Open Government Data: Facilitating and Motivating Factors for Coping with Potential Barriers in the Brazilian Context

  • Claudio Sonaglio Albano
  • Nicolau Reinhard
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8653)


The use of Open Government Data (OGD) involves multiple activities developed by networks of users with different capacities and goals, along a value chain. These users, and also government agents supplying OGD recognize benefits, motivations, barriers, facilitating and inhibiting factors in the process. This paper surveyed the perceptions of Brazilian OGD users and government agents, in order to provide information for the improvement of OGD supply and use.


open government data benefits and barriers facilitating and motivating factors 


  1. 1.
    Benkler, Y.: The Wealth of Networks (2006),
  2. 2.
    CGI. Brazilian Internet Steering Committee, Survey on the use of Information and Communication Technologies in Brazil ICT Electronic Government 2010 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cox, A.: The art of the possible: relationship management in power regimes and supply chain. International Journal of Supply Chain Management 9(5), 346–356 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Craveiro, G., Santana, M., Albuquerque, J.P.: Assessing Open Government Budgetary Data in Brazil. In: ICDS 2013, The Seventh International Conference on Digital Society (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davies, T.G., Bawa, Z.A.: The Promises and Perils of Open Government Data (OGD). Special Issue: Community Informatics and Open Government Data 8(2) (2012), Disponível em: (access ins May 2012)
  6. 6.
    Dawes, S.S., Helbig, N.: Information strategies for open government: Challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency. In: Wimmer, M.A., Chappelet, J.-L., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) EGOV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6228, pp. 50–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Espinoza, J.F., Recinos, I.P., Morales, M.P.: Datos Abiertos: oportunidades y desafíos para Centroamérica con base en una cadena de valor. In: Conferencia Regional de Datos Abiertos para América Latina y el Caribe - 2013 – Montevideo, Uruguay (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grandori, A.: An organizational assessment of interfirm coordination modes. Organization Studies 18(6), 897–925 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Helbig, N., Cresswell, A.M., Burke, B.G., Pardo, T.A., Reyes-Luna, L.: Modeling the Informational Relationships between Government and Society. In: Open Government Consultative Workshop, June 26-27. CTG, Albany (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Helbig, N., Cresswell, A.M., Burke, B.G., Reyes-Luna, L.: The Dynamics of Opening Government Data (2013), (acessojaneiro 2013)
  11. 11.
    Hughes, J.: Why Open Data is necessary but not sufficient to make a difference (2011),
  12. 12.
    Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Dataand Open Government. Information Systems Management 29, 258–268 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralised data. 266 Int. J. Web Engineering and Technology 6(3) (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lathrop, D., Ruma, L.: Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice, 1st edn. O’Reilly Media (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McKinsey, Open data: Unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information (2013), (access in November 2013)
  16. 16.
    Oliver, C.: Determinants of interorganizational relationships: integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review 15, 241–265 (1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prince, A., Jolías, L., Brys, C.: Análisis de La cadena de valor del ecosistema de Datos Abiertos de La Ciudad de Buenos Aires. In: Conferencia Regional de Datos Abiertos para América Latina y el Caribe - junio de 2013 – Montevideo, Uruguay (2013), (accessed August 2013)
  18. 18.
    Robinson, D., Zeller, W., Yu, D.: Government data and the invisible hand. Yale Journal of Law and Technology 11, 160 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sayogo, D.G., Pardo, T.: Exploring the Motive for Data Publication in Open Data Initiative: Linking Intention to Action. In: 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2012), (acesso em dezembro 2012)
  20. 20.
    Solar, M., Concha, G., Meijueiro, L.: A Model to Assess Open Government Data in Public Agencies. In: Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Wimmer, M.A., Moe, C.E., Flak, L.S. (eds.) EGOV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7443, pp. 210–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    W3C. The Open data Handbook, (2009) (accessed September 2011)
  22. 22.
    Williamson, O.E.: The Economics of Governance. The American Economic Review 95(2), 1–18 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., Alibaks, R.S.: Socio-technical Impediments of Open Data. Journal of e-Government 10(2), 156–172 (2012),; ISSN 1479-439X 156 ©Academic Publishing International Ltd Zuiderwijk

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio Sonaglio Albano
    • 1
  • Nicolau Reinhard
    • 2
  1. 1.Unipampa, Federal University of PampaBagéBrazil
  2. 2.School of Economics, Business and Accounting, Business DepartmentUniversity of Sao PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations