Advertisement

Leitfaden für die Identifikation, Auswahl und Kombination von Gamification-Elementen am Beispiel des Lernkontextes

  • Sofia SchöbelEmail author
  • Matthias Söllner
Chapter
Part of the Kompetenzmanagement in Organisationen book series (KOOR)

Zusammenfassung

Gamification ist ein bekannter Ansatz, bei dem sogenannte Spieldesignelemente in Informationssysteme integriert werden. Entgegen des bisherigen Erfolges des Ansatzes gibt es viele Unstimmigkeiten in Bezug auf das Design von Spieldesignelementen, besonders wenn es um die Anpassung der Elemente an eine bestimmte Zielgruppe geht. Dieser Beitrag stellt eine neue Klassifikation von Spieldesignelementen wie auch einen Prozess vor, mit dem Gamification-Konzepte Schritt für Schritt entwickelt und an eine Zielgruppe angepasst werden können. Der Prozess wird anhand des Lernkontextes detailliert vorgestellt und gibt so Praktikern/Praktikerinnen und Forschenden eine Vorstellung, wie Gamification-Ansätze systematisch entwickelt werden können. Durch die Entwicklung des Prozesses können für die Praxis Hilfestellungen gegeben werden, um Gamification-Ansätze zu entwickeln. Weiterhin liefert die Klassifikation der Spieldesignelemente einen theoretischen Beitrag zur Gamification-Literatur.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Alcivar, I., & Abad, A. G. (2016). Design and evaluation of a gamified system for ERP training. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Attali, Y., & Areli-Attali, M. (2015). Gamification in assessment: Do points affect test performance. Computers & Education, 83, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baek, E.-O., Cagiltay, K., Boling, E., & Frick, T. (2008). User-centered design and development. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 1, 660–668.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bjork, S., & Holopainen, J. (2004). Patterns in game design. Boston: Charles River Media.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boticki, I., Baksa, J., Seow, P., & Looi, C.-K. (2015). Usage of a mobile social learning platform with virtual badges in primary school. Computers & Education, 86, 120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bui, A., & Veit, D. (2015). The effects of gamification on driver behavior: An example from a free float carsharing service. In Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (S. 1–14).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bunchball, I. (2010). Gamification 101: An introduction to the use of game dynamics to influence behavior. (White Paper). Bunchball Inc.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burgers, C., Eden, A., van Engelenburg, M. D., & Buningh, S. (2015). How feedback boosts motivation in play in a brain-training game. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burke, M., & Hiltbrand, T. (2011). How gamification will change business intelligence. Business Intelligence Journal, 16(2), 8–16.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng, M.-T., Lin, Y.-W., & She, H.-C. (2015). Learning through playing virtual age: Exploring the interactions among student concept learning, gaming performance, in-game behaviors, and the use of in-game characters. Computers & Education, 86, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheong, C., Cheong, F., & Filippou, J. (2013). Quick quiz: A gamified approach for enhancing learning. In PACIS.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Christy, K. R., & Fox, J. (2014). Leaderboards in a virtual classroom: A test of stereotype threat and social comparison explanations for women’s math performance. Computers & Education, 78, 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., & Peytchev, A. (2010). The impact of progress indicators on task completion. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Denny, P. (2013). The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (S. 763–772).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems S. 2425–2428.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diseth, Å., & Kobbeltvedt, T. (2010). A mediation analysis of achievement motives, goals, learning strategies, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 671–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Páges, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J.-J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Faghihi, U., Brautigam, A., Jorgenson, K., Martin, D., Brown, A., Measures, E., & Maldonado-Bouchard, S. (2014). How gamification applies for educational purpose specially with college algebra. Procedia Computer Science, 41, 182–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Filsecker, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2014). A multilevel analysis of the effects of external rewards on elementary students‘ motivation, engagement and learning in an educational game. Computers & Education, 75, 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gnauk, B., Dannecker, L., & Hahmann, M. (2012). Leveraging gamification in demand dispatch systems. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint EDBT/ICDT Workshops (S. 103–110).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hamari, J. (2013). Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12, 236–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2015). “Working out for likes”: An empirical study on social influence in exercise gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?: A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hess, T. J., McNab, A. L., & Basoglu, K. A. (2014). Reliability generalization of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and behavioral intentions. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hew, K. F., Huang, B., Chu, K. W. S., & Chiu, D. K. W. (2016). Engaging Asian students through game mechanics: Findings from two experiment studies. Computers & Education, 92, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo Ludens. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI (Bd. 4, Nr. 1, S. 1722).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li, W., Grossman, T., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2012). GamiCAD: A gamified tutorial system for first time autocad users. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (S. 103–112).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lin, L., Atkinson, R. K., Christopherson, R. M., Joseph, S. S., & Harrison, C. J. (2013). Animated agents and learning: Does the type of verbal feedback they provide matter. Computers & Education, 67, 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu, Y., Alexandrova, T., & Nakajima, T. (2011). Gamifying intelligent environments. In Proceedings of the 2011 international ACM workshop on Ubiquitous meta user interfaces (S. 7–12).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Tuch, A. N., & Opwis, K. (2017). Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y.-F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Passos, E. B., Medeiros, D. B., Neto, P. A. S., & Clua, E. W. G. (2011). Turning real-world software development into a game. In Proceedings of SB Games (S. 260–269).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Reed, W. A. (2014). User-centered design: A guide to ROI with ISO 9241-210. Texology Science.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Santhanam, R., Liu, D., & Shen, W.-C. M. (2016). Research note-gamification of technology-mediated training: Not all competitions are the same. Information Systems Research, 27(2), 453–465.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Scheiner, C. W., & Witt, M. (2013). The backbone of gamification – A theoretical consideration of play and game mechanics (S. 2372–2386). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik eV.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schlagenhaufer, C., & Amberg, M. (2015). A descriptive literature review and classification framework for gamification in information systems. In European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2005). Achievement goals, task performance, and interest: Why perceived goal difficulty matters. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(12), 1739–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shen, W.-C. M., Liu, D., Santhanam, R., & Evans, D. A. (2016). Gamified technology-mediated learning: The role of individual differences. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shute, V. J., D’Mello, S., Baker, R., Cho, K., Bosch, N., Ocumpaugh, J., Ventura, M., & Almeda, V. (2015). Modeling how incoming knowledge, persistence, affective states, and in-game progress influence student learning from an educational game. Computers & Education, 86, 224–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Suh, A., Wagner, C., & Liu, L. (2015). The effects of game dynamics on user engagement in gamified systems. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICCS).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thiebes, S., Lins, S., & Basten, D. (2014). Gamifying information systems: A synthesis of gamification mechanics and dynamics. In European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Urh, M., Vukovic, G., & Jereb, E. (2015). The model for introduction of gamification into e-learning in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 388–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Riemer, K., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2015). Standing on the shoulders of giants: Challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(9), 205–244.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13–23.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wu, Y., Kankanhalli, A., & Huang, K.-W. (2015). Gamification in fitness apps: How do leaderboards influence exercise? In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & behavior, 9(6), 772–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fachgebiet WirtschaftsinformatikUniversität KasselKasselDeutschland
  2. 2.Fachgebiet Wirtschaftsinformatik und SystementwicklungUniversität KasselKasselDeutschland

Personalised recommendations