Advertisement

Dopplersonographie am Termin und bei Übertragung

  • C. S. von Kaisenberg
  • K. T. M. Schneider
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel werden die Dopplersonographie und die fetalen Risiken am Termin sowie bei Übertragung erläutert. Dazu finden die physiologischen und pathophysiologischen Veränderungen sowie der Termineffekt Erwähnung. Die Besonderheiten der dopplersonographischen Untersuchung werden am Termin, sub partu und nach dem Termin dargestellt. Das geburtshilfliche Management wird um den Termin und bei Übertragung erläutert.

Literatur

  1. Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP (2006) Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, 4th Issue. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Anteby EY, Tadmor O, Revel A, Yagel S (1994) Post-term pregnancies with normal cardiotocographs and amniotic fluid columns: the role of Doppler evaluation in predicting perinatal outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 54(2): 93–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bricker L, Neilson JP (2006) Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks gestation) The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, 4th Issue. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown VA, Sawers RS, Parsons RJ, Duncan SL, Cooke ID (1982) The value of antenatal cardiotocography in the management of high-risk pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89(9): 716–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Antonio F, Patel D, Chandrasekharan N, Thilaganathan B, Bhide A (2013) Role of cerebroplacental ratio for fetal assessment in prolonged pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 42(2):196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Devine PA, Bracero LA, Lysikiewicz A, Evans R, Womack S, Byrne DW (1994) Middle cerebral to umbilical artery Doppler ratio in post-date pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 84 (5): 856–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dubiel M, Gudmundsson S, Gunnarsson G, Marsal K (1997) Middle cerebral artery velocimetry as a predictor of hypoxemia in fetuses with increased resistance to blood flow in the umbilical artery. Early Hum Dev 47(2):177–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farrell T, Chien PF, Gordon A. (1999) Intrapartum umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 106(8): 783–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer RL, Kuhlman KA, Depp R, Wapner RJ (1991) Doppler evaluation of umbilical and uterine-arcuate arteries in the postdates pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 78 (3 Pt 1): 363–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Flynn AM, Kelly J, Mansfield H, Needham P, O’Conor M, Viegas O (1982) A randomized controlled trial of non-stress antepartum cardiotocography. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89(6): 427–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gnirs J, Schneider KTM, Möhrling D, Wilhelm O, Graeff H (1993) Dopplersonographie, Kineto-Kardiotokographie und fetale Stimulationstests bei Hochrisikoschwangerschaften. Gynäkol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 33 (1):252–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gnirs J, Schneider KTM (1996) Diagnostik der fetalen Bewegungsaktivität, fetaler Stimulationstests und der Komplexitätsanalyse des fetalen EKG’s als Ergänzung der intrapartalen CTG-Überwachung. Gynäkologe 29: 22–27Google Scholar
  13. Hilder L, Costeloe K, Thilaganathan B (1998) Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105(2): 169–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kidd LC, Patel NB, Smith R (1985) Non-stress antenatal cardiotocography – a prospective blind study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92(11): 1152–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lam H, Leung WC, Lee CP, Lao TT (2005a) The use of fetal Doppler cerebroplacental blood flow and amniotic fluid volume measurement in the surveillance of postdated pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84(9): 844–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lam H, Leung WC, Lee CP, Lao TT (2005b) Relationship between cerebroplacental Doppler ratio and birth weight in postdates pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 25(3):265–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lumley J, Lester A, Anderson I, Renou P, Wood C (1983) A randomized trial of weekly cardiotocography in high-risk obstetric patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90 (11): 1018–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neilson JP, Alfirevic Z (2006) Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, 4th Issue. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Olofsson P, Saldeen P, Marsal K (1996) Fetal and uteroplacental circulatory changes in pregnancies proceeding beyond 43 weeks. Early Hum Dev 46 (1-2):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olofsson P, Saldeen P, Marsal K (1997) Association between a low umbilical artery pulsatility index and fetal distress in labor in very prolonged pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 73 (1): 23–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rightmire DA, Campbell S (1987) Fetal and maternal Doppler blood flow parameters in postterm pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 69 (6): 891–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sairam S, Costeloe K, Thilaganathan B (2002) Prospective risk of stillbirth in multiple-gestation pregnancies: a population-based analysis. Obstet Gynecol 100 (4): 638–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Hofmeyr GJ (2006) Transcutaneous electrostimulation for suspected placental insufficiency (diagnosed by Doppler studies). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, 4th Issue. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Schaffer H, Steiner H, Brunner W, Staudach A (1999) Dopplersonographie um den Geburtstermin und bei Überschreitung. Arch Gynecol Obstet 263, Suppl 2: 113–116Google Scholar
  25. Schneider KTM, Gnirs J, Wilhelm O, Graeff H (1994) Doppler, fetale Skalpblutanalyse und subpartales CTG. Arch Gynecol Obstet Vol. 255: 30–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schneider KTM, Huber A, Schelling M, Gnirs J (1996a) Klinischer Stellenwert einer dopplersonographisch festgestellten Sauerstoffsparschaltung des Feten. In: Feldmann UW (Hrsg) Kongressband. H.U.F. Verlag Mülheim (Ruhr), S 4‒5Google Scholar
  27. Schneider KTM, Gnirs J (1996b) Stellenwert der Dopplersonographie sub partu. Gynäkologe 29: 45–51Google Scholar
  28. Selam B, Koksal R, Ozcan T (2000) Fetal arterial and venous Doppler parameters in the interpretation of oligohydramnios in postterm pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15(5): 403–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sütterlin MW, Seelbach-Gobel B, Oehler MK, Heupel M, Dietl J (1999) Doppler ultrasonographic evidence of intrapartum brain-sparing effect in fetuses with low oxygen saturation according to pulse oximetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181 (1): 216–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tan KH, Smyth R (2006) Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation for facilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, 4th Issue. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Urban R, Lemancewicz A, Urban J, Alifier M, Kretowska M (2000) The Doppler cerebroplacental ratios and perinatal outcome in post-term pregnancy. Ginekol Pol 71 (4): 317–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Vankayalapati P, Sethna F, Roberts N, Ngeh N, Thilaganathan B, Bhide A (2008) Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: prediction of spontaneous onset of labor and successful vaginal delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 31(3):328–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Veille JC, Penry M, Mueller-Heubach E (1993) Fetal renal pulsed Doppler waveform in prolonged pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169 (4): 882–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vetter K, Favre Y, Suter T, Huch R, Huch A (1989) Doppler ‒ ultrasonographische Messung spezifischer Veränderungen der fetalen Zirkulation während der letzten 4 Schwangerschaftswochen vor der Geburt. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 193(5): 215‒8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Barnhard Y, Bar-Hava I, Divon MY (1996) Doppler study of the fetal cardiac function in prolonged pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 88(2): 200–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zimmermann P, Alback T, Koskinen J, Vaalamo P, Tuimala R, Ranta T (1995) Doppler flow velocimetry of the umbilical artery, uteroplacental arteries and fetal middle cerebral artery in prolonged pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5(3): 189–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. S. von Kaisenberg
    • 1
  • K. T. M. Schneider
    • 2
  1. 1.Bereichsleiter Geburtshilfe und PränatalmedizinKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin Medizinische Hochschule HannoverHannoverDeutschland
  2. 2.emerit. Leiter der Abteilung fur Perinatalmedizin der TU MunchenMünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations