Advertisement

The Development in Leading e-Government Articles 2001-2010: Definitions, Perspectives, Scope, Research Philosophies, Methods and Recommendations: An Update of Heeks and Bailur

  • Christian Ø. Madsen
  • Jesper Bull Berger
  • Mick Phythian
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8653)

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the development in leading e-government papers from 2001-2010. Inspired by a study by Heeks and Bailur, the analysis uses a different sampling method, adds new themes, and focuses on changes over time. Through an iterative process known as template analysis the five most cited papers from each year are analyzed according to themes such as perspectives on the impact and impact causes of e-government, methods used, underlying research philosophies and recommendations. Findings indicate that the papers are still somewhat optimistic regarding the impact of e-government, but no longer as technologically deterministic. Discussions of research philosophies start to appear, as do social constructionist studies, although most papers are still positivistic. There is an increase in the use of primary data, and some movement in focus from infrastructure and services towards citizens. There is little development in the discussions of generalization of results and recommendations offered.

Keywords

E-government literature review template analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    AlAwadhi, S., Morris, A.: The Use of the UTAUT Model in the Adoption of E-government Services in Kuwait. In: 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-41), Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii, p. 219 (1-11) (2008) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Almarabeh, T., AbuAli, A.: A general framework for e-government: definition maturity challenges, opportunities, and success. European Journal of Scientific Research 39(1), 29–42 (2010) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andersen, K.V., Henriksen, H.Z.: E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly 23(2), 236–248 (2006) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basu, S.: E-Government and Developing Countries: An Overview. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 18(1), 109–132 (2004) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bélanger, F., Carter, L.: Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17(2), 165–176 (2008) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bélanger, F., Carter, L.: The impact of the digital divide on e-government use. Communications of the ACM 52(4), 132–135 (2009) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T., Grimes, J.M.: Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly 27(3), 264–271 (2010) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carter, L., Bélanger, F.: The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors *. Information Systems Journal 15(1), 5–25 (2005) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carter, L., Weerakkody, V.: E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers 10(4), 473–482 (2008) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chadwick, A., May, C.: Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet: “e-government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance-an International Journal of Policy and Administration 16(2), 271–300 (2003) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cordella, A., Iannacci, F.: Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 19(1), 52–66 (2010) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coursey, D., Norris, F.: Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment. Public Administration Review 68(3), 523–536 (2008) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dada, D.: The failure of e-government in developing countries: A literature review. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 26 (2006) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ebrahim, Z., Irani, Z.: E-government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal 11(5), 589–611 (2005) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Evans, D., Yen, D.C.: E-Government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information Quarterly 23(2), 207–235 (2006) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fang, Z.: E-government in digital era: concept, practice, and development. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management 10(2), 1–22 (2002) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gauld, R., Goldfinch, S., Horsburgh, S.: Do they want it? Do they use it? The ‘Demand-Side’ of e-Government in Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly 27(2), 177–186 (2010) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A.: E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly 22(2), 187–216 (2005) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., Littleboy, D.: Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management 17(4/5), 286–301 (2004) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guijarro, L.: Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States. Government Information Quarterly 24(1), 89–101 (2007) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gupta, M.P., Jana, D.: E-government evaluation: a framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly 20(4), 365–387 (2003) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heeks, R., Bailur, S.: Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly 24(2), 243–265 (2007) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ho, A.T.K.: Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review 62(4), 434–444 (2002) Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., Gutteling, J.M.: Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior 23(4), 1838–1852 (2007) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Howard, M.: E-government across the globe: how will’e’change government. e-Government 90, 80 (2001) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hung, S.-Y., Chang, C.-M., Yu, T.-J.: Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: the case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly 23(1), 97–122 (2006) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jaeger, P.T.: The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly 20(4), 323–331 (2003) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jaeger, P.T., Thompson, K.M.: E-government around the world: lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly 20(4), 389–394 (2003) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kaylor, C., Deshazo, R., Van Eck, D.: Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities. Government Information Quarterly 18(4), 293–307 (2001) Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim, S., Kim, H.J., Lee, H.: An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly 26(1), 42–50 (2009) Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kumar, V., et al.: Factors for successful e-government adoption: a conceptual framework. Electronic Journal of e-Government 5(1), 63–76 (2007) Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Layne, K., Lee, J.W.: Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly 18(2), 122–136 (2001) Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lean, O.K., et al.: Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia. International Journal of Information Management 29(6), 458–475 (2009) Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee, J.: 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly 27(3), 220–230 (2010) Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mecella, M., Batini, C.: Enabling Italian e-government through a cooperative architecture. Computer 34(2), 40-+ (2001) Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moon, M.J.: The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review 62(4), 424–433 (2002) Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ndou, V.: E-government for developing countries: opportunities and chal-lenges. In: The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, p. 18 (2004) Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Norris, D.F., Moon, M.J.: Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? Public Administration Review 65(1), 64–75 (2005) Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reddick, C.G.: A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly 21(1), 51–64 (2004) Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schuppan, T.: E-Government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa. Government Information Quarterly 26(1), 118–127 (2009) Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Silcock, R.: What is e-Government? Parliamentary Affairs 54(1), 88–101 (2001) Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thomas, J.C., Streib, G.: The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of E-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(1), 83–102 (2003) Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tolbert, C.J., Mossberger, K.: The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government. Public Administration Review 66(3), 354–369 (2006) Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tolbert, C.J., Mossberger, K., McNeal, R.: Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States. Public Administration Review 68(3), 549–563 (2008) Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Verdegem, P., Verleye, G.: User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly 26(3), 487–497 (2009) Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Warkentin, M., et al.: Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets 12(3), 157–162 (2002) Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Welch, E.W.: Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3), 371–391 (2005) Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wescott, C.G.: E‐Government in the Asia‐pacific region. Asian Journal of Political Science 9(2), 1–24 (2001) Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    West, D.M.: E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review 64(1), 15–27 (2004) Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yildiz, M.: E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly 24(3), 646–665 (2007) Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Akkaya, C., Wolf, D., Krcmar, H.: The role of trust in e-government adoption: A literature review (2010) Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Astrup, T.P., Flensburg, T., Olsen, M.: Heavy workload and slow IT frustrate civil servants. Politiken (2013) (in Danish) Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Blaikie, N.W.H.: Designing social research: the logic of anticipation (2010) Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bolívar, M.P.R., Muñoz, L.A., Hernández, A.M.L.: Trends of e-Government Research. Contextualization and Research Opportunities. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research 10(1) (2010) Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Braun, J., Ahlemann, F., Mohan, K.: Understanding Benefits Management Success: Results of a Field Study (2010) Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Carbo, T., Williams, J.G.: Models and Metrics for Evaluating Local Electronic Government Systems and Services. Electronic Journal of e-Government 2(2), 95–104 (2004) Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989) Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fountain, J.E.: Building the virtual state: information technology and institutional change, vol. xii, 251 p. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. (2001) Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gallivan, M.J.: Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework. ACM Sigmis Database 32(3), 51–85 (2001) Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Heeks, R.: Reinventing Government in the Information Age. International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform, p. 362. Routledge, New York (1999) Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hofmann, S., Räckers, M., Becker, J.: Identifying Factors of E-Government Acceptance – A Literature Review. In: 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2012), Orlando, Florida, USA (2012) Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Joseph, R.C.: A structured analysis of e-government studies: Trends and opportunities. Government Information Quarterly 30(4), 435–440 (2013) Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    King, N.: Template analysis (1998) Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    King, N.: Doing template analysis. Qualitatve Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges, pp. 426–450 (2012) Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kræmmergaard, P., Schlitcher, B.R.: A Comprehensive Literature Review of the E-Government: Research Field over a Decade. In: tGov Workshop 2011 (tGOV 2011) (2011) Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Larivière, V., Gingras, Y.: The impact factor’s Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(2), 424–427 (2010) Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    MacRoberts, M.H., MacRoberts, B.R.: Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom‐cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(1), 1–12 (2010) Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Markus, M.L., et al.: Organizational and Institutional Arrangements for E-Government: A Preliminary Report on Contemporary IT Management Approaches in US State Governments. In: 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-46). IEEE Computer Society, Wailea (2013) Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Merton, R.K.: The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810), 56–63 (1968) Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Williams, M.D.: A meta-analysis of existing research on citizen adoption of e-government. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–17 (2013) Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Rowe, C., Thomson, J.: People and chips: the human implications of information technology (1996) Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E., Morley, D.: Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces, 22 (1992) Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Snead, J.T., Wright, E.: E-government research in the United States. Government Information Quarterly (2014) Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    The Council of Appeal on Health and Safety at Work. It was wrong to cancel child payment. Principle Decisions 2014 (Feburary 17, 2014) (cited March 29, 2014) Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Titah, R., Barki, H.: E-government adoption and acceptance: a literature review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 2(3), 23–57 (2006) Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Tyre, M.J., Orlikowski, W.J.: Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science 5(1), 98–118 (1994) Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    van de Wijngaert, L., Bouwman, H., Contractor, N.: A network approach toward literature review. Quality & Quantity, 1–21 (2012) Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Wahid, F.: The current state of research on eGovernment in developing countries: A literature review. In: Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Wimmer, M.A., Moe, C.E., Flak, L.S. (eds.) EGOV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7443, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Ø. Madsen
    • 1
  • Jesper Bull Berger
    • 2
  • Mick Phythian
    • 3
  1. 1.The IT University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Roskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark
  3. 3.Centre for Computing & Social ResponsibilityDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations