Dopplersonographie in der Reproduktionsmedizin



Diese Kapitel erläutert die Dopplersonographie in der Reproduktionsmedizin. Zur Abklärung der Ursachen eines unerfüllten Kinderwunsches stellt die Dopplersonographie eine wichtige Komponente in der Diagnostik dar. Mit ihrer Hilfe können Tubenfaktor sowie die ovarielle und uterine Perfusion untersucht werden. Die Dopplersonographie dient darüber hinaus zur Optimierung der assistierten Reproduktion.


  1. Aytoz A, Ubaldi F, Tournaye H, Zolst P, Van Steirtghem A, Devroey P (1997) The predictive value of uterine artery blood flow measurements for uterine receptivity in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection program. Fertil Steril 68: 935–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Battaglia C, Larocca E, Lanzani A, Valentini M, Ganazzani AR (1990) Doppler ultrasound studies of the uterine arteries in spontaneous and IVF stimulated cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol 4: 245–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloechle M, Schreiner TH, Küchler I, Schürenkämper P, Lisse K (1997) Colour Doppler assessment of ascendent uterine artery perfusion in an in-vitro ferilization-embryo transfer programme after pituitary desensation and ovarian stimulation with human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone. Hum Reprod 12: 1772–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourne TH (1991)Transvaginal color Doppler in gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol 1: 309–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourne TH, Hagström HG, Hahlin M, Josefsson B, Granberg S, Hellberg P et al. (1996) Ultrasound studies of vascular and morphologic changes in the human corpus luteum during the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 65: 753–758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cacciatore B, Simberg N, Fusaro P, Tiitinen A (1996) Transvaginal Doppler study of uterine artery blood flow in in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 66: 130–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chien LW, Lee WS, Tzeng CR (2004) Assessment of changes in utero-ovarian arterial impedance during the peri-implantation period by Doppler sonography in women undergoing assisted reproduction. Ultrasound Obstet Gyncecol 23: 496–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornet D, Giacomini P, Pereira-Coelho A, Salat-Baroux J (1986) Etude échographique de l’épaisseur de l’endomètre au cours des cycles spontanés et stimulés: applications à la fécondation in vitro. J Gynecol Obstet. Biol Reprod 15:621–625Google Scholar
  9. Coulam CB, Goodman C, Rinehart JS (1999) Colour Doppler indices of follicular blood flow as predictors of pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 14: 1979–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dallenbach CH, Sterzik K, Dallenbach-Hellweg G (1987) Histologische Endometriumbefunde bei Patientinnen am Tage eines geplanten Embryo-Transfers. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 47: 623–629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. DeZiegler D, Bessis R, Frydman R (1991) Vascular resistance of uterine arteries: physiological effects of estradiol and progesterone. Fertil Steril 55: 775–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engmann L, Sladkevicius P, Agrawal R, Bekir JS, Campbell S, Tan SL (1999) Value of ovarian stromal blood flow velocity measurement after pituitary suppression in the prediction of ovarian responsiveness and outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 71: 22–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Favre RK, Bettahar G, Grange J, Ohl E, Arbogast L et al. (1993) Predictive value of transvaginal uterine Doppler assessment in an in vitro fertilization program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3: 350–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Feichtinger W, Putz M, Kemeter P (1988) Transvaginale Doppler-Sonographie zur Blutflussmessung im kleinen Becken. Ultraschall Med 9 (1): 30–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fleischer AC (1991) Ultrasound imaging - 2000: assessment of utero-ovarian blood flow with transvaginal color Doppler sonography, potential clinical applications in infertility. Fertil Steril 55: 684–691CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Geber S, Vaintraub MT, Rotschild G, Scampaio M (2012): Doppler of the uterine arteries combined with endometrial thickness correlate well with the degree of pituitary suppression in women treated with long-acting GnRH agonists. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287:369–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Goswamy RK, Steptoe PC (1988) Doppler ultrasound studies of the uterine artery in spontaneous ovarian cycles. Hum Reprod 3: 721–726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Goswamy RK, Williams G, Steptoe PC (1988) Decreased uterine perfusion – a cause of infertility. Hum Reprod 3: 955–959CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grab D (1994) Zur Rezeptivität des Endometriums: Stellenwert der Sonographie und Dopplersonographie im unbehandelten Menstruationszyklus und nach hormoneller Stimulation. Habilitationsschrift, UlmGoogle Scholar
  20. Grab D, Sasse V, Terinde R, Sterzik K (1989) Der vaskuläre Widerstand der Aa. uterinae als prognostisches Kriterium für eine erfolgreiche Implantation? Fertilität 5: 61–64Google Scholar
  21. Grab D, Sterzik K (2000) Optimierung der assistierten Reproduktion durch Einsatz der Farbdopplersonographie. In: Schmidt W, Kurjak A (Hrsg) Farbdopplersonographie in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  22. Grab D, Stoijc S, Königbauer U, Sterzik K (1992) Uterine Blutströmungsprofile im Spontanzyklus von Sterilitätspatientinnen. Fertilität 8: 1–4Google Scholar
  23. Hansen V, Schifter S, Allen J, Maigaard S, Forman A (1988) Effects of human calcitonin gene-related peptides and substance P on human intracervical arteries. Gynecol Obstet Invest 25: 258–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hünecke B, Kleinkauf-Houcken A, Lindner C, Braendle W (2000) Überprüfung der Tubendurchgängigkeit mittels gepulster und farbcodierter Duplexdopplersonographie. In: Schmidt W, Kurjak A (Hrsg) Farbdopplersonographie in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  25. Isaacs JD, Wells DS, Williams DB, Odem RR, Gast MJ, Strickler RC (1996) Endometrial thickness is a valid monitoring parameter in cycles of ovulation induction with menotropins alone. Fertil Steril 65: 262–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurjak A, Kupesic-Urek S, Schulman H, Zalud I (1991) Transvaginal color flow Doppler in the assessment of ovarian and uterine blood flow in infertile women. Fertil Steril 56: 870–873CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Karande VC (2003) Managing and predicting low response to standard in vitro fertilization therapy. A review of the options. Treat Endrocrinol 2: 257–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lok IH, Yip SK, Cheung LP, Yin Leung PH, Haines CP (2004) Adjuvant low-dose aspirin therapy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 81: 556–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Long MG, Boultbee JE, Hanson ME, Begent RHJ (1989) Doppler time velocity waveform studies of the uterine artery and uterus. Br J Obstet. Gynaecol 96: 588–593CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. McParland P, Pearce JM (1990) Doppler studies in pregnancy. Rec Adv Obstet. Gynaecol 16: 43–73Google Scholar
  31. Merce LT, Gomez B, Engels V, Bau S, Bajo JM (2005) Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of ovarian volume, antral follicle count, and vascularity indices obtained with transvaginal 3-dimensional ultrasonography, power Doppler angiography, and the virtual organ computer-aided analysis imaging programm. J Ultrasound Med 24: 1279–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mo LYL, Bascom PAJ, Ritchie K, McCowan LME (1988) A transmission line modelling approach to the interpretation of uterine Doppler waveforms. Ultrasound Med Biol 14: 365–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ng EHY, Tang, OS, Chan CCW, Ho PC (2005) Ovarian stromal blood flow in prediction of ovarian during in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod;20: 3147–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ottesen B, Gerstenberg T, Ulrichsen H, Manthorpe T, Fahrenkrug J, Wagner G (1983) Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) increases vaginal blood flow and inhibits uterine smooth muscle activity in women. Eur J Clin Invest 13: 321–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Owman C, Alm P, Sjöberg NO (1983) Pelvic autonomic ganglia: structure, transmitters, function and steroid influence. In: Elfvin LG (ed) Autonomic Ganglia. Wiley, New York, pp 125–143Google Scholar
  36. Owman C, Stjernquist M, Helm G, Kannisto P, Sjöberg NO, Sundler F (1986) Comparative histochemical distribution of nerve fibres storing noradrenaline and neuropeptide Y (NPY) in human ovary, fallopian tube, and uterus. Med Biol 64: 57–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Oyesanya OA, Parsons JH, Collins WP, Campbell S (1996) Prediction of oocyte recovery rate by transvaginal ultrasonography and color Doppler imaging before human chorionic gonadotropin administration in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 65: 806–809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Lobo RA (1990) Embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: importance of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 53: 870–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Kendall NR, Johnson IR (2004) The interobserver reliability of three-dimensional power Doppler data aquisition within the female pelvis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23: 501–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rubinstein M, Marazzi A, de Fried EP (1999) Low-dose aspirin treatment improves ovarian responsiveness, uterine and ovarian blood flow velocity, implantation, and pregnancy rates in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled assay. Fertil Steril 71: 825–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Salle B, Bied-Damron V, Benchaib M, Desperes S, Gaucherand P, Rudigoz RC (1998) Preliminary report of an ultrasonography and colour Doppler uterine score to predict uterine receptivity in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod 13: 1669–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schild RL, Holthaus S, d’Alquen J, Fimmers R, Dorn C, ver der Ven H, Hansmann M (2000) Quantitative assessment of subendometrial blood flow by three-dimensional-ultrasound is an important predictive factor of implantation in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod 15: 89–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schild RL, Knobloch C, Dorn C, Fimmers R, van der Ven H, Hansmann M (2001) Endometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and artery blood flow. Fertil Steril 75:361–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Scholtes MCW, Wladimiroff JW, van Rjien HJM, Hop WCJ (1989) Uterine and ovarian flow velocity waveforms in the normal menstrual cycle: a transvaginal Doppler study. Fertil Steril 52: 981–985CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Shresta SM, Costello MF, Sjoblom P, McNally G, Bennett M, Steigrad SJ, Hughes GJ (2006) Power Doppler ultrasound assessment of follicular vascularity in the early follicular phase and its relationship with outcome of in vitro fertilization. J Ass Reprod Gen 23: 161–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spernol R, Hecher K, Schwarzgruber J, Szalay S (1993) Doppler-Flow-Messungen in der A. uterina: Ein Prognosefaktor für den Erfolg bei der Behandlung durch IVF? Ultraschall in Med 14: 175–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steer CV, Campbell S, Pampiglione JS, Kingsland CR et al. (1990) Transvaginal colour flow imaging of the uterine arteries during the ovarian and menstrual cycles. Hum Reprod 5: 391–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Steer CV, Campbell S, Tan et al. (1992) The use of transvaginal color flow imaging after in vitro fertilization to identify optimum uterine conditions before embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 57: 372–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sterzik K, Dallenbach CH, Schneider V, Sasse V, Dallenbach-Hellweg G (1988) In vitro fertilization: the degree of endometrial insufficiency varies with the type of ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 50: 457–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sterzik K, Grab D, Sasse V, Hütter W, Rosenbusch B, Terinde R (1989) Doppler sonographic findings and their correlation with implantation in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steri. 52: 825–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sterzik K, Grab D, Schneider V, Strehler EJ, Gagsteiger F, Rosenbusch BE (1997) Lack of correlation between ultrasonography and histologic staging of the endometrium in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients. Ultrasound Med Biol 23: 165–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Strohmer H, Herczeg C, Plöckinger B, Kemeter P, Feichtinger W (1991) Prognostic appraisal of success and failure in an in vitro fertilization program by transvaginal Doppler ultrasound at the time of ovulation induction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1: 235–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor KJW, Burns PN, Wells PNT, Conway DI, Hull MGR (1985) Ultrasound doppler flow studies of the ovarian and uterine arteries. Br J Obstet Gynecol 92: 240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tekay A, Martikainen H, Jouppila P (1995) Doppler parameters of the ovarian and uterine blood circulation in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 6: 50–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tenmoku S, Ottesen B, O’Hare MMT, Sheikh S et al. (1988) Interaction of NPY and VIP in regulation of myometrial blood flow and mechanical activity. Peptides 9: 269–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Traurig H, Papka RE (1992) Autonomic efferent and visceral sensory innervation of the female reproductive system: special reference to the functional roles of nerves in reproductive organs. In: Maggi CA (ed) Autonomic Nervous System, Vol. 6: Nervous Control of the urogenital system. Harwood Academic Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Vlaisavljevi V, Reljic M, Gavri Lovrec V, Zazula D, Sergent N (2003) Measurement of perifollicular blood flow of the dominant preovulatory follicle using three-dimensional power Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22: 520–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vural F, Vural B, Doger E, Cakiroglu Y, Cekmen M (2016) Perifollicular blood flow and its relationship with endometrial vascularity, follicular fluid EG-VEGF, IGF-1, and inhibin-a levels and IVF outcomes. J Asssist Reprod Genet 33:1355–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wakeman S, Benny P (2009) Is it possible to predict a fertile cycle? Uteroovarian blood flow parameters in conception versus nonconception cycles. Fertil Steril Jun;91(6): 2726–31. Epub 2008 Jul 30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wentz A (1980) Endometrial biopsy in the evaluation of infertility. Fertil Steril 33: 121–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Zaidi J, Barber J, Kyei-Mensah A, Bekir J, Campbell S, Tan SL (1996) Relationship of ovarian stromal blood flow at the baseline ultrasound scan to subsequent follicular resonse in an In Vitro Fertilisation programm. Obstet Gynecol 88: 779–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang T, Yaqiong H, Y Wang, Zhu Q, Yang J, Zhao X, Sun Y (2016): The role of three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound for the assessment of endometrial receptivity during in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 203:66–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Grab
    • 1
  1. 1.Frauenklinik Klinikum HarlachingMünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations