Advertisement

Lehrformen

  • Falk Ochsendorf
  • Monika Sennekamp
  • Thomas Kollewe
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Lehre findet in verschiedenen Formaten statt. In diesem Kapitel werden die Charakteristika, die Vor- und Nachteile, die Strukturierung sowie die konkrete Umsetzung des Unterrichts in den einzelnen Formaten dargestellt. Für Vorlesungen werden Stärken, Schwächen und Optimierungsmögichkeiten besprochen. Für Seminare werden Anregungen zur Teilnehmeraktivierung gegeben. Für den Unterricht am Krankenbett werden erfolgreiche Ablaufschemata vorgestellt. Für die Lehre im klinischen Alltag werden konkrete Umsetzungskonzepte präsentiert (One Minute Teacher, SNAPPS, MiPLAN), inklusive Anregungen zur Vermittlung praktischer Fertigkeiten (Peyton, mentales Training, Simulationen, standardisierte Patienten). Die Ziele naturwissenschaftlicher Praktika werden diskutiert. Das Grundkonzept des problemorientierten Lernens (POL/PBL) sowie der mögliche Einsatz digitaler Medien werden vorgestellt.

Literatur

  1. Barangard H, Afshari P, Abedi P (2016) The effect of the SNAPPS (summarize, narrow, analyze, probe, plan, and select) method versus teacher-centered education on the clinical gynecology skills of midwifery students in Iran. Journal of educational evaluation for health professions 13:41CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes NR (1983) A comparison of alternative techniques of instruction. South African Journal of Psychology 13:6–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrows HS (1993) An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 68:443–51; discussion 451–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bassey M (1968) Learning methods in tertiary education. Nottingham Regional College of Technology. Internal paper, 46fGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett M, Gay SP, Kinston R, McKinley R (2017) Taking on the doctor role in whole-task simulation. The Clinical Teacher 14: 1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berendt B (Hrsg) (2002–2015) Neues Handbuch Hochschullehre; Lehren und Lernen effizient gestalten. Raabe, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhaisare R, Kamble B (2016) Impact of utilisation of uncompleted handouts on power point presentations (PPT) in rural Indian medical institute. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism 4:145–149Google Scholar
  8. Blasberg R, Haage H, Kroemer HK (Hrsg) (2013) Approbationsordnung für Ärzte; Stand zum 1. Januar 2014 unter Einbezug der Änderungsverordnungen von 2012 und 2013: Testfassungen, tabellarische Übersicht, Erläuterungen. MFT, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Bligh DA (2000) Whatʼs the use of lectures? Jossey-Bass Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  10. Boshuizen HPA, Schmidt HG (1992) On the Role of Biomedical Knowledge in Clinical Reasoning by Experts, Intermediates and Novices. Cognitive Science 16:153–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bosse HM, Schultz J-H, Nickel M, Lutz T, Möltner A, Jünger J, Huwendiek S, Nikendei C (2012) The effect of using standardized patients or peer role play on ratings of undergraduate communication training: a randomized controlled trial. Patient education and counseling 87:300–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bosse HM, Nickel M, Huwendiek S, Schultz JH, Nikendei C (2015) Cost-effectiveness of peer role play and standardized patients in undergraduate communication training. BMC medical education 15:183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Broadbent DE (1970) Review lecture. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Vol. 1 175 B:333–350Google Scholar
  14. Brown G, Manogue M (2001) AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 22; Refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers. Medical teacher 23:231–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJ, Feltovich PJ (2007) Scripts and clinical reasoning. Medical education 41:1178–1184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen R, Grierson LE, Norman GR (2015) Evaluating the impact of high- and low-fidelity instruction in the development of auscultation skills. Medical education 49:276–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook DA (2014) How much evidence does it take? A cumulative meta-analysis of outcomes of simulation-based education. Medical education 48:750–760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM (2008) Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 300:1181–1196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hamstra SJ (2011) Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 306:978–988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cook DA, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hatala R (2012) Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Simulation in healthcare: journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 7:308–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Copeland HL, Longworth DL, Hewson MG, Stoller JK (2000) Successful lecturing; A prospective study to validate attributes of the effective medical lecture. Journal of general internal medicine 15:366–371CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Custers EJFM (2010) Long-term retention of basic science knowledge; A review study. Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice 15:109–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Custers EJFM, ten Cate OTJ (2011) Very long-term retention of basic science knowledge in doctors after graduation. Medical education 45:422–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Davidson R, Duerson M, Rathe R, Pauly R, Watson RT (2001) Using standardized patients as teachers: a concurrent controlled trial. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 76:840–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diesen DL, Erhunmwunsee L, Bennett KM, Ben-David K, Yurcisin B, Ceppa EP, Omotosho PA, Perez A, Pryor A (2011) Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices. Journal of surgical education 68:282–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dobkin PL, Laliberté V (2014) Being a mindful clinical teacher; Can mindfulness enhance education in a clinical setting? Medical teacher 36:347–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Eldred-Evans D, Grange P, Cheang A, Yamamoto H, Ayis S, Mulla M, Immenroth M, Sharma D, Reedy G (2013) Using the mind as a simulator: a randomized controlled trial of mental training. Journal of surgical education 70:544–551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Elisabeth C, Christine W-H, Ewa P (2009) Teaching during clinical practice; Strategies and techniques used by preceptors in nursing education. Nurse education today 29:522–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Errichetti A, Boulet JR (2006) Comparing traditional and computer-based training methods for standardized patients. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 81:S91-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Estai M, Bunt S (2016) Best teaching practices in anatomy education. A critical review. Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger: official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft 208:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fabry G (2008) Medizindidaktik; Ein Handbuch für die Praxis. Huber, BernGoogle Scholar
  32. Fletcher KE, Stern DT, White C, Gruppen LD, Oh MS, Cimmino VM (2004) The physical examination of patients with abdominal pain: the long-term effect of adding standardized patients and small-group feedback to a lecture presentation. Teaching and learning in medicine 16:171–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Frenkel MO, Maltese S, Schankin A (2012) Befunde aus EEG-Untersuchungen zum Mentalen Training. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie 19:16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gage NL, Berliner DC (1996) Pädagogische Psychologie. Beltz, PsychologieVerlagsUnion, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  35. Giovanni D de, Roberts T, Norman G (2009) Relative effectiveness of high- versus low-fidelity simulation in learning heart sounds. Medical education 43:661–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gradl-Dietsch G, Lübke C, Horst K, Simon M, Modabber A, Sönmez TT, Münker R, Nebelung S, Knobe M (2016) Peytonʼs four-step approach for teaching complex spinal manipulation techniques – a prospective randomized trial. BMC medical education 16:284CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Griesinger W (1848/1849) Referat über das medicinische Unterrichts- und Prüfungswesen in Würtemberg. August Hirschwald, Berlin, S 149–170Google Scholar
  38. Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA (2014) Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 89:387–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heard JK, Cantrell M, Presher L, Klimberg VS, San Pedro GS, Erwin DO (1995) Using standardized patients to teach breast evaluation to sophomore medical students. Journal of cancer education: the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education 10:191–194Google Scholar
  40. Hendrickx K, Winter B de, Tjalma W, Avonts D, Peeraer G, Wyndaele J-J (2009) Learning intimate examinations with simulated patients: the evaluation of medical studentsʼ performance. Medical teacher 31:e139–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Herbstreit F, Merse S, Schnell R, Noack M, Dirkmann D, Besuch A, Peters J (2017) Impact of standardized patients on the training of medical students to manage emergencies. Medicine 96:e5933CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Hochschulforum Digitalisierung (2015) 20 Thesen zur Digitalisierung der Ho 20 Thesen zur Digitalisierung der Hochschulbildung. Arbeitspapier Nr. 14. Edition Stifterverband Verwaltungsgesellschaft Wirtschaftspflege, EssenGoogle Scholar
  43. Ilgen JS, Sherbino J, Cook DA (2013) Technology-enhanced simulation in emergency medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic emergency medicine: official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 20:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Janicik RW, Fletcher KE (2003) Teaching at the bedside; A new model. Medical teacher 25:127–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jayakumar N (2017) Bedside teaching with unwell patients: Can it ever be appropriate? Medical teacher 39:323–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaplonyi J, Bowles K-A, Nestel D, Kiegaldie D, Maloney S, Haines T, Williams C (2017) Understanding the impact of simulated patients on health care learners' communication skills: a systematic review. Medical educationCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kennedy CC, Cannon EK, Warner DO, Cook DA (2014) Advanced airway management simulation training in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical care medicine 42:169–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kim SH, Lee YH, Yoo HB, Park JH (2012) Job analysis of standardized patient trainer. Korean journal of medical education 24:39–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Klomp HJ, Eberhard J, Hren S, Hedderich J, Schmidt HG (2009) The role of pathophysiological explanations in clinical case representations of dental students and experts. European journal of dental education: official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe 13:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Koens F, Custers EJFM, ten Cate OTJ (2006) Clinical and basic science teachers' opinions about the required depth of biomedical knowledge for medical students. Medical teacher 28:234–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Krautter M, Weyrich P, Schultz J-H, Buss SJ, Maatouk I, Jünger J, Nikendei C (2011) Effects of Peyton's four-step approach on objective performance measures in technical skills training: a controlled trial. Teaching and learning in medicine 23:244–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Krautter M, Dittrich R, Safi A, Krautter J, Maatouk I, Moeltner A, Herzog W, Nikendei C (2015) Peyton's four-step approach: differential effects of single instructional steps on procedural and memory performance - a clarification study. Advances in medical education and practice 6:399–406CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Kroenke K (1991) Handouts; Making the lecture portable. Medical teacher 13:199–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Krüger-Brand HE (2002) E-Learning in der Medizin: vor dem Durchbruch. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 99:A1491–1493Google Scholar
  55. LeBaron S (2004) Can the future of medicine be saved from the success of science? Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 79:661–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lempp HK (2005) Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school; Beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study. Medical education 39:318–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Lisk K, Agur AMR, Woods NN (2016) Exploring cognitive integration of basic science and its effect on diagnostic reasoning in novices. Perspectives on medical education 5:147–153CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Lisk K, Agur AMR, Woods NN (2017) Examining the effect of self-explanation on cognitive integration of basic and clinical sciences in novices. Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice 22:1071–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lorello GR, Cook DA, Johnson RL, Brydges R (2014) Simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British journal of anaesthesia 112:231–245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Luscombe C, Montgomery J (2016) Exploring medical student learning in the large group teaching environment; Examining current practice to inform curricular development. BMC medical education 16:184CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Lycke KH, Grottum P, Stromso HI (2006) Student learning strategies, mental models and learning outcomes in problem-based and traditional curricula in medicine. Medical teacher 28:717–722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Marks LE, Miller GA (1964) The role of semantic and syntactic constraints in the memorisation of English sentences. J Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 3:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Marlow N, Altree M, Babidge W, Field J, Hewett P, Maddern GJ (2014) Laparoscopic skills acquisition: a study of simulation and traditional training. ANZ journal of surgery 84:976–980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. McGee SR, Irby DM (1997) Teaching in the outpatient clinic. Practical tips. Journal of general internal medicine 12, Suppl 2:S34-40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. McKinney J, Cook DA, Wood D, Hatala R (2013) Simulation-based training for cardiac auscultation skills: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of general internal medicine 28:283–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. McQueen W (1994) Improving graduate students performance in cognitive assessment. The saga continues. Professional Psychology Research and Practice 25:283–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mueller PA, Oppenheimer DM (2014) The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological science 25:1159–1168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Mulla M, Sharma D, Moghul M, Kailani O, Dockery J, Ayis S, Grange P (2012) Learning basic laparoscopic skills: a randomized controlled study comparing box trainer, virtual reality simulator, and mental training. Journal of surgical education 69:190–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Münster T, Stosch C, Hindrichs N, Franklin J, Matthes J (2016) Peyton's 4-Steps-Approach in comparison: Medium-term effects on learning external chest compression – a pilot study. GMS journal for medical education 33:Doc60Google Scholar
  70. Nair BR, Coughlan JL, Hensley MJ (1997) Student and patient perspectives on bedside teaching. Medical education 31:341–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Nair BR, Coughlan JL, Hensley MJ (1998) Impediments to bed-side teaching. Medical education 32:159–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Neher JO, Gordon KC, Meyer B, Stevens N (1992) A five-step “microskills” model of clinical teaching. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 5:419–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Nikendei C, Huber J, Stiepak J, Huhn D, Lauter J, Herzog W, Jünger J, Krautter M (2014) Modification of Peyton's four-step approach for small group teaching – a descriptive study. BMC medical education 14:68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Norman G, Dore K, Grierson L (2012) The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Medical education 46:636–647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Norman GR, Schmidt HG (1992) The psychological basis of problem-based learning; A review of the evidence. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 67:557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Park JH, Son JY, Kim S, May W (2011) Effect of feedback from standardized patients on medical students' performance and perceptions of the neurological examination. Medical teacher 33:1005–1010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Patel VL, Groen GJ, Norman GR (1991) Effects of conventional and problem-based medical curricula on problem solving. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 66:380–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Plaksin J, Nicholson J, Kundrod S, Zabar S, Kalet A, Altshuler L (2016) The Benefits and Risks of Being a Standardized Patient: A Narrative Review of the Literature. The patient 9:15–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Pottier P, Dejoie T, Hardouin JB, Le Loupp AG, Planchon B, Bonnaud A, Leblanc VR (2013) Effect of stress on clinical reasoning during simulated ambulatory consultations. Medical teacher 35:472–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Prabhu V, Sahoo S, Soe HHK (2015) Effectiveness of skeleton handouts during ophthalmology theory lectures for undergraduate medical students. International journal of applied & basic medical research 5:S29–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ramani S (2003) Twelve tips to improve bedside teaching. Medical teacher 25:112–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Ramani S, Orlander JD (2013) Human dimensions in bedside teaching; Focus group discussions of teachers and learners. Teaching and learning in medicine 25:312–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Rikers, Schmidt, Boshuizen (2000) Knowledge Encapsulation and the Intermediate Effect. Contemporary educational psychology 25:150–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Romero P, Gu Nther P, Kowalewski K-F, Friedrich M, Schmidt MW, Trent SM, La Garza JR de, Mu Ller-Stich BP, Nickel F (2017) Halsted's “See One, Do One, and Teach One” versus Peyton's Four-Step Approach: A Randomized Trial for Training of Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying. Journal of surgical education 17 (article in press). DOI  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.025
  85. Russell IJ, Caris TN, Harris GD, Hendricson WD (1983) Effects of three types of lecture notes on medical student achievement. Journal of medical education 58:627–636PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Schecker H, Neumann K, Theyßen H, Eickhorst B, Dickmann M (2016) Stufen experimenteller Kompetenz. ZfDN 22:197–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ (2003) Introducing the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator: toward a revolution in surgical education. Surgical technology international 11:32–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Seago BL, Ketchum JM, Willett RM (2012) Pelvic examination skills training with genital teaching associates and a pelvic simulator: does sequence matter? Simulation in healthcare: journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 7:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Seki M, Otaki J, Breugelmans R, Komoda T, Nagata-Kobayashi S, Akaishi Y, Hiramoto J, Ohno I, Harada Y, Hirayama Y, Izumi M (2016) How do case presentation teaching methods affect learning outcomes? – SNAPPS and the One-Minute preceptor. BMC medical education 16:12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Smith JR, Lane IF (2015) Making the Most of Five Minutes; The Clinical Teaching Moment. Journal of veterinary medical education 42:271–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Stickrath C, Aagaard E, Anderson M (2013) MiPLAN; A learner-centered model for bedside teaching in today's academic medical centers. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 88:322–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Theyssen H (2005) Didaktische Rekonstruktion eines Physikpraktikums für Medizinstudier ende. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 11:57–72Google Scholar
  93. Vannatta JB, Smith KR, Crandall S, Fischer PC, Williams K (1996) Comparison of standardized patients and faculty in teaching medical interviewing. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 71:1360–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vaona A, Banzi R, Kwag KH, Rigon G, Cereda D, Pecoraro V, Tramacere I, Moja L. (2018) E-learning for health professionals.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 21;1:CD011736. DOI: 10.1002/14651858Google Scholar
  95. Weatherall DJ (2006) Science in the undergraduate curriculum during the 20th century. Medical education 40:195–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Weitzel KW, Walters EA, Taylor J (2012) Teaching clinical problem solving; A preceptor's guide. American journal of health-system pharmacy: AJHP: official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 69:1588–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Widulle W (2009) Handlungsorientiert Lernen im Studium. Arbeitsbuch für soziale und pädagogische Berufe. VS, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Winteler A (2013) Professionell lehren und lernen. Ein Praxisbuch. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (WBG), DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  99. Wolpaw T, Papp KK, Bordage G (2009) Using SNAPPS to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties. A randomized comparison group trial. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 84:517–524Google Scholar
  100. Wolpaw TM, Wolpaw DR, Papp KK (2003) SNAPPS; A learner-centered model for outpatient education. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 78:893–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wong SYS, Cheung AKY, Lee A, Cheung N, Leung A, Wong W, Chan K (2007) Improving general practitioners' interviewing skills in managing patients with depression and anxiety: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Medical teacher 29:e175–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Wongkietkachorn A, Prakoonsuksapan J, Wangsaturaka D (2014) What happens when teachers do not give students handouts? Medical teacher 36:789–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Woods NN (2007) Science is fundamental; The role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. Medical education 41:1173–1177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR (2005) The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis; Creating coherence among signs and symptoms. Medical education 39:107–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Wragg EC (2003) How can we determine the relevance of basic sciences learning objectives to clinical practice? Medical education 37:948–949CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Wündrich M, Schwartz C, Feige B, Lemper D, Nissen C, Voderholzer U (2017) Empathy training in medical students – a randomized controlled trial. Medical teacher 39:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adressen von Einrichtungen mit Zusatzinformationen zum Einsatz digitaler Medien

  1. https://www.e-teaching.org/projekt/politik/foerderphasen (E-Learning Förderung in Deutschland) (Zuletzt gesehen: 27. August 2017)
  2. https://blog.llz.uni-halle.de/ (Universität Halle)
  3. https://www.mmkh.de/ (Multimedia Konto Hamburg)

Auswahl an Zeitschriften mit dem Thema „Neue Medien“

  1. Educause Review – http://er.educause.edu/ero
  2. First Monday – http://firstmonday.org/index
  3. Hamburger E-Learning Magazin (2008–2015) – https://www.uni-hamburg.de/elearning/beispiele/helm/archiv.html
  4. Horizon Report (Deutsche Übersetzung) – https://www.mmkh.de/newsmaterial/materialdownloads.html
  5. Synergie Fachmagazin für Digitalisierung in der Lehre – https://www.synergie.uni-hamburg.de/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Falk Ochsendorf
    • 1
  • Monika Sennekamp
    • 2
  • Thomas Kollewe
    • 3
  1. 1.UniversitätsklinikumKlinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und AllergologieFrankfurt am MainDeutschland
  2. 2.Goethe-UniversitätFachbereich Medizin, Institut für AllgemeinmedizinFrankfurt am MainDeutschland
  3. 3.Goethe-UniversitätFachbereich Medizin, Frankf. Arbeitsstelle für MedizindidaktikFrankfurt am MainDeutschland

Personalised recommendations