Advertisement

Bi-proportional Apportionments

  • Mirko BezziEmail author
  • Gianfranco Gambarelli
  • Giuliana Angela Zibetti
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11890)

Abstract

An apportionment method is proposed that generalises Hamilton’s method for matrices, optimising proportionality in both directions, both for rows and columns. The resulting matrix respects fixed totals for rows and columns even when such totals do not satisfy standard criteria (monotonicity, maximum or minimum Hare), for example following the allocation of majority prizes to parties or coalitions.

Optionally, if required, the result can also respect the minimum Hare quotae for rows and columns. The algorithm may easily be expressed on the basis of rules.

Keywords

Bi-proportional Apportionment Electoral system Calculation software 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is under the patronage of MIUR. The authors wish to thank Luciano Violante for his valuable comments on a previous version of this paper, and Angelo Uristani for useful discussions on a local level seat assignation method.

References

  1. 1.
    Demange, G.: On allocating seats to parties and districts: apportionments. In: Fragnelli, V., Gambarelli, G. (eds.) Open Problems in Applications of Cooperative Games - a Special Issue of International Game Theory Review, vol. 15, no. 3 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gambarelli, G.: Minimax apportionments. Group Decis. Negot. 8(6), 441–461 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gambarelli, G., Palestini, A.: Minimax multi-district apportionments. Homo Oecon. 24(3/4), 335–356 (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gambarelli, G., Stach, I.: Power indices in politics; some results and open problems. Essays in honor of Hannu Nurmi. Homo Oecon. 26(3/4), 417–441 (2009). ISBN 978–3-89265-072-0, ISSN 0943-0180Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamilton, A.: Proposal of apportionment approved by U.S.A. Congress (1791)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maier, S., Pukelsheim, F.: BAZI: a free computer program for proportional representation apportionment. Preprint Nr. 042-2007. Institut fur Mathematik, Universitat Augsburg (2007). www.opus-bayern.de/uni-augsburg/volltexte/2007/711/
  7. 7.
    Pukelsheim, F.: Current issues of apportionment methods. In: Simeone, B., Pukelsheim, F. (eds.) Mathematics and Democracy: Recent Advances in Voting Systems and Collective Choice. Studies in Choice and Welfare, pp. 167–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35605-3_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pukelsheim, F., Ricca, F., Scozzari, A., Serafini, P., Simeone, B.: Network flow methods for electoral systems. Networks 59, 73–88 (2011). Special Issue on the INOC 2009 Conference, April 26–29, 2009, Pisa, ItalyMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Website of the Italian Ministry of Interior “Historical Archives of the Elections”, edited by the Office IV - Election Informatics Services. (http://elezionistorico.interno.it). Accessed 19 Dec 2015
  10. 10.
    Minutes of operations of the Central National Electoral Office of March 20, 2018 (http://www.cortedicassazione.it/corte-di-cassazione/it/elezioni.page). Accessed 26 Apr 2018
  11. 11.
    Italian Law December 21, 2005, n. 270 Changes to the rules for the election of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate of the Republic (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Economics and Quantitative MethodsUniversity of BergamoBergamoItaly

Personalised recommendations