Advertisement

“Functional age” and physical work capacity during day and night

  • O. Östberg
  • G. Svensson
Chapter
Part of the Forschungsberichte Des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen book series (FOLANW)

Abstract

Borg and Linderholm (1967) showed that the body’s response to physical work is dependent on age, as is the subjective perception of the work load. They asked their subjects to rate the perceived exertion (the RPE measure) during submaximal work on a cycle ergometer simultaneously monitored heart rate (the HR measure). Significant age differences were found, in that the older subjects had a lower HR and a higher RPE than the younger subjects (fig.l). In a study of interindividual differences in circadian fatigue patterns of shift workers, Östberg (1973) made use of Borg and Linderholm’s technique, and found that a subject’s change in HR/RPE pattern from day to night was similar to what would have been observed had first a young and then an old subject been tested in the day. Changed HR/RPE pattern could thus tentatively be evaluated in terms of changed “functional age” for the same subject. Employing this hypothesis it was found that ‘morning’ types of subjects were ‘young’ in the mornings and ‘old’ in the evenings, and vice versa for ‘evening’ types of subjects (‘morning’ and ‘evening’ types being defined by their scores on a simple questionnaire on circadian phase).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Åstrand, I. Aerobic work capacity in men and women with special reference to age. Acta physiol. scand. 48, suppl. 169 (1960)Google Scholar
  2. Åstrand, P.-O. and Ryhming, I. A nomogram for calculation of aerobic capacity (physical fit ness). J. Appl. Physiol. 7, 218–221 (1954)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Borg, G. Interindividual scaling and perception of muscular force. Kungliga fysiografiska Sällskapets i Lund Förhandlingar 12 117–125 (1961)Google Scholar
  4. Borg, G. and Linderholm, H. Perceived exertion and pulse rate during graded exercise in various age groups. Acta Med. Scand. 54, suppl. 472 (1967)Google Scholar
  5. Crockford, G.W. and Davies, C.T.M. Circadian variation in response to submaximal exercise on a bicycle ergometer. J. Physiol. 201, 94–95 (1969)Google Scholar
  6. Dirken, J.M. (Ed.) Functional age of industrial workers. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen 1972Google Scholar
  7. Donoso, H., Apud, E. and Lundgren, N.P.V. Direct estimation of circulatory fatigue using a bicycle ergo meter. Ergonomics 14, 53–60 (1971)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, R.H.T., Melcher, A., Hesser, C.M., Wigertz, O. and Ekelund, L.-G. Physiological correlates of perceived exertion in continuous and intermittent exercise with the same average power output. Europ. J. Clin. Invest. 2, 108–114 (1972)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein, K.E., Wegmann, H.M. and Brüner, R. Circadian rhythm in indices of human performance, physical fitness and stress resistance. Aerospace Med. 39, 512–518 (1968)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. östberg, O. Interindividual differences in circadian fatigue patterns of shift workers. Brit. J. industr. Med. 30, 341–351 (1973)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Östberg, O. and Appel, C.-P. Shift work in a medium heavy industry (GGAB). To be publishedGoogle Scholar
  12. Voigt, E.-D., Engel, P. und Klein, H. Über den Tagesgang der körperlichen Leistungsfähigkeit. Int. Z. angew. Physiol. 25, 1–12 (1968)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wahlberg, I. and Åstrand, I. Physical work capacity during the day and at night. Work-Environment-Health 10, 65–68 (1973)Google Scholar
  14. Wojtczak-Jaroszowa, J. Changes in manual performance and physical fitness in day and night. Studia Laboris et Salutis No. 11, 107–113 (1972)Google Scholar
  15. Wojtczak-Jaroszowa, J. and Banaszkiewicz, A. Physical work capacity during the day and at night. Ergonomics 17, 193–198 (1974)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yoder, T.A. and Botzum, G.D. The long-day short-week in shift work: a human factors study. Proc. of the Human Factors Society Conference in New York, September 1971Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Östberg
  • G. Svensson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations