Advertisement

Technik der Stomaanlage

  • Igors IesalnieksEmail author
Chapter
  • 19 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Präoperative Markierung, Ausleiten des Stomas mindestens 1 cm über dem Hautniveau und vollständiger mukokutaner Kontakt sind die wichtigsten Anforderungen an die Stomaanlage. Ausgedehnte Voroperationen, Notfallsituationen und Adipositas können zu erheblichen technischen Schwierigkeiten führen. In diesem Kapitel wird die Technik der konventionellen und der laparoskopischen Stomaanlage beschrieben und Praxistipps für „schwierige“ Stomaanlagen vorgestellt.

Literatur

  1. Beck DE (2011) The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery. Springer, New York, S 522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Block GE, Moossa AR (1994) Operative Colorectal Surgery. W.B. Saunders, S 448Google Scholar
  3. Brooke BN (1952) The management of an ileostomy, including its complications. Lancet 2(6725):102–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corman ML (2013) Corman’s colon and rectal surgery. Wolter Kluwer, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Correa-Marinez A, Grenabo J, Bock D, Wedin A, Angenete E (2018) The type of stoma matters-morbidity in patients with obstructing colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 33(12):1773–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cottam J, Richards K, Hasted A, Blackman A (2007) Results of a nationwide prospective audit of stoma complications within 3 weeks of surgery. Colorectal Dis 9(9):834–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ein SH (1984) Divided loop colostomy that does not prolapse. Am J Surg 147(2):250–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Keighly M, Williams N (1994) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. Balliere Tindall 2:198Google Scholar
  9. Khoo RE, Cohen MM, Chapman GM, Jenken DA, Langevin JM (1994) Loop ileostomy for temporary fecal diversion. Am J Surg 167(5):519–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leong AP, Londono-Schimmer EE, Phillips RK (1994) Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy. Br J Surg 81(5):727–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu J, Bruch HP et al (2005) Stoma formation for fecal diversion: a plea for the laparoscopic approach. Tech Coloproctol 9:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Veidenheimer MC (1993) Obstruction after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a preventable complication? Dis Colon Rectum 36(12):1105–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Myrelid P, Söderholm JD, Olaison G, Sjödahl R, Andersson P (2012) Split stoma in resectional surgery of high-risk patients with ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Colorectal Dis 14:188–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oliveira L, Reissman P et al (1997) Laparoscopic creation of stomas. Surg Endosc 11:19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Prasad ML, Pearl RK, Abcarian H (1984) End-loop colostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 158(4):380–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Schumpelick V (1997) Operationsatlas Chirurgie. Enke, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  17. Shellito PC (1998) Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 41(12):1562–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sier MF, Wisselink DD, Ubbink DT, Oostenbroek RJ, Veldink GJ, Lamme B, van Duijvendijk P, van Geloven AAW, Eijsbouts QAJ, Bemelman WA (2018) ISI trial study group. Randomized clinical trial of intracutaneously versus transcutaneously sutured ileostomy to prevent stoma-related complications (ISI trial). Br J Surg 105(6):637–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Speirs M, Leung E, Hughes D, Robertson I, Donnelly L, Mackenzie I, Macdonald A (2006) Ileostomy rod–is it a bridge too far? Colorectal Dis 8:484–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Strong SA (1994) The difficult stoma: challenges and strategies. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 29(2):152–159Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Endokrine und Minimal-Invasive ChirurgieKlinikum BogenhausenMünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations