International Conference on Theory and Application of Diagrams

Diagrams 2014: Diagrammatic Representation and Inference pp 108-122 | Cite as

Evaluating the Impact of Clutter in Euler Diagrams

  • Mohanad Alqadah
  • Gem Stapleton
  • John Howse
  • Peter Chapman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8578)


Euler diagrams, used to visualize data and as a basis for visual languages, are an effective representation of information, but they can become cluttered. Previous research established a measure of Euler diagram clutter, empirically shown to correspond with how people perceive clutter. However, the impact of clutter on user understanding is unknown. An empirical study was executed with three levels of diagram clutter. We found a significant effect: increased diagram clutter leads to significantly worse performance, measured by time and error rates. In addition, we found a significant effect of zone (a region in the diagram) clutter on time and error rates. Surprisingly, the zones with a middle level of clutter had the highest error rate compared to the zones with lowest and the highest clutter. Also, the questions whose answers were placed in zones with medium clutter had the highest mean time taken to answer questions. In conclusion, both diagram clutter and zone clutter impact the interpretation of Euler diagrams. Consequently, future work will establish whether a single, but cluttered, Euler diagram is a more effective representation of information than multiple, but less cluttered, Euler diagrams.


Euler diagrams clutter diagram comprehension 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ellis, G., Dix, A.: A taxonomy of clutter reduction for information visualisation. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics 13(6), 1216–1223 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertini, E., Dell’Aquila, L., Santucci, G.: Reducing infovis cluttering through non uniform sampling, displacement, and user perception. In: SPIE Proceedings. Visualization and Data Analysis, vol. 6060 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kestler, H., Muller, A., Gress, T., Buchholz, M.: Generalized Venn diagrams: A new method for visualizing complex genetic set relations. Bioinformatics 21(8), 1592–1595 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilkinson, L.: Exact and approximate area-proportional circular Venn and Euler diagrams. IEEE Trans Visualization and Computer Graphics 18(2), 321–331 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Howse, J., Stapleton, G., Taylor, J.: Spider diagrams. LMS Journal of Computation and Mathematics 8, 145–194 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mineshima, K., Okada, M., Takemura, R.: A diagrammatic inference system with Euler circles. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21(3), 365–391 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swoboda, N., Allwein, G.: Heterogeneous reasoning with Euler/Venn diagrams containing named constants and FOL. In: Proc. Euler Diagrams 2004. ENTCS, vol. 134 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benoy, F., Rodgers, P.: Evaluating the comprehension of Euler diagrams. In: IEEE Information Visualization, pp. 771–778 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blake, A., Stapleton, G., Rodgers, P., Cheek, L., Howse, J.: The Impact of Shape on the Perception of Euler Diagrams. In: Dwyer, T., Purchase, H.C., Delaney, A. (eds.) Diagrams 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8578, pp. 124–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blake, A., Stapleton, G., Rodgers, P., Cheek, L., Howse, J.: Does the orientation of an Euler diagram affect user comprehension? In: Proc. Visual Languages and Computing, DMS, pp. 185–190 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fish, A., Khazaei, B., Roast, C.: User-comprehension of Euler diagrams. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 22(5), 340–354 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodgers, P., Zhang, L., Purchase, H.: Wellformedness properties in Euler diagrams: Which should be used? IEEE Trans Visualization and Computer Graphics 18(7), 1089–1100 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    John, C., Fish, A., Howse, J., Taylor, J.: Exploring the notion of ‘Clutter’ in Euler diagrams. In: Barker-Plummer, D., Cox, R., Swoboda, N. (eds.) Diagrams 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4045, pp. 267–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Isenberg, P., Bezerianos, A., Dragicevic, P., Fekete, J.: A study on dual-scale data charts. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics 17(12), 2469–2478 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Puchase, H.: Which aesthetic has the greatest effect on human understanding? In: DiBattista, G. (ed.) GD 1997. LNCS, vol. 1353, pp. 248–261. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Riche, N., Dwyer, T.: Untangling Euler diagrams. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics 16(6), 1090–1099 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G.C.: Effective diagrammatic communication: Syntactic, semantic and pragmatic issues. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 10(4), 317–342 (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stapleton, G., Rodgers, P., Howse, J., Taylor, J.: Properties of Euler diagrams. In: Proc. Layout of Software Engineering Diagrams, pp. 2–16. EASST (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., Nakano, L.: Measuring Visual Clutter. J. Vision 7(2) (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohanad Alqadah
    • 1
  • Gem Stapleton
    • 1
  • John Howse
    • 1
  • Peter Chapman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BrightonUK

Personalised recommendations