Advertisement

What Is Evidence-Based Medicine?

  • Eleonor Svantesson
  • Eric Hamrin Senorski
  • Jón Karlsson
  • Olufemi R. Ayeni
  • Kristian Samuelsson
Chapter

Abstract

The introduction of the term “evidence-based medicine” (EBM) has been regarded as one of the most important paradigm shifts throughout medical history. The concept originally aimed to educate clinicians on how to perform and interpret scientific evidence in terms of assessment of credibility, critical appraisal of the results, and integration of scientific evidence in the everyday work. The practice of EBM entails the integration of the current best evidence in the clinical decision-making process in terms of the care of every individual patient. Today, finding the best possible evidence is closer than ever, and as researchers and clinicians of today, a deepened understanding of the EBM concept should be considered an obligation. This chapter presents the fundamental principles of EBM, provides methods for incorporating the EBM in the clinical work, and discusses future directions of EBM.

References

  1. 1.
    Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):132–40.  https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000055.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhandari M, Giannoudis PV. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it is not. Injury. 2006;37(4):302–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.01.034.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhandari M, Jain AK. The need for evidence-based orthopedics. Indian J Orthop. 2007;41(1):3.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.30517.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhandari M, Swiontkowski MF, Einhorn TA, Tornetta P 3rd, Schemitsch EH, Leece P, et al. Interobserver agreement in the application of levels of evidence to scientific papers in the American volume of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-a(8):1717–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Codman EA. The classic: a study in hospital efficiency: as demonstrated by the case report of first five years of private hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(6):1778–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2751-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH. Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet. 2017;390(10092):415–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31592-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman B, et al. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17(1):59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Evans D. Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12(1):77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268(17):2420–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grant HM, Tjoumakaris FP, Maltenfort MG, Freedman KB. Levels of evidence in the clinical sports medicine literature: are we getting better over time? Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(7):1738–42.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514530863.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Green SHJ. Glossary of terms in the cochrane collaboration. The cochrane collaboration. 2015. http://www.cochrane.org/sites/deafault/files/uploads/glossary.pdf.
  13. 13.
    Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade OM, Cook JD. Users’ guide to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 2014.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harris JD, Quatman CE, Manring MM, Siston RA, Flanigan DC. How to write a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(11):2761–8.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513497567.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jackson R, Ameratunga S, Broad J, Connor J, Lethaby A, Robb G, et al. The GATE frame: critical appraisal with pictures. Evid Based Med. 2006;11(2):35–8.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm.11.2.35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lind J. A treatise of scurvy. In three parts. Containing an enquiry into the nature, causes and cure, of that disease. Together with a critical and chronological view of what has been published on the subject. Edinburgh: Printed by Sands, Murray, and Cochran; 1753.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lochner HV, Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd. Type-II error rates (beta errors) of randomized trials in orthopaedic trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-a(11):1650–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matthews J. Quantification and quest for medical certainty. Princetion, NY: Princeton University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murad MH, Montori VM, Ioannidis JP, Jaeschke R, Devereaux PJ, Prasad K, et al. How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2014;312(2):171–9.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.5559.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH. Users’ guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993;270(17):2093–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Paynter R, Banez LL, Berliner E, Erinoff E, Lege-Matsuura J, Potter S, et al. EPC methods: an exploration of the use of text-mining software in systematic reviews. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1986;89(Suppl 2):2s–3s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Samuelsson K, Desai N, McNair E, van Eck CF, Petzold M, Fu FH, et al. Level of evidence in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction research: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(4):924–34.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512460647.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Straus ES, Glasziou P, Richardson W, Haynes R. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2005.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Watts G. Let’s pension off the “major breakthrough”. BMJ. 2007;334(Suppl 1):s4.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39034.682778.94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD. Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-a(1):1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAKOS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleonor Svantesson
    • 1
  • Eric Hamrin Senorski
    • 2
  • Jón Karlsson
    • 1
    • 3
  • Olufemi R. Ayeni
    • 4
  • Kristian Samuelsson
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.Department of OrthopaedicsSahlgrenska University HospitalMölndalSweden
  4. 4.Division of Orthopaedic SurgeryMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations