Advertisement

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: How It Looks Today

  • Nuno Gomes
  • Mikel Aramberri
  • Helder Fonte
Chapter
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Several treatment approaches for shoulder instability are possible, from conservative to surgical. Still, many surgical techniques have been described to address this condition, each with different indications according to the pathological findings, patient’s age, activity level and expectations. Besides the capsulolabral detachment from the glenoid, a plastic deformation of the capsule also occurs every time a shoulder dislocates, particularly at the first event, with variable degrees of bony lesions. It is this variability in the type and extent of the imaging and arthroscopic findings, along with the natural clinical history of each unstable shoulder, that make it of utmost importance to precisely define the instability pattern in order to select the most appropriate treatment. We present an overview of the current indications for the capsulolabral repair and the latest techniques and hardware available for that purpose.

Keywords

Shoulder instability Bankart repair Shoulder arthroscopy 

References

  1. 1.
    Boileau P, Villalba M, Héry JY, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(8):1755–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grana WA, Buckley PD, Yates CK. Arthroscopic Bankart suture repair. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:348–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Green MR, Christensen KP. Arthroscopic Bankart repair: two to five year follow-up with clinical correlation to severity of glenoid labral lesion. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:276–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bacilla P, Field LD, Savoie FH. Arthroscopic Bankart repair in a high demand patient population. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:51–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, Hammerman SM. Arthroscopic treatment of anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82:991–1003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cole BJ, L’Insalata J, Irrgang J, Warner JJP. Comparison of arthroscopic and open anterior shoulder stabilization. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82:1108–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sperber A, Hamberg P, Karlsson J, et al. Comparison of an arthroscopic and an open procedure for posttraumatic instability of the shoulder: a prospective randomized multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:105–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Provencher MT. Editorial commentary: is it time to take a stand? When arthroscopic Bankart repair is no longer a viable option for anterior shoulder instability. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(9):2537–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fabbriciani C, Milano G, Demontis A, Fadda S, Ziranu F, Mulas PD. Arthroscopic versus open treatment of Bankart lesion of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:456–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harris JD, Gupta AK, Mall NA, et al. Long-term outcomes after Bankart shoulder stabilization. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(5):920–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Castagna A, Conti M, Moushine E, Delle Rose G, Massazza G, Garofalo R. A new technique to improve tissue grip and contact force in arthroscopic capsulolabral repair: the MIBA stitch. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:415–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mologne TF, McBride MT, Lapoint JM. Assessment of failed arthroscopic anterior labral repairs: findings at open surgery. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:813–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tauber M, Resch H, Forstner R, Raffl M, Schauer J. Reasons for failure after surgical repair of anterior instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(3):279–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arce G, Arcuri F, Ferro D, Pereira E. Is selective arthroscopic revision beneficial for treating recurrent anterior shoulder instability? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;479(4):965–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bartl C, Schumann K, Paul J, Vogt S, Imhoff AB. Arthroscopic capsulolabral revision repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:511–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mologne TS, Provencher MT, Menzel KA, et al. Arthroscopic stabilization in patients with an inverted pear glenoid: results in patients with bone loss of the anterior glenoid. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(8):1276–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Provencher MT, Arciero RA, Burkhart SS, Levine WN, Ritting AW, Romeo AA. Key factors in primary and revision surgery for shoulder instability. Instr Course Lect. 2010;59:227–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill–Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:677–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamamoto N, Itoi E, Abe H, et al. Contact between the glenoid and the humeral head in abduction, external rotation, and horizontal extension: a new concept of glenoid track. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(5):649–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Imhoff AB, Ansah P, Tischer T, et al. Arthroscopic repair of anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability using a portal at the 5:30 o’clock position: analysis of the effects of age, fixation method, and concomitant shoulder injury on surgical outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(9):1795–803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lim TK, Koh KH, Lee SH, Shon MS, Bae TS, Park WH, Yoo JC. Inferior anchor cortical perforation with arthroscopic bankart repair: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(1):31–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lafosse L, Baier GP, Jost B. Footprint fixation for arthroscopic reconstruction in anterior shoulder instability: the Cassiopeia double-row technique. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(2):231.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iwaso H, Uchiyama E, Sakakibara S, Fukui N. Modified double-row technique for arthroscopic Bankart repair: surgical technique and preliminary results. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77(2):252–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wade R, Reddy PVB. Functional outcome of arthroscopic double row repair for Bankart lesion. J Orthop. 2018;15(3):792–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.021. eCollection 2018 SepCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McDonald LS, Thompson M, Altchek DW, McGarry MH, Lee TQ, Rocchi VJ, Dines JS. Doublerow capsulolabral repair increases load to failure and decreases excessive motion. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(11):2218–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.025. Epub 2016 May 18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Park JY, Chung SW, Lee JS, Oh KS, Lee JH. Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes of vertical simple stitch versus modified Mason-Allen Stitch in arthroscopic Bankart repairs: a prospective randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(2):398–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Witney-Lagen C, Perera N, Rubin S, Venkateswaran B. Fewer anchors achieves successful arthroscopic shoulder stabilization surgery: 114 patients with 4 years of follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(3):382–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Judson CH, Voss A, Obopilwe E, Dyrna F, Arciero RA, Shea KP. An anatomic and biomechanical comparison of Bankart repair configurations. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(13):3004–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boddula MR, Adamson GJ, Gupta A, McGarry MH, Lee TQ. Restoration of labral anatomy and biomechanics after superior labral anterior-posterior repair - comparison of mattress versus simple technique. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(4):875–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stein T, Mehling AP, Reck C, Buckup J, Efe T, Hoffmann R, Jaeger A, Welsch F. MRI assessment of the structural labrum integrity after Bankart repair using knotless bio-anchors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1771–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Papalia R, Franceschi F, Diaz Balzani L, D’Adamio S, Denaro V, Maffulli N. The arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability: bioabsorbable and standard metallic anchors produce equivalent clinical results. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(9):1173–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Silver MD, Daigneault JP. Symptomatic interarticular migration of glenoid suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(1):102–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ozbaydar M, Elhassan B, Warner JJ. The use of anchors in shoulder surgery: a shift from metallic to bioabsorbable anchors. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(10):1124–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cobaleda AF, Sanders EJ, Barber FA. Adverse events associated with biodegradable lactide-containing suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(5):555–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barber FA, Herbert MA, Hapa O, Rapley JH, Barber CA, Bynum JA, Hrnack SA. Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(7):895–905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Barber FA, Herbert MA. Cyclic loading biomechanical analysis of the pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2013 update. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(5):832–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Erickson J, Chiarappa F, Haskel J, Rice J, Hyatt A, Monica J, Dhawan A. Biomechanical comparison of a first- and a second-generation all-soft sutureglenoid anchor. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(7):2325967117717010.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117717010. eCollection 2017 JulCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pfeiffer FM, Smith MJ, Cook JL, Kuroki K. The histologic and biomechanical response of two commercially available small glenoid anchors for use in labral repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(8):1156–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Willemot L, Elfadalli R, Jaspars KC, Mark H, Ahw MH, Peeters J, Jansen N, Declerq G, Verborgt O. Radiological and clinical outcome of arthroscopic labral repair with all-suture anchors. Acta Orthop Belg. 2016;82:174–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ruder JA, Dickinson EY, Peindl RD, Habet NA, Fleischli JE. Cyclic and load-to-failure properties of all-suture anchors in human cadaveric shoulder glenoid bone. Arthroscopy. 2019. pii: S0749-8063(19)30061-1.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ruder JA, Dickinson EY, Habet N, Peindl RD, D’Alessandro DF, Fleischli JE. Slight reduction in the insertion depth for an all-suture anchor decreases cyclic displacement in the shoulder glenoid. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(5):1384–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ng DZ, Kumar VP. Arthroscopic Bankart repair using knot-tying versus knotless suture anchors: is there a difference? Arthroscopy. 2014;30(4):422–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Martinez A, Han Y, Sardar ZM, Beckman L, Steffen T, Miller BS, Martineau PA. Risk of glove perforation with arthroscopic knot tying using different surgical gloves and high-tensile strength sutures. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(9):1552–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kocaoglu B, Guven O, Nalbantoglu U, Aydin N, Haklar U. No difference between knotless sutures and suture anchors in arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesions in collision athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(7):844–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cho NS, Lubis AM, Ha JH, Rhee YG. Clinical results of arthroscopic Bankart repair with knot-tying and knotless suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(12):1276–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Balg F, Boileau P. The instability severity index score. A simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(11):1470–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rouleau DM, Hebert-Davies J, Djahangiri A, Godbout V, Pelet S, Balg F. Validation of the instability shoulder index score in a multicenter reliability study in 114 consecutive cases. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(2):278–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ruiz Ibán MA, Asenjo Gismero CV, Moros Marco S, Ruiz Díaz R, Del Olmo Hernández T, Del Monte Bello G, García Navlet M, Ávila Lafuente JL, Díaz Heredia J. Instability severity index score values below 7 do not predict recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(12):3905–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05471-w.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lazarides AL, Duchman KR, Ledbetter L, Riboh JC, Garrigues GE. Arthroscopic remplissage for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review of clinical and biomechanical studies. Arthroscopy. 2019;35:617–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Di Giacomo G, Itoi E, Burkhart SS. Evolving concept of bipolar bone loss and the Hill-Sachs lesion: from “engaging/ non-engaging” lesion to “on-track/off-track” lesion. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:90–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cuéllar A, Cuéllar R, de Heredia PB. Arthroscopic revision surgery for failure of open latarjet technique. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(5):910–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ESSKA 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nuno Gomes
    • 1
  • Mikel Aramberri
    • 2
  • Helder Fonte
    • 3
  1. 1.Hospital das Forças Armadas and Hospital da LuzPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Alai Sport Medicine ClinicMadridSpain
  3. 3.Hospital das Forças Armadas and Centro Hospitalar do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations