Advertisement

Vertical Sculpted Pillar Reduction Mammoplasty

  • Cindy Wu
  • James C. GrottingEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The vertical sculpted pillar technique evolved from incorporating different maneuvers that collectively result in a stable breast cone fashioned from carefully tailored breast tissue. The key concept is to visualize and shape the volume of the breast tissue that one leaves behind, not the tissue that is taken away. To determine the best pedicle, a simple preoperative maneuver is performed. If the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) easily glides upward to its new position, then the superior pedicle popularized by Lassus [1, 2] via a vertical approach is used. Otherwise, if the NAC cannot be manipulated in this manner, then we convert to the superomedial pedicle popularized by Hall-Findlay [3, 4]. The other rule of thumb is that if the NAC is below the “the mosque dome” portion of the keyhole, then we begin to think in terms of a superomedial pedicle as opposed to a strictly vertical one. The sculpting of the medial and lateral pillars is modified from the technique of Chiari [5]. Other unique features of this technique include the shaping sutures in the superior pole of the breast, originally described by Marchac [6, 7], and the lateral shaping suture, described in an unpublished communication with Alex de Souza, a Brazilian plastic surgeon. Lastly, the reflected inframammary fold (the “A-point” of Pitanguy) becomes the superior-most point of attachment of the new areola, not the nipple.

Keywords

Reduction mammoplasty Vertical reduction 

Supplementary material

Video 16.1

Video 16.2

Video 16.3

References

  1. 1.
    Lassus C. A technique for breast reduction. Int Surg. 1970;53:69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lassus C. The Lassus vertical technique. Aesth Surg J. 2011;31(8):897–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    LeJour M. Vertical mammoplasty: update and appraisal of late results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:771–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hall-Findlay EJ. A simplified vertical reduction mammoplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:748–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hall-Findlay EJ. Pedicles in vertical breast reduction and mastopexy. Clin Plast Surg. 2002;29:379–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chiari A Jr. The L short-scar mammoplasty: a new approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marchac D, de Olarte G. Reduction mammoplasty and correction of ptosis with a short inframammary scar. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69(1):45–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marchac D, Sagher U. Mammaplasty with a short horizontal scar. Evaluation and results after 9 years. Clin Plast Surg. 1988 Oct;15(4):627–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wall S Jr. SAFE circumferential liposuction with abdominoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2010;37(3):485–501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Division of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryThe University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Clinical Professor of Plastic Surgery, The University of Alabama at BirminghamThe University of Wisconsin, MadisonBirminghamUSA
  3. 3.Private PracticeGrotting and Cohn Plastic SurgeryBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations