Minimally Invasive Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures Using the Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) Arthrex Device

  • A. Nguyen
  • J. CalderEmail author


Spontaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon is a debilitating injury that requires prompt treatment to oppose the tendon ends and protect in an equinus position. There is controversy regarding the decision for operative vs. non-operative treatment, and a variety of surgical techniques are described. Percutaneous repair risks injury to the sural nerve and mini-open surgical approach aims to provide a surgical repair whilst minimising the risk of wound complications and sural nerve injury. This also aims to provide enough strength in the repair to allow early active rehabilitation.


Achilles tendon Achilles rupture Mini-open Percutaneous Surgical repair Surgical technique 



All images courtesy of Arthrex Inc.


  1. 1.
    Wagner E, Ortiz C. Mini-open Achilles tendon repair: perspective 2. In: Weisel S, editor. Operative techniques in orthopaedic surgery, vol. 4. 2nd ed. Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer; 2016. p. 4985–90.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Movin T, Ryberg A, McBride DJ, et al. Acute rupture of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005;10:331–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soroceanu A, Sidhwa F, Glazebrook M, et al. Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:2136–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Renninger C, Kuhn K, Fellars T, et al. Operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures in active duty military population. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(3):269–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosso C, Buckland D, Valderrabano V, et al. Long-term biomechanical outcomes after Achilles tendon ruptures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(3):890–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holm C, Kjaer M, Eliasson P. Achilles tendon rupture-treatment and complications. A systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(1):e1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khan R, Carey SR. Surgical interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;9:CD003674.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hsu A, Carroll P, Anderson R, et al. Clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous Achilles repair system vs. open technique for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(11):1279–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McWilliam J, Mackay G. The internal brace for midsubstance Achilles ruptures. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(7):794–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arthrex Research and Development. Achilles Midsubstance Speedbridge vs. Krakow for Midsubstance Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair. 2015.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arthrex Research and Development. Mechanical and Biomechanical Comparison testing of 1.3mm SutureTape Sutures. 2017.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Calder J, Freeman R, Ackermann P, et al. Meta-analysis and suggested guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in foot and ankle surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:1409–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAKOS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopaedic Surgery DepartmentFortius ClinicLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of BioengineeringImperial College, South Kensigton CampusLondonUK

Personalised recommendations