Advertisement

An Advanced Device for Multiplanar Instability Assessment in MRI

  • Renato Andrade
  • Hugo Duarte
  • Rogério Pereira
  • Claudia Arias
  • Ricardo Bastos
  • Sérgio Rodrigues-Gomes
  • Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
  • Rui L. Reis
  • João Espregueira-MendesEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Multiligament knee injuries have low incidence, however are very devastating and require special attention. New approaches in the diagnosis are vital to allows a better assessement of associated lesions, more careful treatment planning and objective follow-up. The Porto-Knee Testing Device (PKTD) shows very promising results in the assessment of knee instability. The goal of the PKTD is to provide both anatomical and functional evaluation of the knee. It is able to carefully assess the knee sagittal and rotational stability. In multiligament injuries, the use of a arthrometric device concomitantly with imaging procedures can provide valuable information for surgical planning and stability restoration procedures. It is also possible in the postoperative follow-up to evaluate residual instability. Herein, we discuss the recent developments related to PKTD in diagnosis of knee ligament lesions and instability assessment.

Keywords

Multiligament Laxity Knee Porto-knee testing device 

References

  1. 1.
    Rihn JA, Cha PS, Groff YJ, Harner CD. The acutely dislocated knee: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12:334–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrade R, Vasta S, Sevivas N, Pereira R, Leal A, Papalia R, et al. Notch morphology is a risk factor for ACL injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J ISAKOS. 2016;1:70–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fernandes MS, Pereira R, Andrade R, Vasta S, Pereira H, Pinheiro JP, et al. Is the femoral lateral condyle’s bone morphology the trochlea of the ACL? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:207–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pereira HFC, Fernandes M, Pereira R, Jones H, Vasconcelos J, Oliveira J, et al. ACL injuries identifiable for pre-participation imagiological analysis: risk factors. In: Doral MN, Karlsson J, editors. Sports injuries: prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation: Springer; 2014. p. 1–15.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andrade R, Pereira H, Espregueira-Mendes J. ACL treatment in 2016–controversy and consensus. Asian J Arthrosc. 2016;1:3–10.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pereira H, Gomes S, Silva L, Cunha A, Oliveira JM, Reis RL, et al. Fundamentals on injuries of knee ligaments in footballers. In: Olivera JM, Reis RL, editors. Regenerative strategies for the treatment of knee joint disabilities: Springer; 2017. p. 289–321.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heijink A, Gomoll AH, Madry H, Drobnič M, Filardo G, Espregueira-Mendes J, et al. Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:423–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vannini F, Spalding T, Andriolo L, Berruto M, Denti M, Espregueira-Mendes J, et al. Sport and early osteoarthritis: the role of sport in aetiology, progression and treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:1786–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Espregueira-Mendes J, Pereira R, Monteiro A, Pereira H, Sevivas N, Varanda P. Sports and anterior cruciate lesions. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique. 2011;97:S472–S6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ohashi B, Ward J, Araujo P, Kfuri M, Pereira H, Espregueira-Mendes J, et al. Partial anterior cruciate ligament ruptures: knee laxity measurements and pivot shift. In: Doral MN, Karlsson J, editors. Sports injuries: prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation: Springer; 2015. p. 1245–58.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skendzel JG, Sekiya JK, Wojtys EM. Diagnosis and management of the multiligament-injured knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:234–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carroll KM, Gregory Cvetanovich M, Heyworth BE, Van de Velde S, Gill TJ IV. Approach to management of the patient with the multiligament-injured knee. Pain. 2013:15.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gimber LH, Scalcione LR, Rowan A, Hardy JC, Melville DM, Taljanovic MS. Multiligamentous injuries and knee dislocations. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44:1559–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giaconi JC, Allen CR, Steinbach LS. Anterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction: clinical, technical, and imaging overview. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;20:129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robertson PL, Schweitzer ME, Bartolozzi AR, Ugoni A. Anterior cruciate ligament tears: evaluation of multiple signs with MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;193:829–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tung GA, Davis L, Wiggins M, Fadale P. Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: primary and secondary signs at MR imaging. Radiology. 1993;188:661–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winters K, Tregonning R. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging of the traumatic knee as determined by arthroscopy. N Z Med J. 2005;118Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pereira H, Gomes S, Vasconcelos JC, Soares L, Pereira R, Oliveira JM et al. MRI laxity assessment. In: Musahl V, Karlsson J, Kuroda R, Zaffagnini S. Rotatory knee instability. Springer; 2017. p. 49–61.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Behairy NH, Dorgham MA, Khaled SA. Accuracy of routine magnetic resonance imaging in meniscal and ligamentous injuries of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy. Int Orthop. 2009;33:961–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rubin DA, Kettering JM, Towers J, Britton C. MR imaging of knees having isolated and combined ligament injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:1207–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Forster I, Warren-Smith C, Tew M. Is the KT1000 knee ligament arthrometer reliable? Bone Joint J. 1989;71:843–7.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Graham G, Johnson S, Dent C, Fairclough J. Comparison of clinical tests and the KT1000 in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Br J Sports Med. 1991;25:96–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dejour D, Ntagiopoulos PG, Saggin PR, Panisset J-C. The diagnostic value of clinical tests, magnetic resonance imaging, and instrumented laxity in the differentiation of complete versus partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:491–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pereira H, Sevivas N, Pereira R, Monteiro A, Oliveira JM, Reis R, et al. New tools for diagnosis, assessment of surgical outcome and follow-up. In: Hermoso JAH, Monllau JC, editors. Lesiones ligamentosas de la rodilla; 2012. p. 185–97.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tashiro Y, Okazaki K, Miura H, Matsuda S, Yasunaga T, Hashizume M, et al. Quantitative assessment of rotatory instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:909–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Espregueira-Mendes J, Pereira H, Sevivas N, Passos C, Vasconcelos JC, Monteiro A, et al. Assessment of rotatory laxity in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees using magnetic resonance imaging with Porto-knee testing device. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:671–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Espregueira-Mendes J, Andrade R, Leal A, Pereira H, Skaf A, Rodrigues-Gomes S, et al. Global rotation has high sensitivity in ACL lesions within stress MRI. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:2993–3003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAKOS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renato Andrade
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hugo Duarte
    • 4
  • Rogério Pereira
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
  • Claudia Arias
    • 6
    • 7
  • Ricardo Bastos
    • 2
    • 3
    • 8
  • Sérgio Rodrigues-Gomes
    • 2
    • 3
  • Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
    • 9
    • 10
    • 11
  • Rui L. Reis
    • 9
    • 10
    • 11
  • João Espregueira-Mendes
    • 2
    • 3
    • 10
    • 12
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of SportsUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Clínica do Dragão, Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre - FIFA Medical Centre of ExcellencePortoPortugal
  3. 3.Dom Henrique Research CentrePortoPortugal
  4. 4.Faculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal
  5. 5.University Fernando PessoaPortoPortugal
  6. 6.Hospital Edgardo Rebagliati MartinsLimaPeru
  7. 7.International Clinic San BorjaLimaPeru
  8. 8.Fluminense Federal UniversityRio de JaneiroBrazil
  9. 9.3B’s Research Group–Biomaterials, Biodegradables and BiomimeticsUniversity of MinhoMinhoPortugal
  10. 10.Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineBarco/GuimarãesPortugal
  11. 11.ICVS/3B’s–PT Government Associate LaboratoryBraga/GuimarãesPortugal
  12. 12.School of MedicineUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations