Advertisement

Studien zu peritonealen Adhäsionen

  • Michaela Liedler
Chapter
  • 25 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Peritoneale Adhäsionen sind seit Langem als postoperative Komplikation erkannt und erforscht. In zahlreichen Studien konnten damit verbundene Langzeitauswirkungen wie Rückenschmerzen, Schulterschmerzen oder chronische Verspannungen des Schultergürtel-Nackenbereiches ebenso wie Verdauungsprobleme oder Infertilität nachgewiesen werden. Ein Vorbeugen gegen peritoneale Adhäsionen und fasziale Verklebungen ist praktisch unmöglich. Leider sind auch Ansätze zur manualtherapeutischen Intervention bzw. zur postoperativen Behandlung rar gesät, wenn auch das Interesse daran aktuell stark gestiegen ist. Ein kurzer Abriss über den momentanen wissenschaftlichen Stand soll als Einstieg in dieses spannende und umfassende Themengebiet dienen und aufzeigen, welche Erfahrungen diesbezüglich bisher gemacht werden konnten. Nicht zuletzt ist das Liedler-Konzept als manuelles fasziales Behandlungskonzept von postoperativen peritonealen Adhäsionen ein weiterer großer Schritt in diese Richtung.

Literatur

  1. Arung W, Meurisse M, Detry O (2011) Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J Gastroenterol 17(41):4.545–4.553Google Scholar
  2. Bove, GM, Chapelle, SL (2012) Visceral mobilization can lyse and prevent peritoneal adhesions in a rat model. J Bodyw Movement Ther 16(1):76–82Google Scholar
  3. Bove GM, Chapelle SL, Hanion KE, Diamond MP, Mokler DJ (2017) Attenuation of postoperative adhesions using a modeled manual therapy. PLoS One 12(6):e0178407PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bove GM, Naylor M, Bushnell, MC (2018) Complementary and integrative approaches for pain management. Biomed Sci Fac Publ 23:1–11Google Scholar
  5. ten Broek RPG, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJP et al (2013) Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systemic review and met-analysis. BMJ 347:f5588PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Brüggmann D, Tschartchian G, Wallwiener M, Münstedt K et al (2010) Intra-abdominal adhesions definition, origin, significance in surgical practice, and treatment options. Dtsch Ärztebl int 107(44):769–775PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Chamorro Comesaña A, del Pilar Suarez Vicente M, Ferreira TD, del Mar Perez-La Fuente Varela et al (2017) Effect of myofascial induction therapy on post-c-section scars, more than one and a half years old. Pilot study. J Bodyw Mov Ther 21:197–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapelle SL, Bove GM (2013) Visceral massage reduces postoperative ileus in a rat model. J Bodyw Mov Ther 17(1):83–88Google Scholar
  9. Coccolini F, Luca A, Roberto M et al (2013) Peritoneal adhesion index (PAI): proposal of a score for the ignored iceberg’ of medicine and surgery. World J Emerg Surg 8:1–6Google Scholar
  10. DiZerega GS, Campeau JD (2001) Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Update 7:547–555PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Donnelly C, Wilton J (2002) The effect of massage to scars on active range of motion and skin mobility. Hand Ther 7(1):5–11Google Scholar
  12. Fritz M, Adamson GD, Barnhart K et al (2007) Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery. Fertil Steril 88(1):21–26Google Scholar
  13. Kobesova A, Lewit K (2000) A case of a pathogenic active scar. ACO 9(1):17–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kobesova A, Morris CE, Lewit K, Safarova M (2007) Twenty-year-old pathogenic „active“ postsurgical scar: a case study of a patient with persistent right lower quadrant pain. J Manip Physiol Ther 30(3):234–238Google Scholar
  15. Lewit K, Olsanka S (2004) Clinical importance of active scars: abnormal scars as a cause of myofascial pain. J Manip Physiol Ther 27(6):399–402Google Scholar
  16. Liakakos T, Thomakakos N, Fine PM, Dervenis C, Young RL (2001) Peritoneal adhesions. Etiology, pathophysiology and clinical significance. Dig Surg 18:260–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Liedler M (2017) „Einfluss von postoperativen Adhäsionen nach Sektio auf chronischen Low Back Pain − eine Pilotstudie“. Masterthese, DUK, KremsGoogle Scholar
  18. Menzies D, Ellis H (1990) Intestinal obstruction from adhesions − how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72:60–63PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Pados G, Venetis CA, Almaloglou K, Tarlatzis BC (2010) Prevention of intra-peritoneal adhesions in gynaecological surgery: theory and evidence. Reprod BioMed Online 21:290–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.04.021PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Patel S, Yadav A (2016) Prevention of adhesion in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Int J Reprod Contracept, Obstet Gynecol 5(12):4.099–4.105Google Scholar
  21. Probst, P, Büchler, E, Doerr-Harim, C, Knebel, P, Thiel, B, Ulrich, A, Diener, MK (2016) Randomised controlled pilot trial on feasibility, safety and effectiveness of osteopathic MANipulative treatment following major abdominal surgery (OMANT pilot trial). Int J Osteopath Med 20:31–40Google Scholar
  22. Raul MR, del Rio FG (2013) Mechanistic basis of manual therapy in myofascial injuries. Sonoelastographic evolution control. J Bodyw Mov Ther 17:221–234Google Scholar
  23. Rice AD, King R, Reed ED’A, Patterson K, Wurn BF et al (2013) Manual physical therapy for non-surgical treatment of adhesion-related small bowel obstructions: two case reports. J Clin Med 2(1):1–12PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Rice AD, Patterson K, Reed ED’A et al (2016) Treating small bowel obstruction with a maualphysical therapy: a prospective efficacy study. BioMed Res Int 2016:8.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7610387Google Scholar
  25. Rice AD, Patterson K, Reed ED’A, Wurn BF, Robles K et al (2018) Decreasing recurrent bowel obstructions, improving quality of life with physiotherapy: controlled study. World J Gastroenterol 24(19):2.108–2.119.  https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i19.2108Google Scholar
  26. Shin TM, Bordeaux JS (2012) The role of massage in scar management: a literature review. Dermatol Surg 38(3):414–423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stanziu D, Menzies D (2007) The magnitude of adhesion-related problems. Color Dis 9(2):35–38Google Scholar
  28. Sulaiman H, Giorgio G, Christine D, Mutsaers SE et al (2000) Growth of nerve fibres into murine peritoneal adhesions. J Pathol 192(3):396–403Google Scholar
  29. Tabibian N, Swehli E, Boyd A, Umbreen A, Tabibian JH (2017) Abdominal adhesions: a practical review of an often overlooked entity. Ann Med Surg 15:9–13Google Scholar
  30. Thomas JR, Hom DB (2019) Facial Scars: Surgical Revision and Treatment. PMPH USA, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. Valouchova P, Lewit K (2009) Surface electromyography of abdominal and back muscles in patients with active scars. J Bodyw Mov Ther 13:262–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Baal JOAM, Van de Vijver KK, Niewland R, Van Noorden CJF et al (2016) The histophysiology and pathophysiology of the peritoneum. Tissue Cell 49:95–105Google Scholar
  33. Wasserman JB, Abraham K, Massery M, Chu J et al (2018) Soft tissue mobilization techniques are effective in treating chronic pain following cesarean section: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am Phys Ther Assoc 42(3):9Google Scholar
  34. Wasserman JB, Copeland M, Upp M, Abraham K (2019) Effect of soft tissue mobilization techniques on adhesion-related pain and function in the abdomen: a systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 23(2):262–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Weibel M-A, Majno G (1973) Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery: A postmortem study. Am J Surg 126(3):345–353Google Scholar
  36. Wurn BF, Wurn LJ, King R et al (2004a) Treating female infertility and improving IVF pregnancy rates with a manual physical therapy technique. Medscape Gen Med 6(2):51Google Scholar
  37. Wurn LJ, Wurn BF, Roscow AS, King R, Scharf ES, Shuster JJ (2004b) Increasing orgasm and decreasing dyspareunia by a manual physical therapy technique. Medscape Gen Med 6(4):47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michaela Liedler
    • 1
  1. 1.WienÖsterreich

Personalised recommendations