Advertisement

Policy, Process, People and Public Data

  • Ann-Sofie Hellberg
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8653)

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to analyze an implementation of the public data agenda to address the lack of empirical research on the subject. The focus of the paper is on the interplay between policy, process and people. The approach was qualitative, interpretive research and data was gathered through interaction, interviews and observations over a period of 20 months. Findings showed that the policies are a bit opportunistic and that it is not clear what data that should be made available to attract citizens to take part in the agenda, raw data or processed data? Furthermore, the incentives for citizens to engage in the public data agenda were not obvious. I therefore wonder, do we believe too much in information? Are we being information determinists?

Keywords

Public Data Open Government Data (OGD) Public Sector Information (PSI) E-government T-government Public Sector Reform 

References

  1. 1.
    European Commission, A Digital Agenda for Europe (2010), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=com:2010:0245:fin:en:pdf
  2. 2.
    European Commission, Open data An engine for innovation, growth and transparent governance (2011), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0882:FIN:EN:PDF
  3. 3.
    Bannister, F., Connolly, R.: Forward to the past: Lessons for the future of e-government from the story so far. Information Polity 17(3), 211–226 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leavitt, H., Whisler, T.L.: Management in the 1980s. Harvard Business Review 36, 41–48 (1958)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Veenstra, A.F.E.: IT-induced Public sector Transformation. Boxpress (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Irani, Z., Elliman, T., Jackson, P.: Electronic transformation of government in the UK: a research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems 16, 327–335 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lips, M.: E-Government is dead: Long live Public Administration 2.0. Information Polity 17(3), 239–250 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heeks, R., Bailur, S.: Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly 24(2), 243–265 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andersen, K.V., Henriksen, H.Z.: The first leg of e-government research: domains and application areas 1998-2003. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR) 1(4), 26–44 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grönlund, Å.: State of the art in e-Gov research: surveying conference publications. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 1(4), 1–25 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heidelberger, C.A.: Citizens, Not Consumers. In: Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., Dwivedi, Y. (eds.) Handbook of Research on ICT-Enabled Transformational Government: A Global Perspective (51-71). Information Science Reference, Hershey (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alanazi, J.M., Chatfield, A.T.: Sharing government-owned data with the public: A cross-country analysis of open data practice in the middle east. Paper presented at the 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2012, pp. 335–344 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Open Government Partnership, What is the Open Government Partnership (2014), http://www.opengovpartnership.org/
  14. 14.
    Mintrom, M., Norman, P.: Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change. Policy Studies Journal 37(4), 649–667 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olsson, J.: The Power of the Inside Activist: Understanding Policy Change by Empowering the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). Planning Theory and Practice 10(2), 167–187 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sabatier, P.: Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press, Boulder (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hajer, M.: Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences 36, 175–195 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ojo, A., Janssen, M.: Aligning core stakeholders’ perspectives and issues in the open government data community. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 293–294 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Artigas, F., Chun, S.: Visual analytics for open government data. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 298–299 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Graves, A., Hendler, J.: Visualization tools for open government data. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 136–145 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wenzel, F., Köppl, D., Kießling, W.: Interactive toolbox for spatial-textual preference queries. In: Nascimento, M.A., Sellis, T., Cheng, R., Sander, J., Zheng, Y., Kriegel, H.-P., Renz, M., Sengstock, C. (eds.) SSTD 2013. LNCS, vol. 8098, pp. 462–466. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    de Cesare, S., Foy, G., Partridge, C.: Re-engineering Data with 4D Ontologies and Graph Databases. In: Franch, X., Soffer, P. (eds.) CAiSE Workshops 2013. LNBIP, vol. 148, pp. 304–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Albano, C.S.: Open government data: a value chain model proposal. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 285–286 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shadbolt, N., O’Hara, K.: Linked Data in Government. IEEE Internet Computing 17(4) (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lofi, C., Krestel, R.: iParticipate: Automatic tweet generation from local government data. In: Lee, S.-g., Peng, Z., Zhou, X., Moon, Y.-S., Unland, R., Yoo, J. (eds.) DASFAA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7239, pp. 295–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cornford, J., Wilson, R., Baines, S., Richardson, R.: Local governance in the new information ecology: the challenge of building interpretative communities. Public Money & Management 33(3), 201–208 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chan, C.M.: From Open Data to Open Innovation Strategies: Creating E-Services Using Open Government Data. In: 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1890–1899 (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jorge, S., Sá, P.M., Lourenço, R.P.: Financial transparency in local administration’s entities in portugal: Analysis of the information disclosed online. Revista Portuguesa De Estudos Regionais 31(1), 39–54 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ding, L., Lebo, T., Erickson, J.S., DiFranzo, D., Williams, G.T., Li, X., Hendler, J.A.: TWC LOGD: A portal for linked open government data ecosystems. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 9(3), 325–333 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hoxha, J., Brahaj, A.: Open Government Data on the Web: A Semantic Approach. In: 2011 International Conference on Emerging Intelligent Data and Web Technologies (EIDWT), pp. 107–113 (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Heise, A., Naumann, F.: Integrating open government data with Stratosphere for more transparency. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 14, 45–56 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kaschesky, M., Selmi, L.: Fusepool R5 linked data framework: concepts, methodologies, and tools for linked data. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 156–165 (2013)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Böhm, C., Freitag, M., Heise, A., Lehmann, C., Mascher, A., Naumann, F., Schmidt, M.: GovWILD: Integrating open government data for transparency. Paper presented at the WWW 2012 - Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on World Wide Web Companion, pp. 321–324 (2012)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Davies, T., Frank, M.: ‘There’s no such thing as raw data’: exploring the socio-technical life of a government dataset. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, pp. 75–78 (2013)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cyganiak, R., Maali, F., Peristeras, V.: Self-service linked government data with dcat and gridworks. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems, vol. (37) (2010)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Myers, M.D., Avison, D.: An introduction to qualitative research in information systems. Qualitative Research in Information Systems 4 (2002)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kendall, J.E., Kendall, K.E.: Storytelling as a Qualitative Method for IS Research: Heralding the Heroic and Echoing the Mythic. Australasian Journal of Information Systems 17(2) (2012)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moen, T.: Reflections on the narrative research approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(4) (2006)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lindseth, A., Norberg, A.: A Phenomenological Hermeneutical Method for Researching Lived Experience. Scandinavic Journal of Caring Sciences 18, 145–153 (2004)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Creswell, J.W.: Qualitative inquiry & Research Design. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks (2007)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Government Offices of Sweden. Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act (2009), http://www.government.se/content/1/c6/13/13/97/aa5c1d4c.pdf
  42. 42.

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann-Sofie Hellberg
    • 1
  1. 1.InformaticsÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden

Personalised recommendations