Advertisement

Anatomical Shoulder Arthroplasty: Why It Fails

  • Pascal Gleyze
  • Nikolaos Tzanakakis
  • Constantina Moraiti
Chapter

Abstract

The procedure of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is currently increasing giving excellent results in terms of pain relief and shoulder function. Complications and failures are rare in expert hands, but we can have a high prevalence if the surgeon rarely performs this procedure.

Most of these complications are not the result of specific surgical errors, but rather a sum of pre-, intra-, and postoperative details that, when not addressed, accumulate and may result in problems difficult to solve and, finally, may lead to failure.

Experience is the sum of our mistakes, and the goal of this chapter is to share the key points that lead to success or failure of TSA, starting from selecting the right indication to the postoperative rehabilitation. Based on personal experiences added to a review of the literature, we present these key points and emphasize, at the same time, pitfalls and pearls to achieve a successful procedure.

Keywords

Total shoulder arthroplasty Failure Complications Instability Infection 

References

  1. 1.
    Bohsali KI, Bois AJ, Wirth MA. Complications of shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(3):256–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(10):2279–92.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr. Complications of total shoulder-replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(4):603–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Affonso J, Nicholson GP, Frankle MA, Walch G, Gerber C, Garzon-Muvdi J, McFarland EG. Complications of the reverse prosthesis: prevention and treatment. Instr Course Lect. 2012;61:157–68.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mattei L, Mortera S, Arrigoni C, Castoldi F. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: an update on indications, technique, results and complication rates. Joints. 2015;3(2):72–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chin PY, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Schleck C. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty: are they fewer or different? J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2006;15(1):19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wiater BP, Moravek JE Jr, Wiater JM. The evaluation of the failed shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23(5):745–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walch G, Boileau P. Prosthetic adaptability: a new concept for shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8:443.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Boileau P, Mole D, Adeleine P. The influence of glenohumeral prosthetic mismatch on glenoid radiolucent lines: results of a multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(12):2186–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Westphal T, Woischnik S, Adolf D, Feistner H, Piatek S. Axillary nerve lesions after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures through an extended lateral deltoid-split approach: electrophysiological findings. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26(3):464–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aibinder WR, Schoch B, Schleck C, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Revisions for aseptic glenoid component loosening after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26(3):443–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Padegimas EM, Zmistowski BM, Restrepo C, Abboud JA, Lazarus MD, Ramsey ML, Williams GR, Namdari S. Instability after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: which patients dislocate? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016;45(7):E444–50.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplast. 1999;14(6):756–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, et al. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;304:78–83.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Samilson RL, Watkins MB, Winters DM. Acute suppurative arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956;38-A(6):1313–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Molé D, Wein F, Dézaly C, Valenti P, Sirveaux F. Surgical technique: the anterosuperior approach for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(9):2461–8. Published online 2011 Mar 30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gill TJ, Hawkins RJ. Complications of shoulder surgery: treatment and prevention. New York: Lippincott; 2008. p. 88.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Valenti P, Sirveaux F. Surgical technique: the anterosuperior approach for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(9):2461–8. Published online 2011 Mar 30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scheibel M, Habermeyer P. Subscapularis dysfunction following anterior surgical approaches to the shoulder. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2008;17(4):671–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Katz D, Kany J, Valenti P, Sauzières P, Gleyze P, El Kholti K. New design of a cementless glenoid component in unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective medium-term analysis of 143 cases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23(1):27–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sabesan VJ, Ackerman J, Sharma V, Baker KC, Kurdziel MD, Wiater JM. Glenohumeral mismatch affects micromotion of cemented glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24(5):814–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papadonikolakis A, Neradilek MB, Matsen FA. Failure of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the English-language literature between 2006 and 2012. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(24):2205–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ESSKA 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pascal Gleyze
    • 1
  • Nikolaos Tzanakakis
    • 1
  • Constantina Moraiti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and Sports TraumatologyHôpital Nord Franche ComtéTrévenansFrance

Personalised recommendations