Advertisement

Polarisation des Lichtes

  • Gerhard Schmidt

Zusammenfassung

Wir haben bisher zwei Eigenschaften kennen gelernt, durch welche sich Strahlen voneinander unterscheiden können, nämlich 1. die Schwingungsenergie, welche dem Quadrate der Amplitude proportional ist und für die sichtbaren Strahlen die sogenannte Lichtstärke bestimmt, und 2. die Schwingungsdauer (Periode), von welcher die Wellenlänge und Brechbarkeit, sowie für die sichtbaren Strahlen — die Farbe derselben abhängt.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

Zu § 1

  1. Fresnel: Oeuvres 1, 441–799; Ann. chim. et phys. (2) 46, 225, 1831.Google Scholar
  2. Fresnel: Pogg. Ann. 22, 90, 1831.Google Scholar
  3. F. Neumann: Pogg. Ann. 25, 456, 1832.Google Scholar

Zu § 2

  1. Brewster: Phil. Trans. 1815, p. 125.Google Scholar
  2. J. Kanonnikow: Journ. d. russ. phys.-chem. Ges. 30, 374, 1898.Google Scholar
  3. J. Kanonnikow: Chem Centralbl. 2, 697, 1898.Google Scholar
  4. Haidinger: Pogg-. Ami. 63, 29, 1844.Google Scholar
  5. Haidinger: Pogg-. Ami. 67, 435, 1846.Google Scholar
  6. Haidinger: Pogg-. Ami. 68, 73, 1846.Google Scholar
  7. Haidinger: Pogg-. Ami. 85, 350, 1852.Google Scholar
  8. Haidinger: Pogg-. Ami. 91, 591, 1854.Google Scholar
  9. Haidinger: Pogg-. Ami. 96, 314, 1855.Google Scholar
  10. Helmholtz: Physiologische Optik, 2. Auflage, S. 570, 1896.Google Scholar
  11. Jamin: Compt. rend. 26, 197, 1848.Google Scholar
  12. Jamin: Pogg. Ann. 74, 145, 1848.Google Scholar
  13. Malus: Bull, de la Soc. Philom. 1, Nr. 16; Mém. d’Arcueil 1, 113, 1808.Google Scholar
  14. Nörrenbergs. Bertin: Ann. chim. et phys. (3) 69, 87, 1863.Google Scholar
  15. Biot: Traité de physique 4, 355.Google Scholar
  16. Pfund: Astrophys. Journ. 24, 19, 1906.ADSGoogle Scholar

Zu § 3

  1. Arago: Oeuvres 1, 150, 185, 217, 468; Compt. rend. 30, 365, 405, 1850.Google Scholar

Zu § 4

  1. Fresnel et Arago: Ann. chim. et phys. (2) 10, 288, 1819.Google Scholar
  2. Fresnel: Oeuvres 1, 507; 2, 493.Google Scholar
  3. Verdet: Compt. rend. 32, 46, 1850.Google Scholar

Zu § 5

  1. Fresnel: Oeuvres 1, 441–799.Google Scholar
  2. Lafay: Journ. de phys. (3) 8, 96, 1899.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Newton: Optice, lib. II, observ. 1, 2.Google Scholar
  4. Stokes: Phil. Trans. (5) 8, 1848.Google Scholar
  5. Quincke: Pogg. Ann. 127, 1, 199, 1866.Google Scholar
  6. Quincke: Pogg. Ann. 128, 355, 1866.Google Scholar
  7. Jamin: Ann. chim. et phys. (3) 30. Google Scholar
  8. Hall: Phys. Rev. 15, 65, 1902.ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. F. Neumann: vgl. § 1.Google Scholar
  10. MacCullagh: Trans. Irish Acad. 18, I, 31, 1837.Google Scholar
  11. Dove: Pogg. Ann. 71, 115, 1847.Google Scholar
  12. v. Schaefer und Gross: Ann. d. Phys. 32, 648, 1910.zbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Voigt: Ann. d. Phys.. 34, 797, 1911.ADSGoogle Scholar

Zu § 6

  1. I. Arago: Oeuvres compl. 7, 403, 1858.Google Scholar
  2. I. Arago: Ann. chim. et phys. (2) 27, 89, 1824.Google Scholar
  3. De la Provostaye et Desains: Ann. chim. et phys. (3) 28, 252, 1850.Google Scholar
  4. De la Provostaye et Desains: Ann. chim. et phys. (3) 32, 112, 1851.Google Scholar
  5. Kirchhoff: Pogg. Ann. 109, 275, 1860.Google Scholar
  6. Magnus: Pogg. Ann. 127, 600, 1866.Google Scholar
  7. Magnus: Pogg. Ann. 128, 161, 1866.Google Scholar
  8. Magnus: Pogg. Ann. 134, 45, 1868.Google Scholar
  9. Möller: Wied. Ann. 24, 266, 1885.Google Scholar
  10. Violle: Compt. rend. 105, 111, 1887.Google Scholar
  11. Kolaček: Wied. Ann. 39, 236, 1890.Google Scholar
  12. Kolaček: Wied. Ann. 64, 398, 1898.Google Scholar
  13. W. Uljanin: „Das Lambertsche Gesetz und die Polarisation Aragos“ (russ.). Kasan 1899; Wied. Ann. 62, 637, 1897; Verh. d. D. Phys. Ges. 14, 40, 1895.Google Scholar
  14. Millikan: Phys. Rev. 3, 81, 177, 1895.ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. II. De la Provostaye et Desains: Ann. chim. et phys. (3) 34, 1852.Google Scholar
  16. Lafay: Ann. chim. et phys. (7) 16, 503, 1899.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Wright: Drud. Ann. 1, 17, 1900.Google Scholar
  18. III. Tyndall: Proc. Roy. Soc. 17, 92, 222, 317, 1868.Google Scholar
  19. Soret: Arch. Sc. phys. 20, 429, 1888.Google Scholar
  20. Soret: Arch. Sc. phys. 20, 429, 1888.Google Scholar
  21. Soret: Ann. chim. et phys. (6) 14, 1888; Compt. rend. 107, 867, 1888.Google Scholar
  22. Lallemand: Ann. chim. et phys. (4) 17, 200, 1871.Google Scholar
  23. Pernter: Denkschr. d. math.-naturw. Kl. d. Wien. Akad. 1901, S. 73.Google Scholar
  24. Rayleigh: Phil. Mag. (5) 47, 375, 1899.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Kober: Pogg. Ann. 144, 395, 1871.Google Scholar
  26. Mecklenburg: Kolloid-Ztschr. 14, 172, 1914.Google Scholar
  27. Mecklenburg: Kolloid-Ztschr. 15, 149, 1914.Google Scholar
  28. v. Hauer: Ann. d. Phys. 57, 145, 1918.ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. E. Müller: Ann. d. Phys. 24, 1, 1907.Google Scholar
  30. Ehrenhaft: Ann. d. Phys. 11, 489, 1903.ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. Mie: Ann. d. Phys. 25, 377, 1908.zbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  32. Mie: Verh. d. D. Phys. Ges. 9, 492, 1907.Google Scholar
  33. Mie: Phys. Ztschr. 8, 769, 1907.Google Scholar
  34. Gans: Ann. d. Phys. 29, 277, 1909.zbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  35. Gans: Ann. d. Phys. 37, 881, 1912.zbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  36. Gans: Ann. d. Phys. 47, 270, 1915.ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. Gans: Ann. d. Phys. 62, 331, 1920.ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. Gans und Calatroni: Ann. d. Phys. 61, 465, 1920.ADSGoogle Scholar
  39. Steubing: Ann. d. Phys. 26, 329, 1908.ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. Isnardi: Ann. d. Phys. 62, 573, 1920.ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. Senftleben und Benedict: Ann. d. Phys. 60, 297, 1919.ADSGoogle Scholar
  42. Senftleben und Benedict: Verh. d. D. Phys. Ges. 7, 8, 1919.Google Scholar
  43. Senftleben und Benedict: Phys. Ztschr. 20, 282, 1919.Google Scholar
  44. Talbot: Phil. Mag. 30, 459, 1918.Google Scholar
  45. Schirman: Ann. d. Phys. 59, 493, 1919.ADSGoogle Scholar
  46. Pihlblad: Diss., Upsala 1918; Beibl. 43, 109, 1919.Google Scholar
  47. Strutt: Proc. Roy. Soc. 95, 476, 1919.ADSGoogle Scholar
  48. Strutt: IV. Arago: Oeuvres compl. 7, 431, 1813.Google Scholar
  49. Stokes: Trans. Cambr. phil. Soc. 9, 1, 1849.ADSGoogle Scholar
  50. Stokes: Phil. Mag. (4) 13, 158, 1857.Google Scholar
  51. Stokes: Pogg. Ann. 101, 154, 1857.Google Scholar
  52. Holtzmann: Pogg. Ann. 89, 446, 1856.Google Scholar
  53. Eisenlohr: Pogg. Ann. 104, 337, 1858.Google Scholar
  54. Lommel: Grun. Arch. 38, 209, 1862.Google Scholar
  55. Fröhlich: Wied. Ann. 3, 376, 568, 1878.Google Scholar
  56. Fröhlich: Wied. Ann. 4, 319, 1878.Google Scholar
  57. Fröhlich: Wied. Ann. 5, 134, 1878zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. Fröhlich: Wied. Ann. 5, 134, 1878; 6, 8, 13, 15, 22, 1879–1884.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. Ditscheiner: Wien. Ber. 67, 205, 1873.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. K. Exner: Wien. Ber. 101, 8, 1892.Google Scholar
  61. Du Bois: Wied. Ann. 46, 5, 42, 1892.Google Scholar
  62. Du Bois: Wied. Ann. 48, 546, 1893.Google Scholar
  63. Poincaré: Acta Math. 16, 297, 1892.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  64. Poincaré: Acta Math. 20, 313, 1897.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  65. Lamb: Proe. Lond. math. Soc. 29, 523, 1898.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  66. Carslow: Proc. Lond. math. Soc. 30, 121, 1899.Google Scholar
  67. Kayleigh: Proc. Koy. Soc. 79, 532, 1907.Google Scholar
  68. Voigt: Gott. Nachr. 1911.Google Scholar
  69. Pogâny: Ann. d. Phys. 37, 257, 1912.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  70. Quincke: Pogg. Ann. 149, 273, 1873.Google Scholar
  71. Ambronn: Wied. Ann. 48, 716, 1893.Google Scholar
  72. Du Bois und Kubens: Wied. Ann. 49, 593, 1893.Google Scholar
  73. Du Bois und Kubens: Ann. d. Phys. 35, 243, 1911.Google Scholar
  74. Th. Meyer: Verh. d. D. Phys. Ges. 16, 126, 1914.Google Scholar
  75. Braun: Wied. Ann. 49, 593, 1893.Google Scholar
  76. Braun: Verh. d. D. Phys. Ges. 6, 77, 1904.Google Scholar

Zu § 7

  1. Malus: Mém. de l’Acad. des Sc. 11.Google Scholar
  2. Babinet: Compt. rend. 8, 709, 1838.Google Scholar
  3. Glan: Pogg. Ann. 155, 1, 258, 1875.Google Scholar
  4. Glan: Pogg. Ann. 156, 235, 1875.Google Scholar
  5. Glan: Wied. Ann. 7, 321, 640, 1879.Google Scholar
  6. Glan: Wied. Ann. 47, 253, 1892.Google Scholar
  7. Wernicke: Pogg. Ann. 159, 198, 1876.Google Scholar
  8. Wernicke: Wied. Ann. 25, 203, 1885.Google Scholar
  9. Wernicke: Wied. Ann. 30, 452, 1885.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Hennig: Gott. Nachr. 1887, S. 366.Google Scholar
  11. Drude: Wied. Ann. 36, 532, 865, 1889.Google Scholar
  12. Drude: Wied. Ann. 39, 481, 1890.Google Scholar
  13. Drude: Wied. Ann. 42, 186, 1891.Google Scholar
  14. Drude: Wied. Ann. 50, 595, 1893.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Drude: Wied. Ann. 51, 77, 1894.Google Scholar
  16. Drude: Wied. Ann. 64, 159, 1898.Google Scholar
  17. Kath: Wied. Ann. 62, 328, 1897.Google Scholar
  18. Jamin: Compt. rend. 21, 430, 1845.Google Scholar
  19. Jamin: Compt. rend. 22, 477, 1846.Google Scholar
  20. Jamin: Compt. rend. 23, 1103, 1846.Google Scholar
  21. Jamin: Compt. rend. 24, 714, 1847.Google Scholar
  22. Jamin: Compt. rend. 26, 83, 383, 1848.Google Scholar
  23. Jamin: Compt. rend. 27, 147, 1848.Google Scholar
  24. Jamin: Ann. chim. et phys. (3), 19, 296, 1847.Google Scholar
  25. Jamin: Ann. chim. et phys. (3), 22, 311, 1848.Google Scholar
  26. Jamin: Pogg. Ann. Ergbd. 2, 437, 1848.Google Scholar
  27. Jamin: Ergbd. 74, 528, 1848.Google Scholar
  28. Seebeck: P.ogg. Ann. 20, 35, 1830.Google Scholar
  29. Airy: Phil. Mag. (3) 1, 25, 1833.Google Scholar

Zu § 8

  1. Arago: Oeuvres 4, 435; Ann. chim. et phys. (2) 4, 95, 99, 1817.Google Scholar
  2. Babinet: Compt. rend. 11, 618, 1840.Google Scholar
  3. Babinet: Compt. rend. 15, 43, 1842.Google Scholar
  4. Babinet: Compt. rend. 20, 801, 1845.Google Scholar
  5. Babinet: Compt. rend. 23, 195, 233, 1846.Google Scholar
  6. Klöden: De luce aëre polarisata. Diss. Berlin 1837.Google Scholar
  7. Brewster: Compt. rend. 20, 803, 1845.Google Scholar
  8. Brewster: Compt. rend. 30, 533, 1850.Google Scholar
  9. Brewster: Trans, of Edinb. 23, 213, 1865.Google Scholar
  10. Bernard: Compt rend. 37, 795, 1854.Google Scholar
  11. H. Becquerel: Ann. chim. et phys. (5) 19, 90, 1880.Google Scholar
  12. H. Becquerel: Compt. rend. 108, 997, 1889.Google Scholar
  13. F. Busch: Atmosphärische Polarisation. Ber. d. Gymn. zu Arnsberg 1890; Met. Ztschr. 3, 532, 1886; 1889, 81; 1890, 67; 1896, 158; 1903 317; 1905, 248.Google Scholar
  14. Piltschikow (Piltschikoff): Compt. rend. 114, 468, 1892.Google Scholar
  15. Piltschikow (Piltschikoff): Compt. rend. 115, 555, 1892.Google Scholar
  16. Soret: Compt. rend. 107, 621, 867, 1888.Google Scholar
  17. Soret: Ann. chim. et phys (6) 14, 503, 1888.Google Scholar
  18. Sack: Met. Ztschr. 141, 472, 1905.Google Scholar
  19. Sack: Met. Ztschr. 142, 1449, 1906.Google Scholar
  20. Cornu: Ann. chim. et phys. (6) 21, 203, 1890.Google Scholar
  21. Wheatstone: Brit. Ass. Rep. 2, 10, 1848.Google Scholar
  22. Hurion: Ann. chim. et phys. (7) 7, 456, 1896.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. MacConnel: Nature 37, 177, 1887.ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. MacConnel: Phil. Mag. 27, 81, 1889.Google Scholar
  25. Jensen: Beiträge zur Photometrie des Himmels. Diss., Kiel 1898.Google Scholar
  26. Jensen: Met. Ztschr. 36, 545, 1901.Google Scholar
  27. Pernter: vgl. § 6.Google Scholar
  28. Spring: Arch. Sc. phys. (4) 7, 225, 1899.Google Scholar
  29. Crova: Ann. chim. et phys. (6) 21, 203, 1890.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 1922

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerhard Schmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität Münster i. W.Deutschland

Personalised recommendations