Advertisement

Diagnosis and Classification of Rotator Cuff Tears

  • Emilio CalvoEmail author
  • Carlos Rebollón Guardado
  • Diana Morcillo
  • Guillermo Arce
Chapter

Abstract

Rotator cuff pathology is the most common condition affecting the shoulder. The clinical results of rotator cuff repair in symptomatic patients are good to excellent in a high percentage of cases. These observations underline the weight of diagnosing this pathology correctly. Although many classification systems have been used to describe rotator cuff tears in the orthopedic literature, there is a lack of a current standard classification that includes all the types of rotator cuff tears, the characteristics of the tears and is being used universally. Possible factors contributing to this situation could be a poor interobserver agreement, inaccuracy, incompleteness, or complexity. An improved evaluation of the rotator cuff tears, the advances in imaging methods, and the advent of arthroscopy, in particular, have provided better opportunities to understand and treat these lesions. This paper describes (1) a comprehensive review of diagnostic methods for rotator cuff tears and (2) the ISAKOS rotator cuff tear classification system.

References

  1. 1.
    Ellman H. Diagnosis, and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(254):64–74.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davidson J, Burkhart SS. The geometric classification of rotator cuff tears: a system linking tear pattern to treatment and prognosis. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(3):417–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeOrio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(4):563–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harryman DT 2nd, et al. Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(7):982–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J. The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(4):505–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Snyder S. Arthroscopic classification of rotator cuff lesions and surgical decision making. In: Snyder S, editor. Shoulder arthroscopy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. p. 201–7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weber SC. Arthroscopic debridement and acromioplasty versus mini-open repair in the treatment of significant partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(2):126–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sano H, Wakabayashi I, Itoi E. Stress distribution in the supraspinatus tendon with partial-thickness tears: an analysis using two-dimensional finite element model. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2006;15(1):100–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Denard PJ, Ladermann A, Burkhart SS. Arthroscopic management of subscapularis tears. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011;19(4):333–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lafosse L, et al. Structural integrity and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(6):1184–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oh JH, et al. Prognostic factors affecting anatomic outcome of rotator cuff repair and correlation with functional outcome. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(1):30–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goutallier D, et al. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;(304):78–83.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fuchs B, et al. Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1999;8(6):599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melis B, et al. Natural history of fatty infiltration and atrophy of the supraspinatus muscle in rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(6):1498–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meyer DC, et al. Quantitative analysis of muscle and tendon retraction in chronic rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(3):606–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meyer DC, et al. Retraction of supraspinatus muscle and tendon as predictors of success of rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(10):2242–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hersche O, Gerber C. Passive tension in the supraspinatus musculotendinous unit after long-standing rupture of its tendon: a preliminary report. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1998;7(4):393–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meyer DC, et al. Amplitude and strength of muscle contraction are reduced in experimental tears of the rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(7):1456–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCarron JA, et al. Failure with continuity in rotator cuff repair “healing”. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(1):134–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lippe J, et al. Inter-rater agreement of the Goutallier, Patte, and Warner classification scores using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(2):154–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Patte D. Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(254):81–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAKOS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emilio Calvo
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Carlos Rebollón Guardado
    • 1
    • 2
  • Diana Morcillo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guillermo Arce
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and TraumatologyIIS-Fundación Jiménez DíazMadridSpain
  2. 2.Universidad AutónomaMadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryInstituto Argentino de Diagnóstico y TratamientoBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations