Advertisement

Synercube – die wissenschaftliche Theorie für effektives Zusammenwirken in der Organisation

  • Anatoly ZankovskyEmail author
  • Christiane von der Heiden
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Jede Organisation stellt die Gesamtheit der Komponenten und deren Zusammenhänge dar, die als Einheit fungieren (Katz, Kahn, The social psychology of organizations, Wiley, New York, 1966). Um diese Gesamtheit zu erhalten, benötigt die Organisation Ressourcen (Information, Energie, Geldmittel, Personal, Ausrüstung u. a. m.), die von außen in die Organisation hineinfließen und die für die Tätigkeit der Organisation nötig sind. Im Laufe der Tätigkeit gestaltet bzw. transformiert die Organisation Ressourcen in Ergebnisse: Produkte, Waren, Dienstleistungen, Informationen usw., die dann nach außen (Markt, Kunden) abfließen, um Gewinn zu erwirtschaften.

Literatur

Bücher

  1. Bass B (1960) Leadership, psychology and organizational behavior. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennis W, Nanus B (1985) Führungskräfte: die vier Schlüsselstrategien erfolgreichen Führens. Campus, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  3. Beugre C (1998) Managing fairness in organizations. Quorum Books, WestportGoogle Scholar
  4. Blake R, Mouton J (1964) The managerial grid. Gulf, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  5. Creusen U, Bock R, Thiele C (2013) Führung ist dreidimensional. In: Crisand E, Raab G, Crisand N (Hrsg) Arbeitshefte Führungspsychologie, Bd. 69. Windmühle, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  6. Durkheim E (1924) Sociologie et Philosophie. Alcan, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Durkheim E (1950) Leçons de sociologie. Presses universitaires de France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. Ermolayeva EP (2008) Psychology of social realization in occupation. IPRAS Publishing House, Moskau (Russische Version)Google Scholar
  9. Fiedler F (1967) A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Filley A, House R, Kerr S (1976) Managerial process and organizational behavior, 2. Aufl. Scott, Foresman, GlenviewGoogle Scholar
  11. Hersey P, Blanchard K (1993) Management of organizational behavior utilizing human resources, 8. Aufl. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  12. Katz D, Kahn R (1966) The social psychology of organizations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Kehne T (2009) Lässt sich Verantwortung normen? Überlegungen zu Rolle und Funktion von Standards im Themenfeld Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Aßländer M, Senge K (Hrsg) Corporate Social Responsibility im Einzelhandel. Metropolis, Marburg, S 209–236Google Scholar
  14. Kupreychenko A (2008) Psychology of trust and distrust. IPRAS Publishing House, Moskau (Russische Version)Google Scholar
  15. Lane C, Bachmann R (Hrsg) (1998) Trust within and between organizations. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Lawler E (1992) The ultimate advantage: create the high involvement organization. Joss Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  17. Likert R (1961) New patterns of management. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Locke E (1991) The essence of management. Lexington Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Mayo E (1933) The human problems of an industrial civilization. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Misumi J (1985) The behavioural science of leadership: an interdisciplinary Japanese research program. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  21. Mowday R, Porter L, Steers R (1982) Employee-organization linkages: the psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Parygin B (1973) Management and leadership. LGPU, St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  23. Reddin W (1970) Managerial effectiveness. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Robbins S, Judge T (2009) Organizational behavior. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  25. Roethlisberger F, Dickson W (1939) Management and the worker. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Sheppard B, Lewicki R, Minton J (1992) Organizational justice: the search for fairness in the workplace. Lexington Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Steiner I (1972) Group process and productivity. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Stogdill R (1974) Handbook of leadership: a survey of theory and research. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Yukl G (1994) Leadership in organizations. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  30. Zankovsky A (2011) Psychology of leadership: from behavioral model to value/cultural paradigm. IPRAS Publishing House, MoskauGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhuravlev A, Kupreychenko A (2003) Ethics in psychological regulation of business activity. IPRAS Publishing House, Moskau (Russische Version)Google Scholar

Zeitschriftenartikel

  1. Bass B (1990) From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Organ Dyn 18(3):19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caldwell C, Hayes L, Long DT (2010) Leadership, trustworthiness, and ethical stewardship. J Bus Ethics 96:497–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conger J (1990) The dark side of leadership. Organ Dyn 19(2):44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fleischman E, Harris E (1962) Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and turnover. Pers Psychol 15(2):43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hersey P, Blanchard K (1982) Leadership style: attitudes and behaviors. Train Dev J 36:50–52Google Scholar
  6. Hosmer LT (1995) Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Acad Manage Rev 20:379–403MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ingham A, Levinger G, Graves J, Peckman V (1974) The Ringelmann effect: studies of group size and group performance. J Exp Soc Psychol 10:371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kravitz D, Martin B (1986) Ringelmann rediscovered: the original article. J Pers Soc Psychol 50(5):936–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kristof-Brown A, Zimmermann R, Johnson E (2005) Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group and person-supervisor fit. J Pers Psychol 58:281–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Larson L, Hunt J, Osborn R (1976) The great Hi-Hi leader behavior myth: a lesson from Occam’s razor. Acad Manage J 19(4):628–641Google Scholar
  11. Lewin K, Lippitt R (1938) An experimental approach to the study of autocracy and democracy: a preliminary note. Sociometry 1:292–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Misumi J, Shirakashi S (1966) An experimental study of the effects of supervisory behavior on productivity and moral in a hierarchical organization. Hum Relat 19:297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nystrom P (1978) Managers and the Hi-Hi leader myth. Acad Manage J 21(2):325–331Google Scholar
  14. Radoilska L (2008) Truthfulness and business. J Bus Ethics 79:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tannenbaum R, Schmidt W (1973) How to choose a leadership pattern. Harv Bus Rev 51(5–6):162–180Google Scholar
  16. Turker D (2009) How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. J Bus Ethics 89:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Vianen A, De Pater I, Van Dijk F (2007) Work value fit and turnover intention: some source or different source fit. J Manage Psychol 22(2):188–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vroom V (1973) A new look at managerial decision making. Organ Dyn 1(4):66–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vroom V, Jago A (1978) On the validity of the Vroom-Yetten model. J Apl Psychol 63:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Westermann J, Cyr L (2004) An integrative analysis of person-organization fit theories. Int J Sel Assess 12(3):252–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yammarino F, Bass B (1990) Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Hum Relat 43:975–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Master Thesis

  1. Schumacher S (2014) Leadership dimensions: an empirical integration. Master Thesis, Universität OsnabrückGoogle Scholar

sonstige Literatur

  1. Misumi J (1972) An empirical study of political leadership. Bulletin of the Institute for Industry and Labour. Kyushu University, S 57 (Japanische Ausgabe)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychologisches InstitutRussische Akademie der WissenschaftenMoskauRussland
  2. 2.Synercube GmbHLeverkusenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations