A Tool for Massive Cell Annotations in Whole Slide Images
  • Marc AubrevilleEmail author
  • Christof Bertram
  • Robert Klopfleisch
  • Andreas Maier
Conference paper
Part of the Informatik aktuell book series (INFORMAT)


Large-scale image data such as digital whole-slide histology images pose a challenging task at annotation software solutions. Today, a number of good solutions with varying scopes exist. For cell annotation, however, we find that many do not match the prerequisites for fast annotations. Especially in the field of mitosis detection, it is assumed that detection accuracy could significantly benefit from larger annotation databases that are currently however very troublesome to produce. Further, multiple independent (blind) expert labels are a big asset for such databases, yet there is currently no tool for this kind of annotation available. To ease this tedious process of expert annotation and grading, we introduce SlideRunner, an open source annotation and visualization tool for digital histopathology, developed in close cooperation with two pathologists. SlideRunner is capable of setting annotations like object centers (for e.g. cells) as well as object boundaries (e.g. for tumor outlines). It provides single-click annotations as well as a blind mode for multi-annotations, where the expert is directly shown the microscopy image containing the cells that he has not yet rated.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bertram CA, Klopfleisch R. The pathologist 2.0: an update on digital pathology in veterinary medicine. Vet Pathol. 2017 Jun;54(5):756–766.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albarqouni S, Baur C, Achilles F, et al. AggNet - deep learning from crowds for mitosis detection in breast cancer histology images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35(5):1313–1321.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boiesen P, Bendahl PO, Anagnostaki L, et al. Histologic grading in breast cancer: reproducibility between seven pathologic departments. Acta Oncol. 2000;39(1):41– 45.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Batliner A, Steidl S, Hacker C, et al. In: Tales of tuning: prototyping for automatic classification of emotional user states; 2005. p. 489–492.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bengio Y, Louradour J, Collobert R, et al. Curriculum learning. Proc ICML. 2009; p. 41–48.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Chaumont F, Dallongeville S, Chenouard N, et al. Icy: an open bioimage informatics platform for extended reproducible research. Nat Methods. 2012 Jun;9(7):690–696.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carpenter AE, Jones TR, Lamprecht MR, et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 2006;7(10):R100.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marée R, Stévens B, Rollus L, et al. A rich internet application for remote visualization and collaborative annotation of digital slides in histology and cytology. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8(Suppl 1):S26.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernández JA, et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16878.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goode A, Gilbert B, Harkes J, et al. OpenSlide: A vendor-neutral software foundation for digital pathology. J Pathol Inform. 2013;4:27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Aubreville
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christof Bertram
    • 2
  • Robert Klopfleisch
    • 2
  • Andreas Maier
    • 1
  1. 1.Pattern Recognition Lab, Computer SciencesFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenDeutschland
  2. 2.Institute of Veterinary PathologyFreie Universität BerlinBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations