. E. Pépin, Legal Problems Created by the Sputnik. Publication No. 4 of the Institute of International Air Law, McGill University, Montreal, 1958.Google Scholar
  12. 3.
    W. Mandl, Der Weltraum. Ein Problem der Raumfahrt Mannheim-BerlinLeipzig: Bensheimer, 1932.Google Scholar
  13. A. Meyer, Rechtliche Probleme des Weltraumflugs (Legal Problems of Flight into the Outer Space). Z. Luftrecht 2, 37 (1953).Google Scholar
  14. Meyer, Der künstliche Erdsatellit als Rechtsproblem. Neue Zürcher Ztg., October 22, 1957.Google Scholar
  15. Meyer, Anmerkungen zu dem Vortrag, gehalten von J. C. COOPER am 26. April 1956 über die rechtlichen Probleme des Weltraums. Z. Luftrecht 5, 171 (1956).Google Scholar
  16. Welf Heinrich Prince Of Hanover, Luftrecht und Weltraum (Air Law and Space), p. 72. Doctor Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Law and Political Science at the George August University of Göttingen, 1953.Google Scholar
  17. Cheng, Bin, International Law and High Altitude Flights: Balloons, Rockets and Man-Made Satellites. Internat. Comp. Law Quart. 3, 487 (1957).Google Scholar
  18. K. H. Böhme, Lufthoheit und Weltraumflug. Z. Luftrecht 5, 184 (1956).Google Scholar
  19. D. Goedhuis, The Limitation of Air Sovereignty. Conference of the International Law Association, Dubrovnik 1956.Google Scholar
  20. Joeden, Äthersouveränität oder Ätherfreiheit. Jb. Internat. Recht 3, 85 (1954).Google Scholar
  21. J. Kroell, Einem Weltraumrecht entgegen. Z. Luftrecht 1, 254 (1952).Google Scholar
  22. Min-Ming-Peng, Le vol it haute altitude et l’article 1-er de la Convention de Chicago. Rev. Franç. Droit Aérien 6, 390 (1952).Google Scholar
  23. W. Guldimann, Cuius est solum, eius est usque ad coelum. Z. Luftrecht 1, 213 (1952).Google Scholar
  24. 4.
    A. Meyer, op. cit. in Z. Luftrecht 5, 182 (1956).Google Scholar
  25. 5.
    J. C. Cooper, in the above mentioned lecture before the American Society of International Law, April 25–26, 1956, and A. Meyer, op. cit. p. 180, and others.Google Scholar
  26. 6.
    D.Goedhuis, op. cit.Google Scholar
  27. 7.
    See the different views about the problem of sovereignty in BÖhme, op. cit., and by Meyer and Cooper.Google Scholar
  28. 8.
    The system of three zones which was proposed by Professor Cooper for the outer space is only a continuation of the system of zones which Fauchille introduced in the early years of the 20th century for air space. P. Fauchille, Le domaine aérien et le régime juridique des aérostats. Paris: Dalloz, 1901.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1959

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Smirnoff
    • 1
  1. 1.BelgradeYugoslavia

Personalised recommendations