Bridging the Digital Divide at the Regional Level? The Effect of Regional and National Policies on Broadband Access in Europe’s Regions

  • Pau Palop García
  • Basanta Thapa
  • Björn Niehaves
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8653)


Reducing the digital divide is one of the main policy objectives of the “Europe 2020 Strategy” (2010) and the “Riga Declaration” (2006). To this end, the EU transfers structural funds for broadband expansion to regional governments rather than to the national level which is typically seen as the decisive actor in broadband expansion. To explore the relevance of the regions in widening broadband access, we analyze the influence of economic, demographic and institutional factors on broadband expansion at the regional and national level. In order to account for the interplay between both levels of government, we employ a multi-level regression model. We find that regional level variables are able to explain part of broadband access improvement. Significant variables are ERDF expenditure dedicated to broadband expansion, the status of regional broadband diffusion in 2008 and the national degree of inter-platform competition. The paper concludes that, although there is evidence of the role of the regions in the European policy process, the national level still performs an important gatekeeper function and that national ICT strategies are needed to successfully close the geographical digital divide in the EU.


Broadband Digital Divide e-exclusion regions ERDF 


  1. 1.
    Dabinett, G.: EU mainstreaming of the information society in regional development policy. Reg. Stud. 35, 168–173 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    European-Commission, Digital Agenda for Europe 2010-2020. URL Httpec Eur. Euinformationsocietyindexen Htm Httpec Eur. Euinformationsocietydigital-Agendaindexen Htm (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Euroactiv: Commission claws back up to €200 million broadband funding in budget breakthrough. Euroactiv. (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Distaso, W., Lupi, P., Manenti, F.M.: Platform competition and broadband uptake: Theory and empirical evidence from the European Union. Inf. Econ. Policy 18, 87–106 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauer, M., Börzel, T.: Regions and the European Union. Handb. Multi-Level Gov. (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Le Galès, P., Lequesne, C.: Regions in Europe: The Paradox of Power. Routledge (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bouckaert, J., Van Dijk, T., Verboven, F.: Access regulation, competition, and broadband penetration: An international study. Telecommun. Policy 34, 661–671 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, S., Marcu, M., Lee, S.: An empirical analysis of fixed and mobile broadband diffusion. Inf. Econ. Policy 23, 227–233 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yates, D.J., Gulati, G.J.J., Weiss, J.W.: Understanding the Impact of Policy, Regulation and Governance on Mobile Broadband Diffusion. In: 46th Hawaii Int. Conf. on. Syst. Sci. HICSS 2013, pp. 2852–2861. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aron, D., Burnstein, D.: Broadband adoption in the United States: An empirical analysis. SSRN Work. Pap. (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grosso, M.: Determinants of broadband penetration in OECD nations. Aust. Commun. Policy Res. Forum (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garcia-Murillo, M.: International broadband deployment: The impact of unbundling. Commun. Strateg (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, S., Brown, J.S.: Examining broadband adoption factors: an empirical analysis between countries. Info 10, 25–39 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ngwenyama, O., Morawczynski, O.: Factors affecting ICT expansion in emerging economies: An analysis of ICT infrastructure expansion in five Latin American countries. Inf. Technol. Dev. 15, 237–258 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cava-Ferreruela, I., Alabau-Munoz, A.: Broadband policy assessment: A cross-national empirical analysis. Telecommun. Policy 30, 445–463 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cadman, R., Dineen, C.: Broadband Markets in the EU: the importance of dynamic competition to market growth. Strategy Policy Consult Netw Ltd (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bauer, J.M., Kim, J.H., Wildman, S.S.: Effects of national policy on the diffusion of broadband in OECD countries. UFL-LBS Workshop Future Broadband Wired Wirel. Gainsville Fla. (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gulati, G., Yates, D.: The Impact of Governance Indicators and Policy Variables on Broadband Diffusion in the Developed and Developing Worlds. SSRN Work. Pap (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Turk, T., Jerman Blažič, B., Trkman, P.: Factors and sustainable strategies fostering the adoption of broadband communications in an enlarged European Union. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75, 933–951 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eurostat: Eurostat regional yearbook 2010. Publications Office of the European Union-Luxembourg (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hooghe, L., Marks, G.: Europe with the regions: channels of regional representation in the European Union. Publius J. Fed. 26, 73–92 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Flamm, K., Chaudhuri, A.: An analysis of the determinants of broadband access. Telecommun Policy 31, 312–326 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M.: Governance matters VIII: aggregate and individual governance indicators. World Bank Policy Res. Work. Pap, pp. 1996–2008 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bryk, A., Raudenbusch, S.: Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data management methods. Newbury Park Sage Publ Delgado Л Lopez-Fernandez Luna JD 1993 Influ Dr Gend Satisf Users Med Care 31, 795–800 (1992)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bosker, R., Snijders, T.: Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. SAGE Publications (1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brown, R.D., Hauenstein, N.M.: Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to the rwg indices. Organ Res Methods 8, 165–184 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hox: Applied Multilevel Analysis. TT-Publikaties (1994)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D.: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package Version 3, 57 (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Revelle, W.: Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. R Package Version 1019 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maj, A.: Lmmfit: Goodness-of-Fit-Measures for Linear Mixed Models with One-Level-Grouping. R Package Version 1 (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bliese, P.: Multilevel Modeling in R (2.2)-A Brief Introduction to R, the multilevel package and the nlme package (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pau Palop García
    • 1
  • Basanta Thapa
    • 2
  • Björn Niehaves
    • 2
  1. 1.Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Hertie School of GovernanceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations