Advertisement

Promoting Objective and Subjective Safety for Cyclists in Metropolitan Areas

  • Jan SilbererEmail author
  • Thunyathep Santhanavanich
  • Patrick Müller
  • Thomas Bäumer
Chapter
  • 32 Downloads

Introduction

The number of bicycle accidents is currently rising and is considered a major political challenge (Polizeipräsidium Stuttgart 2019; Wundersee 2019). In 2018, there was an increase of 50 deadly cycling accidents compared to 2017 (Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur 2019). The fact that cycling is considered a major political challenge can be seen in how Vision Zero has been embedded within the coalition agreement of the German federal government, which stipulates the medium‐term reduction of the number of fatalities to zero using measures such as increasing the number of cycle paths (Ein neuer Aufbruch für Europa, Eine neue Dynamik für Deutschland, Ein neuer Zusammenhalt für unser Land 2018). Indicators on the number and risk of accidents are defined as objective safety (Sørensen and Mosslemi 2009). In order to promote cycling, however, not only objective safety in cycling should be considered, as is the case in the coalition agreement. Subjective...

References

  1. Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie (2019). Unfallatlas. https://unfallatlas.statistikportal.de/.
  2. Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur (2019). Verkehr in Zahlen 2018/2017. https://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/DE/Publikationen/G/verkehr-in-zahlen_2018-pdf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
  3. Chataway, E. S., Kaplan, S., Nielsen, T. A. S., & Prato, C. G. (2014). Safety perceptions and reported behavior related to cycling in mixed traffic: A comparison between Brisbane and Copenhagen. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 23, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dastageeri, H., Rodrigues, P., & Silberer, J. (2019). Happy or Scared: Detecting Emotions of Pedelec Drivers in Urban Areas. Preceedings Smart Data Smart Cities.Google Scholar
  5. Fowler, S. L., Berrigan, D., & Pollack, K. M. (2017). Perceived barriers to bicycling in an urban U.S. environment. Journal of Transport & Health, 6, 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geofabrik GmbH Karlsruhe (2018). Rohdaten. https://www.geofabrik.de/data/download.html.
  7. Goodman, J. K., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds_pr.html.
  9. Kamargianni, M., Dubey, S., Polydoropoulou, A., & Bhat, C. (2015). Investigating the subjective and objective factors influencing teenagers’ school travel mode choice—An integrated choice and latent variable model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kohn, L., Dastageeri, H., Bäumer, T., Moulin, S., Müller, P., & Coors, V. (2018). Hot or Not—Identifying Emotional Hot Spots in the City. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, IV-4/W7, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W7-67-2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kovácsová, N., Winter, J.C.F. de, Schwab, A. L., Christoph, M., Twisk, D.A.M., & Hagenzieker, M. P. (2016). Riding performance on a conventional bicycle and a pedelec in low speed exercises: Objective and subjective evaluation of middle-aged and older persons. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart Abteilung Kommunikation (2019, February 21). Gemeinderat fasst Grundsatzbeschluss zum Radverkehr. Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, Abteilung Kommunikation Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart Stadtmessungsamt (n. d.). Stuttgart3D. https://www.stuttgart.de/3d.
  13. Liu, Z., Jia, X., & Cheng, W. (2012). Solving the Last Mile Problem: Ensure the Success of Public Bicycle System in Beijing. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 43, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Polizeipräsidium Stuttgart. (2019). Bericht zur Unfalllage 2018.Google Scholar
  15. Ein neuer Aufbruch für Europa, Eine neue Dynamik für Deutschland, Ein neuer Zusammenhalt für unser Land (2018).Google Scholar
  16. Rodrigues da Silva, A. N., Zeile, P., Aguiar, F. d. O., Papastefanou, G., & Bergner, B. S. (2014). Smart Sensoring and Barrier Free Planning. In A. P. Antunes, J. A. Tenedório, J. Roca Cladera, & N. N. Pinto (Eds.), Advances in Civil and Industrial Engineering. Technologies for urban and spatial planning: Virtual cities and territories (Vol. 17, pp. 93–112). Hershey, Pennsylvania (701 E. Chocolate Avenue, Hershey, Pa., 17033, USA): IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4349-9.ch005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Runder Tisch GIS e. V. (2018). Hackathon: Neue Wege für die Mobilität in Augsburg. Retrieved from https://www.neue-wege-augsburg.de/.
  18. Schmidt, S., & Stülpnagel, R. von (2018). Risk Perception and Gaze Behavior during Urban Cycling—A Field Study. https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-B-000222474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schreier, H. (2018). ADFC Fahrradklimatest 2018: Stuttgart. Retrieved from https://www.fahrradklima-test.de/.
  20. Silberer, J., Hieber, N., & Bäumer, T. (2019). Wie Apps Fahrradfahren zum Erlebnis machen: Förderung nachhaltiger Mobilitätsformen mittels digitaler Anwendungen. In E. Lochmahr, P. Müller, P. Planing, & T. Popovic (Eds.), Digitalen Wandel gestalten: Transdisziplinäre Ansätze aus Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft (1st ed., pp. 165–174). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24651-8_5.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sørensen, M., & Mosslemi, M. (2009). Subjective and objective safety: The effect of road safety measures on subjective safety among vulnerable road users. Oslo: Insitute of Transport Economics.Google Scholar
  22. Sousa, A. A. de, Sanches, S. P., & Ferreira, M. A.G. (2014). Perception of Barriers for the Use of Bicycles. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 160, 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weng, J., Bäumer, T., & Müller, P. (2020). Bike-sharing systems as integral components of inner-city mobility concepts: An analysis of the intended user behavior of potential and actual bike-sharing users. In P. Planing, P. Müller, P. Dehdari, & T. Bäumer (Eds.), Innovations for Metropolitan Regions. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Wirth, T. von, Grêt-Regamey, A., & Stauffacher, M. (2015). Mediating Effects Between Objective and Subjective Indicators of Urban Quality of Life: Testing Specific Models for Safety and Access. Social Indicators Research, 122(1), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0682-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wundersee, P. (2019). Mehr Radfahrer sterben bei Unfällen: Verkehrstote 2019. Retrieved from https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/verkehrstote-radfahrer-unfaelle-101.html.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Silberer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thunyathep Santhanavanich
    • 1
  • Patrick Müller
    • 2
  • Thomas Bäumer
    • 2
  1. 1.HFT StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.HFT StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations