Advertisement

Application to prototypical metal-oxide clean surfaces: the complex TiO2 (110) surface reconstruction

  • A. ShkrebtiiEmail author
  • M. Rohlfing
Part of the Condensed Matter book series (volume 45B)

Abstract

This chapter provides information about the surface structure simulation of TiO2 (110) metal oxide.

Metal-oxide surfaces are structurally complex systems due to a variety of stoichiometries. Furthermore, different structures can exist for one particular chemical composition and presence of defects. Also, oxide surface depends sensitively on preparation conditions with limited possibility of annealing and purification afterward, making it difficult to arrive at the thermodynamical optimum. Therefore, compared to metals or semiconductors, where high structural quality of the surfaces can be achieved, oxide surfaces are not that well defined in terms of stoichiometry and imperfections. This suggests that the standard surface structure simulation approaches, based on periodically repeated supercell, might not provide the correct total energy minimum. As a consequence, simulated surface atomic geometry might not accurately describe the experimental surface structure of the oxides. Therefore, we will only briefly refer to a few theoretical or review papers on the oxide surfaces without presenting atomic structure model and structural tables.

Titanium dioxide TiO2 is a very important oxide material with its surfaces being intensively investigated. However, the theoretical and experimental results for a variety of structures do not generally agree well. The reason is that often, the surface contains a mixture of different structures and stoichiometries, and they always have a lot of defects (see, e.g., [94Hen, 96Fre, 03Die, 10Die]). For the relaxed geometries, we can refer to TiO2(110) surface [03Die] (Table 3 on p. 72) or detailed comparison of STM and ab initio simulation [07Par] (Tables 1 and 2). Other examples can be technologically important ZnO surfaces, which have been also studied recently [08Du, 13Pal]. Both TiO2 and ZnO surfaces contain a lot of defects, such as islands and pits of various sizes that can be understood from the formation energies’ point of view. In view of the above complexity when interpreting experimental results on surfaces of oxides, we do not go in further details of the simulated surface atomic structures.

Symbols and abbreviations

Short form

Full form

STM

scanning tunneling microscopy

References

  1. [94Hen]
    Henrich, V.E., Cox, P.A.: The Surface Science of Metal Oxides. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  2. [96Fre]
    Freund, H., Kuhlenbeck, H., Staemmler, V.: Rep. Prog. Phys. 59, 283 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [03Die]
    Diebold, U.: Surf. Sci. Rep. 48, 53 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [07Par]
    Park, K., Pan, M., Meunier, V., Plummer, E.: Phys. Rev. B. 75, 245415 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [08Du]
    Du, M., Zhang, S., Northrup, J., Erwin, S.: Phys. Rev. B. 78, 155424 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [10Die]
    Diebold, U., Li, S., Schmid, M.: Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61, 129 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [13Pal]
    Pal, S., Jasper-Tonnies, T., Hack, M., Pehlke, E.: Phys. Rev. B. 87, 085445 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT)OshawaCanada
  2. 2.Institut für FestkörpertheorieUniversität MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations