Advertisement

Methodik

  • Franz J. Neyer
  • Jens B. Asendorpf
  • Jens B. Asendorpf
Chapter
Part of the Springer-Lehrbuch book series (SLB)

Zusammenfassung

Anwendungen der empirischen Persönlichkeitspsychologie in beruflicher Praxis und Wissenschaft setzen voraus, dass die Persönlichkeitsvariation, d. h. Persönlichkeitsunterschiede in einer oder mehreren Persönlichkeitseigenschaften, empirisch beschrieben wird. Dazu müssen Personen nach ihrer Persönlichkeit klassifiziert oder ihre Persönlichkeitseigenschaften gemessen werden. In diesem Kapitel wird zunächst eine Übersicht über Methoden gegeben, die das leisten. Anschließend werden zwei anspruchsvollere Methoden der empirischen Persönlichkeitsforschung skizziert, die zunehmend Verwendung finden: Mehrebenenmodelle und Kreuzkorrelationsdesigns. Wie auch bei der Darstellung von Faktoren- und Clusteranalysen werden nur Grundprinzipien anhand konkreter Beispiele geschildert, um Ergebnisse, die mithilfe dieser Methoden gewonnen werden, interpretieren zu können.

Literatur

  1. Achenbach, T.M., McConaughy, S.H. & Howell, C.T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of crossinformant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232.Google Scholar
  2. Allik, J., Realo, A., Mottus, R., Borkenau, P, Kuppens, P. & Hrebickova, M. (2010). How people see others is different from how people see themselves: A replicable pattern across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 870–882.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Allport, G.W. & Odbert, H.S. (1936). Trait names: A psycholexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, 1 (Whole No. 211).Google Scholar
  4. Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F. & John, O.P. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality, 4, 89–118.Google Scholar
  5. Anusic, I., Schimmack, U., Pinkus, R.T. & Lockwood, P. (2009). The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: The halo-alpha-beta model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1142–1156.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Asendorpf, J.B. (1989b). Soziale Gehemmtheit und ihre Entwicklung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Asendorpf, J. (1991a). Die differentielle Sichtweise in der Psychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  8. Asendorpf, J.B. (1991b). Development of inhibited children’s coping with unfamiliarity. Child Development, 62, 1460–1474.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Asendorpf, J.B., Banse, R. & Mücke, D. (2002a). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380–393.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Asendorpf, J.B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F. & van Aken, M.A.G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15, 169–198.Google Scholar
  11. Asendorpf, J.B., Caspi, A. & Hofstee, W.B.K. (2002b). The puzzle of personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16 (Special Issue S1).Google Scholar
  12. Asendorpf, J.B., Denissen, J.J.A. & van Aken, M.A.G. (2008). Inhibited and aggressive preschool children at 23 years of age: Personality and social transitions into adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 44, 997–1011.Google Scholar
  13. Asendorpf, J.B. & Ostendorf, F. (1998). Is self-enhancement healthy? Conceptual, psychometric, and empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 955–966.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Asendorpf, J.B. & Scherer, K.R. (1983). The discrepant repressor: Differentiation between low anxiety, high anxiety, and repression of anxiety by autonomic-facial-verbal patterns of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1334–1346.Google Scholar
  15. Asendorpf, J.B. & van Aken, M.A.G. (1993). Deutsche Versionen der Selbstkonzeptskalen von Harter. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 64–86.Google Scholar
  16. Asendorpf, J.B. & van Aken, M.A.G. (1999). Resilient, overcontrolled and undercontrolled personality prototypes in childhood: Replicability, predictive power, and the trait/type issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 815–832.Google Scholar
  17. Asendorpf, J.B. & van Aken, M.A.G. (2003a). Validity of Big Five personality judgments in childhood: A 9-year longitudinal study. European Journal of Personality, 17, 1–17.Google Scholar
  18. Asendorpf, J.B. & van Aken, M.A.G. (2003b). Personality – relationship transaction in adolescence: Core versus surface personality characteristics. Journal of Personality, 71, 629–666.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Asendorpf, J.B. & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531–1544.Google Scholar
  20. Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R.E., Di Blas, L., … & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Bagby, R.M., Costa, P.T.Jr,., Widiger, T.A., Ryder, A.G. & Marshall, M. (2005). DSM-IV personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: A multi-method examination of domain- and facet-level predictions. European Journal of Personality, 19, 249–372.Google Scholar
  22. Benet, V. & Waller, N.G. (1995). The Big Seven factor model of personality description: Evidence for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 701–718.Google Scholar
  23. Biesanz, J.C., Human, L.J., Paquin, A.C., Chan, M., Parisotto, K. L., Sarracino, J. & Gillis, R.L. (2011). Do we know when our impressions of others are valid? Evidence for realistic accuracy awareness in first impressions of personality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 452–459.Google Scholar
  24. Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  25. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Block, J.H. & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In W.A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Bolger, N. & Zuckerman, A. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 890–902.Google Scholar
  28. Borkenau, P. & Liebler, A. (1993). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 546–553.Google Scholar
  29. Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F.M. & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614.Google Scholar
  30. Borkenau, P. & Ostendorf, F. (2008). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI) (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  31. Brigham,J.C., Maass, A., Snyder, L.D. & Spaulding, K. (1982). Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 673–681.Google Scholar
  32. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Buck, R. (1980). Nonverbal behavior and the theory of emotion: The facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 811–824.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Buse, L. & Pawlik, K. (1991). Zur State-Trait-Charakteristik verschiedener Meßvariablen der psychophysiologischen Aktivierung, der kognitiven Leistung und der Stimmung in Alltagssituationen. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 38, 521–538.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Cacioppo, J.T. Uchino, B.N., Crites, S.L., Snydersmith, M.A., Smith, G., Berntson, G.G. & Lang, P.J. (1992). Relationship between facial expressiveness and sympathetic activation in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 110–128.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Campbell, D.T. & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.Google Scholar
  37. Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T.E., Mill, J., Martin, J., Craig, I.W., Taylor, A. & Poulton, R. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851–54.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Cattell, R.B. (1946). The description and measurement of personality. Yonkers, NY: World Book.Google Scholar
  39. Chittaranjan, G., Blom, J. & Gatica-Perez, D. (2013). Mining large-scale smartphone data for personality studies. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17, 433–450.Google Scholar
  40. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 137–146.Google Scholar
  41. Connelly, B.S. & Ones, D.S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Costa, P.T.,Jr. & McCrae, R.R. (1989). The NEO PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  43. Costa, P.T.,Jr. & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five Factor Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  44. Costa, P.T.,Jr. & Widiger, T.A. (Eds.) (2002). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  45. de Montjoye, Y.A., Quoidbach, J., Robic, F. & Pentland, A.S. (2013). Predicting personality using novel mobile phone-based metrics. In A.M. Greenberg, W.G. Kennedy & N.D. Bos (Eds.), Social computing, behavioral-cultural modeling and prediction (pp. 48–55). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. De Raad, B., Barelds, D.P.H., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F., Mlačić, B., Blas, L.D., … Katigbak, M.S. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 160–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., Neumann, M. & Lüdtke, O. (2010). Aspekte von Wissenschaftspropädeutik. In U. Trautwein, M. Neumann, G. Nagy, O. Lüdtke & K. Maaz (Hrsg.), Schulleistungen von Abiturienten (S. 243–265). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  48. DeYoung, C.G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multiinformant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Digman, J.M. (1989). Five robust trait dimensions: Development, stability and utility. Journal of Personality, 57, 195–214.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Digman, J.M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Dilling, H., Mombour, W., Schmidt, M.H. & Schulte-Markwort, E. (2004). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10, Kapitel V (F): Diagnostische Kriterien für Forschung und Praxis (3. Aufl.). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  52. Dilling, H., Mombour, W. & Schmidt, M.H. (2015). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10, Kapitel V (F): Klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien (10. Aufl.) Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  53. Dörner, D., Kreuzig, H.W., Reither, F. & Stäudel, T. (Hrsg.) (1983). Lohhausen. Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  54. Dudek, F.J. (1979). The continuing misinterpretation of the standard error of measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 335–337.Google Scholar
  55. Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M. & Schmitt, M. (2015). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden (4. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.Google Scholar
  56. Eid, M., Lischetzke, T. & Nussbeck, F.W. (2006). Structural equation models for multitrait-multimethod data. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 283–299). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  57. Epstein, S. (1983). A research paradigm for the study of personality and emotions. In M.M. Page (Ed.), Personality: Current theory and research: 1982 Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 91–154). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  58. Eysenck, H.J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  59. Eysenck, H.J. & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1969). Personality structure and measurement. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  60. Falkai, P. & Wittchen, H.-U. (Hrsg.). (2014). Diagnostisches und Statistisches Manual Psychischer Störungen DSM-5®. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  61. Feingold, A. (1992a). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304–341.Google Scholar
  62. Fiedler, P. & Herpertz, S. (2016). Persönlichkeitsstörungen (7. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  63. Fleeson, W. & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Fraley, C. & Raftery, A. (2011). MCLUST Version 3.4.10 for R. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  65. Funder, D.C. (2012). Accurate personality judgment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 177–182.Google Scholar
  66. Funder, D.C. & Dobroth, K.M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409–418.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Galton, F. (1884). Measurement of character. Fortnightly Review, 42.Google Scholar
  68. Geiser, C. & Eid. M. (2006). Profilanalyse. In F. Petermann & M. Eid (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologischen Diagnostik (S. 318–331). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  69. Gerlitz, J.-Y. & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP (Research Notes No. 4/2005). Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  70. Gill, A.J. Oberlander, J. & Austin, E. (2006). Rating e-mail personality at zero acquaintance. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 497–507.Google Scholar
  71. Goldberg, L.R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexikons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative "Description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Göttert, R. & Asendorpf, J. (1989). Eine deutsche Version des California- Child-Q-Sort, Kurzform. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 70–82.Google Scholar
  74. Guilford, J.P. (1964). Persönlichkeit. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  75. Hampson, S.E., Goldberg, L.R. & John, O.P. (1987). Category-breadth and social-desirability values for 573 personality terms. European Journal of Personality, 1, 241–258.Google Scholar
  76. Hartshorne, H. & May, M.A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character. Vol. 1: Studies in deceit. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  77. Haselton, M.G. & Funder, D.C. (2006). The evolution of accuracy and bias in social judgment. In M. Schaller, J.A. Simpson & D.T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 15–38). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  78. Hathaway, S.R. & McKinley, J.C. (1972). MMPI Saarbrücken (5. Aufl.). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  79. Herzberg, P.Y. & Roth, M. (2006). Beyond resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers? An extension of personality prototype research. European Journal of Personality, 20, 5–28.Google Scholar
  80. Hofstee, W.K.B., Brokken, F.B. & Land, H. (1981). Constructie van een Standaard-Persoonlijkheids-Eigenschappenlijst (S.P.E.L.). Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 36, 443–452.Google Scholar
  81. Hossiep, R. & Paschen, M. (2003). Bochumer Inventar zur berufsbezogenen Persönlichkeitsbeschreibung – BIP (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  82. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Human, L.J. & Biesanz, J.C. (2013). Targeting the good target: An integrative review of the characteristics and consequences of being accurately perceived. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 248–272.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Jacobs, I. & Scholl, W. (2005). Interpersonale Adjektivliste (IAL). Diagnostica, 51, 145–155.Google Scholar
  85. John, O.P., Angleitner, A. & Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171–203.Google Scholar
  86. John, O.P., Caspi, A., Robins, R.W., Moffitt, T.E. & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1994). The “Little Five”: Exploring the nomological network of the Five-Factor Model of personality in adolescent boys. Child Development, 65, 160–178.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Klauer, K.J. (1984). Kontentvalidität. Diagnostica, 30, 1–23.Google Scholar
  88. Kohnstamm, G.A., Mervielde, I., Besevegis, E. & Halverson, C.F.,Jr. (1995). Tracing the Big Five in parents' free descriptions of their children. European Journal of Personality, 9, 283–304.Google Scholar
  89. Lasky, J.J., Hover, G.L., Smith, P.A., Duffendack, S.C. & Nord, C.L. (1959). Post-hospital adjustment as predicted by psychiatric patients and their staff. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 213–218.Google Scholar
  90. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
  91. Letzring, T.D. (2008). The good judge of personality: Characteristics, behaviors, and observer accuracy. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 914–932.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Livesley, W.J. & Jang, K.L. (2005). Differentiating normal, abnormal, and disordered personality. European Journal of Personality, 19, 257–268.Google Scholar
  93. Loranger, A.W., Sartorius, N., Andreoli, A., Berger, P., Buchheim, P., Channabasavanna, S.M., … & Regier, D.A. (1994). The International Personality Disorder Examination. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 215–224.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Lück, H.E. & Timaeus, E. (1969). Skalen zur Messung Manifester Angst (MAS) und Sozialer Wünschbarkeit (SDS-E und SDS-CM). Diagnostica, 15, 134–141.Google Scholar
  95. Martin, W. & Rovira, M. (1982). Response bias in eye-gaze perception. Journal of Psychology, 110, 203–209.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T.,Jr. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586–595.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr., de Lima, M.P., Simões, A., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., … & Piedmont, R.L. (1999). Age differences in personality across the adult life span: Parallels in five cultures. Developmental Psychology, 35, 466–477.Google Scholar
  98. Mehl, M.R., Gosling, S.D. & Pennebaker, J.W. (2006). Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 862–877.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 221–237.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  101. Molenaar, P.C.M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 201–218.Google Scholar
  102. Mombour, W., Zaudig, M., Berger, P., Gutierrez, K., Berner, W., Berger, K., … & von Bose, M. (1996). International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE). Göttingen: Hogrefe Testzentrale.Google Scholar
  103. Moran, P., Jenkins, R., Tylee, A., Blizard, R. & Mann, A. (2000). The prevalence of personality disorder among UK primary care attenders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 102, 52–57.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. Morey, L.C., Waugh, M.H. & Blashfield, R.K. (1985). MMPI scales for DSM- III personality disorders. Their derivation and correlates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 245–251.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  105. Moskowitz, D.S. & Schwarz, J.C. (1982). Validity comparison of behavior counts and ratings by knowledgeable informants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 518–528.Google Scholar
  106. Musch, J., Brockhaus, R. & Bröder, A. (2002). Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit. Diagnostica, 48, 121–129.Google Scholar
  107. Nestler, S. & Back, M.D. (2013). Applications and extensions of the lens model to understand interpersonal judgments at zero acquaintance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 374–379.Google Scholar
  108. Netzlek, J.B. (2012). Diary methods for social and personality psychology. London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  109. Norman, T. (1967). 2,800 personality trait descriptors: Normative operating characteristics for a university population (Tech. Rep.). Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  110. Ostendorf, F. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur: Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit. Regensburg: Roderer.Google Scholar
  111. Ostendorf, F. & Angleitner, A. (2003). NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar (revidierte Form, NEO-PI-R) nach Costa und McCrae. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  112. Patrick, C.J., Curtin, J.J. & Tellegen, A. (2002). Development and validation of a brief form of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 14, 150–163.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  113. Paulhus, D.L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.Google Scholar
  114. Pettit, F. (2002). A comparison of world-wide web and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34, 50–54.Google Scholar
  115. Robins, R.W., John, O.P., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T.E. & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: Three replicable personality types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 157–171.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. Robinson, W.S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rogosa, D. (1980). A critique of cross-lagged correlation. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 245–258.Google Scholar
  118. Sackeim, H.A. & Gur, R. (1978). Self-deception, self-confrontation, and consciousness. In G.E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. 2, pp.pp. 139–197). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  119. Sameroff, A.J., Seifer, R., Baldwin, A. & Baldwin, C. (1993). Stability of intelligence from preschool to adolescence: The influence of social and family risk factors. Child Development, 64, 80–97.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  120. Saucier, G. & Goldberg, L.R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69, 847–879.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. Saulsman, L.M. & Page, A.C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055–1085.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. Scherer, K.R. (1978). Personality inference from voice quality: The loud voice of extroversion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 467–487.Google Scholar
  123. Schönbrodt, F.D. & Asendorpf, J.B. (2011). Virtual social environments as a tool for psychological assessment: Dynamics of interaction with a virtual spouse. Psychological Assessment, 23, 7–17.Google Scholar
  124. Schyns, P. (2002). Wealth of nations, individual income and life satisfaction in 42 countries: A multilevel approach. Social Indicators Research, 60, 5–40.Google Scholar
  125. Simms, L.J., Zelazny, K., Yam, W.H. & Gros, D.F. (2010). Self-informant agreement for personality and evaluative person descriptors: Comparing methods for creating informant measures. European Journal of Personality, 24, 207–221.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. Skodol, A.E., Oldham, J.M., Bender, D.S., Dyck, I.R., Stout, R.L., Morey, L.C., … & Gunderson, J.G. (2005). Dimensional representations of DSM-IV personality disorders: Relationships to functional impairment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1919–1925.Google Scholar
  127. Soto, C.J., John, O.P., Gosling, S.D. & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of Big Five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 718–737.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. Specht, J., Egloff, B. & Schmukle, S.C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 862–882.Google Scholar
  129. Stemmler, G. (1992). Differential psychophysiology: Persons in situations. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  130. Stemmler, G. (2005). Biologische Ansätze. In H. Weber & T. Rammsayer (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Differentiellen Psychologie (S. 181–192). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  131. Stern, W. (1911). Die differentielle Psychologie in ihren methodischen Grundlagen. Leipzig: Barth (Reprint 1994, Bern: Huber).Google Scholar
  132. Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität. Diagnostica, 45, 173–177.Google Scholar
  133. Sullivan, H.S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  134. Szirmak, Z. & De Raad, B. (1994). Taxonomy and structure of Hungarian personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 8, 95–117.Google Scholar
  135. Van Yperen, N.W. & Snijders, T.A.B. (2000). A multilevel analysis of the demands-control model: Is stress at work determined by factors at the group level or the individual level? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 182–190.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  136. Vazire, S. & Mehl, M.R. (2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1202–1216.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  137. Vernon, P.E. (1933). Some characteristics of the good judge of personality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 42–57.Google Scholar
  138. Weinberger, D.A., Schwartz, G.E. & Davidson, R.J. (1979). Low-anxious, high-anxious, and repressive coping styles: Psychometric patterns and behavioral and physiological responses to stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 369–380.Google Scholar
  139. Widiger, T.A., Costa, P.T.,Jr. & McCrae, R.R. (2002). A proposal for Axis II: Diagnosing personality disorders using the five-factor model. In P.T. CostaJr,. & T.A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed., pp.431–456). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  140. Widiger, T.A., Frances, A.J., Pincus, H.A., Davis, W.W. & First, M.B. (1991). Toward an empirical classification for the DSM-IV. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 280–288.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  141. Wiggins, J.S. & Pincus, A.L. (2002). Personality structure and the structure of personality disorders. In P.T. CostaJr,. & T.H. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor-model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 103–124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  142. Wiggins, J.S., Trapnell, P. & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517–530.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  143. Wilhelm, O. (2002). Ability and achievement testing on the world wide web. In B. Batinic, U.D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Online social sciences. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  144. Wittmann, W.W. (1987). Grundlagen erfolgreicher Forschung in der Psychologie: Multimodale Diagnostik, Multiplismus, multivariate Reliabilitäts- und Validitätstheorie. Diagnostica, 33, 209–227.Google Scholar
  145. Wrzus, C. & Meehl, M.R. (2015). Lab and/or field? Measuring personality processes and their social consequences. European Journal of Personality, 29, 250–271.Google Scholar
  146. Wundt, W. (1903). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie (5. Aufl.; Bd. 3). Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  147. Yarkoni, T. (2010). Personality in 100,000 words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 363–373.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  148. Youyou, W., Kosinski, M. & Stillwell, D. (2015). Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 1036–1040.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franz J. Neyer
    • 1
  • Jens B. Asendorpf
    • 2
  • Jens B. Asendorpf
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für PsychologieFriedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaJenaDeutschland
  2. 2.Institut für PsychologieHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations